Abstract Background To evaluate the correlation between the side of positive biopsy (Bx) and the risk of lymph-node metastases (LNMs) on each side and to quantify the risk of contralateral LNMs in ...patients with unilateral positive biopsy. Methods We analyzed the outcomes of 1599 patients with complete data regarding the sides of positive Bx and LN (lymph-node). By dividing each prostate into two separate sides, we assessed the accuracy of the side-specific Bx details in determining the side of positive nodes; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) (AUCs) was used. For patients with unilateral positive Bx, we assessed the risk of homolateral and contralateral LNMs according to the number of total Bx taken and the preoperative risk of LN invasion. Results Considering the 3198 prostate sides, there was a strict correlation between the side of positive Bx and the side of LNMs. The ratio of positive/total Bx was more informative than the number of positive core. The AUC for ipsilateral LNMs was significantly higher than that for contralateral LNMs ( P = 0.039). In the 805 patients with unilateral positive Bx, the percentage of contralateral LNMs was >30% even considering a more meticulous biopsy scheme and increased in the patients at a higher clinical risk for LN invasion. Conclusion PCa preferentially metastasizes to ipsilateral LNs but >30% of contralateral LNMs are present. A unilateral LN dissection that is limited to the tumor-bearing side of the gland should not be recommended because of the substantial risk of missing contralateral metastases.
Aim of this study is to provide our results after long-term active surveillance (AS) protocol for small renal masses (SRMs), and to report the outcomes of patients who remained in AS compared to ...those who underwent delayed surgical intervention.
We retrospectively reviewed our database of 58 patients diagnosed with 60 contrast enhancing SRMs suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). All patients had clinical and radiological follow-up every 6 months. We evaluated the differences between patients who remained on AS and those who underwent surgical delayed intervention.
The mean age was 75 years, the mean follow-up was 88.5 months. The median initial tumor size at presentation was 2.6cm, and the median estimated tumor volume was 8.7cm(3). The median linear growth rate of the cohort was 0.7cm/year, and the median volumetric growth rate was 8.8 cm(3)/year. Death for metastatic disease occurred in 2 patients (3.4%). No correlation was found between initial tumor size and size growth rate. The mean linear and volumetric growth rates of the group of patients who underwent surgery was higher than in those who remained on surveillance (1.9 vs. 0.4cm/year and 16.1 vs. 4.6 cm(3)/year, respectively; P<.001).
Most of SRMs demonstrate to have an indolent course and low metastatic potential. Malignant disease could have faster linear and volumetric growth rates, thus suggesting the need for a delayed surgical intervention. In properly selected patients with low life-expectancy, AS could be a reasonable option in the management of SRMs.