Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is one of the leading causes of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has ...shown promise in managing GVHD. However, cyclophosphamide has known cardiac toxicity, and few studies have evaluated the cardiac toxicities that arise after PTCy. We completed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent matched-donor allo-HCT at our institution and who received PTCy- or non-PTCy–based GVHD prophylaxis, with the goal of determining the incidence of cardiac toxicities up to 100 days after allo-HCT. We included 585 patients in our analysis and found that 38 (6.5%) experienced cardiac toxicity after allo-HCT. The toxicities included arrhythmias (n = 21), heart failure (n = 14), pericardial effusion (n = 10), and myocardial infarction or ischemia (n = 7). Patients who received PTCy had a 7.4% incidence of cardiac toxicity, whereas non-PTCy recipients had an incidence of 5.8% (P = .4). We found that age >55 years (P = .02) and a history of hypertension (P = .01), arrhythmia (P = .003), diabetes (P = .04), and cardiac comorbidities (P < .001) were significant predictors of cardiac toxicity, whereas none of the preparative and GVHD prophylaxis regimens were predictive. From these findings, we proposed the use of a Cardiac Risk Stratification Score to quantify the risk of cardiac toxicity after allo-HCT. We found that a higher score correlated with an incidence of cardiac toxicity. Furthermore, the development of cardiac toxicity was associated with worse 1-year overall survival (OS) and NRM. The use of PTCy was associated with improvements in 1-year OS and NRM rates.
•The incidence of acute cardiac toxicity remains low and manageable after matched allo-HCT in the era of PTCy prophylaxis.•Older age, hypertension, arrhythmia, diabetes, and cardiac comorbidities increase this risk of cardiac toxicity but PTCy did not.
Display omitted
Older patients are increasingly undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. A relevant question is whether outcomes can be improved with a younger allele-level 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated ...donor (MUD) rather than an older HLA-matched sibling (MSD). Accordingly, transplants in leukemia/lymphoma patients age ≥50 years were analyzed comparing outcomes for recipients of MSD ≥50 (n = 1415) versus MUD <50 years (n = 757). Risks of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grade 2 to 4 (hazard ratio HR, 1.63; P < .001), 3 to 4 (HR, 1.85; P < .001), and chronic GVHD (HR, 1.48; P < .0001) were higher after MUD compared with MSD transplants. The effect of donor type on nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and overall mortality was associated with performance score. For patients with scores of 90 or 100, NRM (HR, 1.42; P = .001), relapse (HR, 1.45; P < .001), and overall mortality (HR, 1.28; P = .001) risks were higher after MUD transplants. For patients with scores below 90, NRM (HR, 0.96; P = .76), relapse (HR, 0.86; P = .25), and overall mortality (HR, 0.90; P = .29) were not significantly different after MUD and MSD transplants. These data favor an MSD over a MUD in patients age ≥50 years.
•HLA-matched siblings are better than HLA-matched unrelated donors for patients with good performance scores•Survival rates are comparable after HLA-matched sibling and unrelated donor transplantations for patients with poor performance scores
Summary
Post‐transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is an effective strategy to prevent graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) after haploidentical haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We determined ...the efficacy of PTCy‐based GVHD prophylaxis in human leucocyte antigen (HLA)‐mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HCT. We analysed 113 adult patients with high‐risk haematological malignancies who underwent one‐antigen MMUD transplantation between 2009 and 2013. Of these, 41 patients received PTCy, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) for GVHD prophylaxis; 72 patients received conventional prophylaxis with anti‐thymocyte globulin, tacrolimus and methotrexate. Graft source was primarily bone marrow (83% PTCy vs. 63% conventional group). Incidence of grade II–IV (37% vs. 36%, P = 0·8) and grade III–IV (17% vs. 12%, P = 0·5) acute GVHD was similar at day 100. However, the incidence of grade II‐IV acute GVHD by day 30 was significantly lower in the PTCy group (0% vs. 15%, P = 0·01). Median time to neutrophil (18 days vs. 12 days, P < 0·001) and platelet (25·5 days vs. 18 days, P = 0·05) engraftment was prolonged in PTCy group. Rates of graft failure, chronic GVHD, 2‐year non‐relapse mortality, relapse, progression‐free survival or overall survival were similar. Our results demonstrate that PTCy, tacrolimus and MMF for GVHD prophylaxis is safe and produced similar results as conventional prophylaxis in patients with one antigen HLA‐MMUD HCT.
