Background The ODYSSEY COMBO I study ( http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01644175 ) evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab as add-on therapy to stable maximally tolerated daily statin with or ...without other lipid-lowering therapy in high cardiovascular risk patients with suboptimally controlled hypercholesterolemia. Methods This multicenter, phase 3, randomized (2:1 alirocumab vs placebo), double-blind, 52-week trial enrolled 316 patients with established coronary heart disease or coronary heart disease risk equivalents and hypercholesterolemia. Alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks Q2W) or placebo Q2W was self-administered subcutaneously via 1 mL prefilled pen. The alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W (also 1 mL) at week 12 if week 8 low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was ≥70 mg/dL. The primary efficacy end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (intention-to-treat analysis). Results At week 24, estimated mean (95% CI) changes in LDL-C from baseline were −48.2% (−52.0% to −44.4%) and −2.3% (−7.6% to 3.1%) for alirocumab and placebo, respectively, an estimated mean (95% CI) difference of −45.9% (−52.5% to −39.3%) ( P < .0001). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL was achieved by 75% alirocumab versus 9% placebo patients at week 24. At week 12, 83.2% of evaluable alirocumab-treated patients remained on 75-mg Q2W. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions Alirocumab treatment achieved a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C and allowed a greater proportion of patients to achieve LDL-C goals, versus placebo after 24 weeks in high cardiovascular risk patients with suboptimally controlled hypercholesterolemia at baseline despite receiving maximally tolerated statin with or without other lipid-lowering therapy. The frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events and study medication discontinuations were generally comparable between treatment groups.
Summary Background Inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 serine protease (PCSK9) resulted in large reductions of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in phase 1 trials. ...We assessed the efficacy and safety of various doses and dosing intervals of REGN727, a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, added to statins, to further lower LDL-C in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Methods This multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial was done at 16 lipid clinics in the USA and Canada. Between Jan 18, 2011, and Nov 7, 2011, we enrolled adults with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and LDL-C concentrations of 2·6 mmol/L or higher on stable diet and statin dose, with or without ezetimibe. Patients were randomly assigned to receive REGN727 150 mg, 200 mg, or 300 mg every 4 weeks, or 150 mg every 2 weeks, or placebo every 2 weeks (ratio 1:1:1:1:1). Randomisation was stratified by concomitant use of ezetimibe at baseline. Investigators, study staff, and patients were masked to treatment group. Blinding was maintained by administration of placebo alternating with REGN727 for the groups of 4 week dosing. The primary endpoint was mean percent reduction in LDL-C from baseline at week 12 and was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group. This trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT 01266876. Findings 77 patients were randomly assigned to study groups (15–16 patients per group) and all were analysed. Least-squares (LS) mean LDL-C reduction from baseline to week 12 was 28·9% (SE 5·08) for 150 mg every 4 weeks (p=0·0113), 31·54% (4·91) for 200 mg every 4 weeks (p=0·0035), 42·53% (5·09) for 300 mg every 4 weeks (p<0·0001), and 67·90% (4·85) for 150 mg every 2 weeks (p<0·0001), compared with 10·65% (5·04) with placebo. One serious adverse event was reported with placebo and none with REGN727. No increases of more than three times the upper limit of normal were reported for hepatic transaminases or creatinine kinase. The most common adverse event was injection-site reaction with one patient in the group of 300 mg REGN727 terminating treatment. Interpretation REGN727 was well tolerated and achieved substantial further LDL-C reduction in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia and elevated LDL-C treated with high-dose statins, with or without ezetimibe. REGN727 has the potential to provide optimum control of LDL-C in patients with this disorder. Funding Sanofi US and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Incorporated.
Alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), has been shown to reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels in patients who are ...receiving statin therapy. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to establish safety and efficacy.
We conducted a randomized trial involving 2341 patients at high risk for cardiovascular events who had LDL cholesterol levels of 70 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) or more and were receiving treatment with statins at the maximum tolerated dose (the highest dose associated with an acceptable side-effect profile), with or without other lipid-lowering therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive alirocumab (150 mg) or placebo as a 1-ml subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage change in calculated LDL cholesterol level from baseline to week 24.
At week 24, the difference between the alirocumab and placebo groups in the mean percentage change from baseline in calculated LDL cholesterol level was -62 percentage points (P<0.001); the treatment effect remained consistent over a period of 78 weeks. The alirocumab group, as compared with the placebo group, had higher rates of injection-site reactions (5.9% vs. 4.2%), myalgia (5.4% vs. 2.9%), neurocognitive events (1.2% vs. 0.5%), and ophthalmologic events (2.9% vs. 1.9%). In a post hoc analysis, the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (death from coronary heart disease, nonfatal myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization) was lower with alirocumab than with placebo (1.7% vs. 3.3%; hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.90; nominal P=0.02).
