Observational evidence suggests that mask wearing mitigates transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is uncertain if this observed association arises through ...protection of uninfected wearers (protective effect), via reduced transmission from infected mask wearers (source control), or both.
To assess whether recommending surgical mask use outside the home reduces wearers' risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a setting where masks were uncommon and not among recommended public health measures.
Randomized controlled trial (DANMASK-19 Danish Study to Assess Face Masks for the Protection Against COVID-19 Infection). (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04337541).
Denmark, April and May 2020.
Adults spending more than 3 hours per day outside the home without occupational mask use.
Encouragement to follow social distancing measures for coronavirus disease 2019, plus either no mask recommendation or a recommendation to wear a mask when outside the home among other persons together with a supply of 50 surgical masks and instructions for proper use.
The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis. The secondary outcome was PCR positivity for other respiratory viruses.
A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%). The between-group difference was -0.3 percentage point (95% CI, -1.2 to 0.4 percentage point;
= 0.38) (odds ratio, 0.82 CI, 0.54 to 1.23;
= 0.33). Multiple imputation accounting for loss to follow-up yielded similar results. Although the difference observed was not statistically significant, the 95% CIs are compatible with a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection.
Inconclusive results, missing data, variable adherence, patient-reported findings on home tests, no blinding, and no assessment of whether masks could decrease disease transmission from mask wearers to others.
The recommendation to wear surgical masks to supplement other public health measures did not reduce the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate among wearers by more than 50% in a community with modest infection rates, some degree of social distancing, and uncommon general mask use. The data were compatible with lesser degrees of self-protection.
The Salling Foundations.
•First study in PFKD to investigate fat and glucose metabolism with stable isotope techniques.•Triheptanoin treatment had no effect on heart rate or improvement of FAO during exercise.•Triheptanoin ...treatment increased plasma palmitate production during exercise.
Phosphofructokinase deficiency (PFKD) is a rare disorder of glycogen metabolism. The lack of phosphofructokinase activity blocks the oxidative pathway from glucose and glycogen to pyruvate. Patients suffer from myopathy, exercise intolerance, and myoglobinuria. Currently, there is no specific treatment for PFKD. We hypothesized that 2 weeks treatment with triheptanoin could improve oxidative metabolism during exercise by bypassing the blocked pyruvate generation in PFKD. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Three genetically verified patients completed two treatment periods of 14 days each with triheptanoin (0.3–1 g × kg−1 × day−1) or placebo liquid. Primary outcomes were heart rate, fatty acid and total oxidation measured via stable isotope and indirect calorimetry methodology during submaximal exercise. Triheptanoin did not improve the primary outcome heart rate during submaximal exercise compared to placebo. Palmitate oxidation was increased during submaximal exercise in one patient but did not increase in the two other patients during triheptanoin treatment. Palmitate production and palmitate utilization increased during exercise and increased to a greater extent with triheptanoin treatment in all three patients. This study suggests that triheptanoin treatment has no effect on heart rate or exercise performance despite increased palmitate production and utilization in patients with PFKD.
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), progresses globally, and means to reduce the transmission are needed. In the ...community, the use of face masks is increasing world-wide, but documentation for the efficacy of this remedy is lacking. This trial investigates whether the use of face masks in the community will reduce wearers' risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
This study will be a two-arm, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. We will include adults (>18 years of age) without prior confirmed COVID-19 or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19, who spend more than three hours per day outside the home with exposure to other people. A total of 6,000 participants are randomly assigned 1:1 to use face masks or not for a 30-day period during the pandemic. Participants will perform self-testing; quick test for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG)) (the Livzon lateral flow test) and oropharyngeal/nasal swabs for viral detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primary endpoint following the 30-day study period is the difference in the number of SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals between the two study groups as assessed by a positive nasopharyngeal swap, a positive antibody test or a hospital-based diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
We will study whether a face mask protects the wearer of the mask against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The findings are expected to apply to the present pandemic and to future viral outbreaks and to provide evidence for authority recommendations across the world.
This study was funded by Salling Fondene.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04337541.
PDF
