The Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Pilot Study is a prospective registry designed to describe the clinical epidemiology of patients undergoing an atrial fibrillation (AFib) ablation, and the ...diagnostic/therapeutic processes applied across Europe. The aims of the 1-year follow-up were to analyse how centres assess in routine clinical practice the success of the procedure and to evaluate the success rate and long-term safety/complications.
Seventy-two centres in 10 European countries were asked to enrol 20 consecutive patients undergoing a first AFib ablation procedure. A web-based case report form captured information on pre-procedural, procedural, and 1-year follow-up data. Between October 2010 and May 2011, 1410 patients were included and 1391 underwent an AFib ablation (98.7%). A total of 1300 patients (93.5%) completed a follow-up control 367 ± 42 days after the procedure. Arrhythmia documentation was done by an electrocardiogram in 76%, Holter-monitoring in 52%, transtelephonic monitoring in 8%, and/or implanted systems in 4.5%. Over 50% became asymptomatic. Twenty-one per cent were re-admitted due to post-ablation arrhythmias. Success without antiarrhythmic drugs was achieved in 40.7% of patients (43.7% in paroxysmal AF; 30.2% in persistent AF; 36.7% in long-lasting persistent AF). A second ablation was required in 18% of the cases and 43.4% were under antiarrhythmic treatment. Thirty-three patients (2.5%) suffered an adverse event, 272 (21%) experienced a left atrial tachycardia, and 4 patients died (1 haemorrhagic stroke, 1 ventricular fibrillation in a patient with ischaemic heart disease, 1 cancer, and 1 of unknown cause).
The AFib Ablation Pilot Study provided crucial information on the epidemiology, management, and outcomes of catheter ablation of AFib in a real-world setting. The methods used to assess the success of the procedure appeared at least suboptimal. Even in this context, the 12-month success rate appears to be somewhat lower to the one reported clinical trials.
Nephrotoxicity of intravenous contrast media is more frequent and striking in patients with risk factors, the major one being preexisting chronic renal insufficiency. New nonionic low-osmolal ...contrast media allegedly have less nephrotoxicity than the traditional ionic high-osmolal ones. This was tested for two contrast media in a group of 18 patients with stable chronic renal insufficiency. The urinary excretion of two brush-border enzymes (alanine aminopeptidase, AAP, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, gamma-GT) and of a lysosomal enzyme (N-acetyl-beta glucosaminidase, NAG), functional markers of tubular injury, were measured before and after intravenous urography with an ionic high-osmolal radiocontrast medium, meglumine sodium diatrizoate, or with a non ionic low-osmolal one, iopamidol. Urinary NAG excretion did not change significantly after administration of either contrast media. Urinary AAP and gamma-GT excretion increased significantly (p less than 0.01) after diatrizoate. After iopamidol, only gamma-GT excretion increased significantly (p less than 0.05). Our data suggest that the nonionic low-osmolal radiocontrast medium iopamidol is less toxic to tubules than the ionic high-osmolal medium diatrizoate and that the brush-border enzymes AAP and gamma-GT are sensitive markers for this toxicity.
The prothrombotic effects of nonionic contrast media (NICM) have been evaluated in both biological and clinical studies. The question of whether there is a higher risk of thromboembolism during ...angiography with NICM than with ionic contrast media (ICM) has not yet been answered, nor has the precise role of the angiographic procedure per se in such complications been determined. The present study was performed to compare in vivo the potential prothrombotic effects during cardiac angiography of an NICM with those of an ICM, to estimate the effects of the procedure per se, and to assess how long these effects might be maintained. We measured blood levels of three markers of activation of blood coagulation: thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) complexes, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), and the split product of fibrin, D-dimer, before and after coronary angiography in three groups of patients. In group 1, 14 patients underwent coronary angiography with the NICM iopamidol 370. In group 2, 10 patients underwent coronary angiography with the ICM ioxaglate. In group 3, 10 patients were evaluated immediately after cardiac catheterization, before the injection of contrast material, as controls. No statistically significant differences between the three groups were found in TAT, F1 + 2, or D-dimer levels at different times before and after coronary angiography. There was a trend toward a transient increase in TAT levels after coronary angiography with iopamidol, which at first suggested a possible brief activation of hemostasis with this NICM, but a similar trend was also seen in the control group. We hypothesize that not only the type of contrast material, but also the angiographic procedure per se and patient-related factors all play roles in determining a prothrombotic state during coronary angiography.
PDF