Over a period of 78 weeks, alirocumab, when added to statin therapy at the maximum tolerated dose, significantly reduced LDL cholesterol levels. In a post hoc analysis, there was evidence of a reduction in the rate of cardiovascular events with alirocumab. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ODYSSEY LONG TERM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01507831.).
Previous individual trials of alirocumab (a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody) showed significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reductions with overall treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates ...comparable with controls. This analysis evaluated safety data from 14 trials (4 phase 2 and 10 phase 3, 8 to 104 weeks; n = 5,234), in 2 pools according to control (placebo/ezetimibe). Overall, 3,340 patients received alirocumab (4,029 patient-years' exposure), 1,276 received placebo, and 618 received ezetimibe. Incidence of deaths, serious TEAEs, discontinuations because of TEAEs, and overall TEAEs were similar between alirocumab and control groups. Alirocumab was associated with a higher incidence of local injection site reactions (7.4% vs 5.3% with placebo; 3.1% vs 2.3% with ezetimibe), pruritus (1.3% vs 0.4% placebo; 0.9% vs 0.5% ezetimibe), and upper respiratory tract infection signs and symptoms (2.1% vs 1.1% placebo; 1.3% vs 0.8% ezetimibe). Incidence of musculoskeletal, neurologic, neurocognitive, ophthalmologic, hepatic events, and TEAEs related to diabetes/diabetes complications was similar between alirocumab and control groups. In a prespecified analysis of phase 3 studies, adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and unstable angina requiring hospitalization) occurred in 1.8% alirocumab versus 2.6% placebo patients (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.43 to 1.11) and 2.8% alirocumab versus 1.5% ezetimibe patients (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 3.02). In conclusion, pooled safety data from 14 trials demonstrate that alirocumab is generally well tolerated with a favorable safety profile.
Background Statin intolerance limits many patients from achieving optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Current options for such patients include using a lower but ...tolerated dose of a statin and adding or switching to ezetimibe or other non-statin therapies. Methods ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE ( NCT01709513 ) compared alirocumab with ezetimibe in patients at moderate to high cardiovascular risk with statin intolerance (unable to tolerate ≥2 statins, including one at the lowest approved starting dose) due to muscle symptoms. A placebo run-in and statin rechallenge arm were included in an attempt to confirm intolerance. Patients (n = 361) received single-blind subcutaneous (SC) and oral placebo for 4 weeks during placebo run-in. Patients reporting muscle-related symptoms during the run-in were to be withdrawn. Continuing patients were randomized (2:2:1) to double-blind alirocumab 75 mg SC every 2 weeks (Q2W; plus oral placebo), ezetimibe 10 mg/d (plus SC placebo Q2W), or atorvastatin 20 mg/d (rechallenge; plus SC placebo Q2W) for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W at week 12 depending on week 8 LDL-C values. Primary end point was percent change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (intent-to-treat) for alirocumab vs ezetimibe. Results Baseline mean (standard deviation) LDL-C was 191.3 (69.3) mg/dL (5.0 1.8 mmol/L). Alirocumab reduced mean (standard error) LDL-C by 45.0% (2.2%) vs 14.6% (2.2%) with ezetimibe (mean difference 30.4% 3.1%, P < .0001). Skeletal muscle-related events were less frequent with alirocumab vs atorvastatin (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.38–0.99, P = .042). Conclusions Alirocumab produced greater LDL-C reductions than ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with fewer skeletal-muscle adverse events vs atorvastatin.
Evinacumab, an angiopoietin-like protein 3 monoclonal antibody, reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly in a Phase 2 study of patients with homozygous familial ...hypercholesterolemia. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1 study, we compared safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of evinacumab between healthy Japanese and Caucasian adults.
Subjects with LDL-C ≥2.6 and <4.1 mmol/L were enrolled to one of four dose cohorts: evinacumab subcutaneous (SC) 300 mg single dose, SC 300 mg once weekly for eight doses, intravenous (IV) 5 mg/kg, or IV 15 mg/kg once every 4 weeks for two doses. Each cohort comprised 24 subjects (12 Japanese; 12 Caucasian), randomized (3:1) to receive evinacumab or placebo within each ethnic group with a 24-week follow-up.