Allogeneic SCT for older patients remains challenging at least in part due to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and higher non-relapse mortality (NRM). We conducted a prospective pilot study primarily ...for older patients undergoing matched unrelated donor (MUD) SCT using a reduced-intensity (RIC) melphalan-based conditioning and post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Twenty-two patients (median age 64, IQR 58, 66) underwent RIC MUD SCT for high-risk hematological malignancies including AML/MDS (73%), CML/MPD (18%), and other (10%). Two (9%) patients had early death; the rest (100%) engrafted. After a median follow-up of 17 months, 11 patients were alive and disease-free with an estimated 2-year progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of 48%. The cumulative incidences of grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day + 100 and 2-years were 32 and 4%, and 59 and 24%, respectively. No cases of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were noted. However, late acute GVHD was observed in 6 (27%) patients. In conclusion, RIC MUD SCT with melphalan-based conditioning and PTCy-based GVHD-based prophylaxis for older patients appears effective in controlling relapse. While cGVHD was not seen and early aGVHD appears controllable, a significant proportion developed late aGVHD responsible for higher NRM seen in these patients.
Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is associated with older age and an increased risk of myeloid malignancies and cardiovascular complications. We analyzed donor DNA samples in patients with AML/MDS who ...underwent first allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) to investigate the association between donor CH and transplant outcomes. We performed targeted deep sequencing of 300 genes on donor blood samples and identified CH with the minimum variant allele frequency of 2%. Among 363 donors, 65 (18%) had CH. The most frequently mutated genes were DNMT3A (31 of 65; 48%), TET2 (16 of 65; 25%), PPM1D (5 of 65, 8%), and ASXL1 (7 of 65; 11%). Transplant outcomes: time to neutrophil and platelet recovery, relapse incidence, transplant-related mortality and progression-free survival, were comparable by donor CH. However, risk of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) at 6 months after transplant was higher with donor CH vs. without donor CH (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.4, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.6-3.6, p < 0.001 and HR = 3.8, 95% CI = 1.6-8.9, p = 0.003). In this homogenous population of AML/MDS patients, donor CH was associated with increased risk of grade II-IV and III-IV aGvHD. Further studies to investigate the mechanisms of increased aGvHD and therapeutic interventions to improve aGvHD in the context of donor CH are warranted.
We investigated the impact of donor age (younger ≤35 years vs. older >35 years) after accounting for other non‐HLA and HLA factors on outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing ...HLA‐haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 790). The effect differed by conditioning—partly related to the differences in the recipient age in myeloablative (MAC; median 46 years) versus reduced‐intensity/non‐myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA; median 61 years) groups. With MAC (n = 320), donor age had no impact on acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD), but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio HR: 1.6, 95% confidence interval CI: 1.10–2.30, p = .02) independent of recipient age and other factors. Donor age had no impact on either relapse or non‐relapse mortality (NRM). The impact of donor/recipient age on overall survival changed over time. Older donors were associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>6 months) in younger recipients (≤ 50 years; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.03–4.6, p = .04) but not older recipients. With RIC/NMA (n = 470), neither recipient's nor donor's age influenced the risk of GVHD. Donor age had no significant impact on the risk of relapse, but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.02–2.6, p = .04) independent of recipient age. Older donor age was associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>9 months) in older recipients (>50 years; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.0–2.67; p = .049) but not in younger recipients. Donor selection based on donor age may require a tailored approach for a particular recipient.
Background
There have been concerns regarding increased peritransplantation complications, especially severe acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD), in patients with prior use of checkpoint ...inhibitors (CPI) before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
Methods
The authors performed a retrospective study of 43 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes who were treated with an antiprogrammed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) (32 patients) or anticytotoxic T‐lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA‐4) (9 patients) blockade or both (2 patients) prior to HSCT with the primary outcome of aGVHD by day 100 after HSCT. Outcome analyses were stratified by GVHD prophylaxis as use of post‐HSCT cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (22 patients) or not (non‐PTCy) (21 patients).
Results
The PTCy group demonstrated a trend toward lower grade 3 to 4 aGVHD when compared with the non‐PTCy group (5% vs 22%), although the rates of grade 2 to 4 aGVHD were comparable (49% vs 56%). The interval between CPI and HSCT did not appear to impact the incidence of aGVHD. However, a higher incidence of grade 3 to 4 aGVHD was observed in patients who received >4 treatments of CPI prior to HSCT if they were not given PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis (43% vs 12%). Matched control analyses using patients with no prior use of CPI confirmed the increase in grade 3 to 4 aGVHD with those agents. However, that increased risk was limited to patients who did not receive PTCy and was not observed in patients who received PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis. Despite persistent improvement in GVHD with the use of PTCy, disease control was not compromised and progression‐free survival at 1 year was found to be superior for patients treated with PTCy compared with those not receiving PTCy among patients with prior use of CPI (55% vs 22%).
Conclusions
The results of the current study indicated that HSCT with prior use of CPI appears feasible in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes and the use of PTCy as GVHD prophylaxis improves outcomes.
The use of checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and/or myelodysplastic syndromes affects transplantation outcomes, with an especially increased incidence of grade 3 to 4 acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD). The use of post‐HSCT cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis in patients treated with CPI prior to transplantation is found to lead to improved transplantation outcomes, including grade 3 to 4 aGVHD.
PDF