The safety profile of evinacumab (IV and SC) in both ethnicities was comparable with placebo, with no serious or severe treatment-emergent adverse events. Pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable between Japanese and Caucasian subjects across IV and SC groups. Mean calculated LDL-C decreased from baseline with both IV doses, beginning on day 3 up to week 8. Triglyceride changes observed with evinacumab IV were rapid (seen by day 2) and sustained up to week 8. Evinacumab SC doses also reduced LDL-C and triglyceride levels, although lower doses induced smaller changes. Evinacumab (IV and SC) reduced other lipids, including apolipoprotein B, versus placebo.
In both ethnicities, evinacumab (IV and SC) was generally well tolerated, exhibiting comparable pharmacokinetic profiles. Dose-related reductions in LDL-C and triglycerides were observed with evinacumab in both ethnic groups.
Display omitted
•The effects of evinacumab were compared between Japanese and Caucasian subjects.•Evinacumab exhibited a safety profile comparable to placebo in both ethnicities.•Evinacumab decreased LDL-C and triglyceride levels in both ethnicities.•Identical evinacumab doses are appropriate in both ethnicities due to similar PK/PD.•Evinacumab may help address the unmet need for LDL-C-lowering therapies in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH).
Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare and serious genetic condition characterized by premature cardiovascular disease due to severely elevated low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol ...(LDL‐C). HoFH primarily results from loss‐of‐function (LOF) mutations in the LDL receptor (LDLR), reducing LDL‐C clearance such that patients experience severe hypercholesterolemia, exacerbating the risk of developing cardiovascular events. Treatment options such as statins, lomitapide, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, and apheresis help lower LDL‐C; however, many patients with HoFH still fail to reach their target LDL‐C levels and many of these lipid‐lowering therapies are not indicated for pediatric use. Angiopoietin‐like protein 3 (ANGPTL3) has been identified as a target to treat elevated LDL‐C by acting as a natural inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL), enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of the triglyceride and phospholipid content of very low‐density lipoproteins. Persons heterozygous for LOF mutations in ANGPTL3 were reported to have lower LDL‐C than non‐carriers and lower risk of coronary artery disease. Evinacumab is a first‐in‐class human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to ANGPTL3 to prevent its inhibition of LPL and EL. In clinical trials, a 15 mg/kg intravenous dose every 4 weeks has shown a mean percent change from baseline in LDL‐C of ~50% in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with HoFH. This mini review article describes the mechanism of action of evinacumab, evinacumab population PK and PD modeling, and clinical development history of evinacumab for the treatment of HoFH.
Objective
Assess the risk of new and worsening cancer events among participants who received the lipid‐lowering therapy alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor.
Design
...Pooled post hoc analysis.
Setting
Six phase 3 or phase 4 placebo‐controlled randomised trials with alirocumab.
Participants
A total of 24,070 patients from the safety population with complete dosing data (alirocumab, n = 12,533; placebo, n = 11,537).
Intervention
Alirocumab 75 mg, alirocumab 150 mg, alirocumab 75 mg increasing to 150 mg if low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol <50 mg/dL not achieved, or placebo, all every 2 weeks. All participants received background high‐intensity or maximum‐tolerated statin therapy.
Outcomes and Measures
The first new or worsening incident cancer events were assessed during the treatment‐emergent adverse event period. Four outcomes were evaluated: any‐neoplasm, malignant neoplasms, broad definition of hormone‐sensitive cancers, and stricter definition of hormone‐sensitive cancers. Sub‐distribution hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a competing risk framework, with death as a competing risk.
Results
Considering both treatment arms in aggregate, 969 (4.03%), 779 (3.24%), 178 (0.74%) and 167 (0.69%) patients developed any neoplasm, malignant neoplasms, broad definition of hormone‐sensitive cancer and strict definition of hormone‐sensitive cancer events, respectively. There was no significant difference in the risk of having any neoplasm in the alirocumab versus the placebo group (sub‐distribution hazards ratio 95% CI, 0.93 0.82–1.1; p = 0.28). A nominally lower risk of having any neoplasms with alirocumab was observed among subjects aged ≥64 years (sub‐distribution hazards ratio 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70–0.99).
Conclusions
Intensive low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering with a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor combined with statin does not appear to increase the risk of new or worsening cancer events.
The risk of new and worsening cancer events was assessed among participants who received the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab combined with a statin. Our results demonstrated that intensive low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering does not appear to increase the risk of new or worsening cancer events.
PDF
