Background In 2006, we reported results of a randomized trial of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR), comparing primary diaphragm repair (PR) with primary repair buttressed with a ...biologic prosthesis (small intestinal submucosa SIS). The primary endpoint, radiologic hiatal hernia (HH) recurrence, was higher with PR (24%) than with SIS buttressed repair (9%) after 6 months. The second phase of this trial was designed to determine the long-term durability of biologic mesh-buttressed repair. Methods We systematically searched for the 108 patients in phase I of this study to assess current clinical symptoms, quality of life (QOL) and determine ongoing durability of the repair by obtaining a follow-up upper gastrointestinal series (UGI) read by 2 radiologists blinded to treatment received. HH recurrence was defined as the greatest measured vertical height of stomach being at least 2 cm above the diaphragm. Results At median follow-up of 58 months (range 42 to 78 mo), 10 patients had died, 26 patients were not found, 72 completed clinical follow-up (PR, n = 39; SIS, n = 33), and 60 repeated a UGI (PR, n = 34; SIS, n = 26). There were 20 patients (59%) with recurrent HH in the PR group and 14 patients (54%) with recurrent HH in the SIS group (p = 0.7). There was no statistically significant difference in relevant symptoms or QOL between patients undergoing PR and SIS buttressed repair. There were no strictures, erosions, dysphagia, or other complications related to the use of SIS mesh. Conclusions LPEHR results in long and durable relief of symptoms and improvement in QOL with PR or SIS. There does not appear to be a higher rate of complications or side effects with biologic mesh, but its benefit in reducing HH recurrence diminishes at long-term follow-up (more than 5 years postoperatively) or earlier.
Background Recent years have brought important developments in preoperative imaging and use of laparoscopic staging of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC). There are few data about the ...optimal combination of preoperative studies to accurately identify resectable patients. Study Design We conducted a statewide review of all patients with surgically managed PAC from 1996 to 2003 using data from the Oregon State Cancer Registry, augmented with clinical information from primary medical record review. We documented the use of all staging modalities, including CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and laparoscopy. Primary outcomes included resection with curative intent. The association between staging modalities, clinical features, and resection was measured using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results There were 298 patients from 24 hospitals who met the eligibility criteria. Patients were staged using a combination of CT (98%), laparoscopy (29%), and endoscopic ultrasonography (32%). The overall proportion of patients who went to surgical exploration and were resected was 87%. Of patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy, metastatic disease that precluded resection was discovered in 24 (27.6%). For patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and were not resected, vascular invasion was the most common determinant of unresectability (56.6%). In multivariate analysis, preoperative weight loss and surgeon decision to use laparoscopy predicted unresectability at laparotomy. Conclusions This population-based study demonstrates that surgeons appear to use laparoscopy in a subset of patients at high risk for metastatic disease. The combination of current staging techniques is associated with a high proportion of resectability for patients taken to surgical exploration. With current imaging modalities, selective application of laparoscopy with a dual-phase CT scan as the cornerstone of staging is a sound clinical approach to evaluate pancreatic cancer patients for potential resectability.
Background: Necrotizing pancreatitis is a poorly understood process that has been treated by a variety of surgical approaches. Despite advances in operative interventions and critical care, this ...disease often requires prolonged resource allocation and continues to cause substantial morbidity, with mortality rates ranging from 11% to 40%. We report on our recent series of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis and our experience with the use of an absorbable mesh in a subset of these patients to facilitate their surgical care.
Study Design: From 1985 to 1994, 40 patients with culture-proved necrotizing pancreatitis underwent operative debridement and drainage. Surgical outcomes were compared among patients who underwent a single debridement and drainage, those requiring multiple procedures, and those having placement of polyglycolic acid mesh.
Results: The overall hospital mortality rate was 30%. The mean length of hospital stay was 35 days. The rate of infected pancreatic necrosis was 60%, with a mortality rate of 45% in patients having infected pancreatic tissue at surgery. Patients without infected pancreatic tissue at surgery had a mortality rate of 6% (p = 0.03). Eleven patients requiring multiple operations had placement of absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh. Clinic followup was possible in five of six survivors who underwent mesh closure. Abdominal-wall hernias developed in two patients and were repaired electively, and three patients had spontaneous closure by granulation without abdominal-wall hernias. The average number of operations for debridement and drainage was 2.5 (range, 1–15). Patients with limited pancreatic necrosis required a single operative debridement and drainage, and this was associated with improved outcomes.
Conclusions: Necrotizing pancreatitis remains an important challenge in surgical care. It requires prolonged hospitalization, costly resources, and causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Our patients with infected pancreatic necrosis or clinical deterioration underwent open staged necrosectomy and debridement. Those patients requiring repeat laparotomy often had placement of polyglycolic acid mesh. This provided open drainage of the abdominal cavity and simplified further care by allowing easy abdominal access for repeat drainage procedures, often performed in the intensive care unit. These patients had a high rate of fistula formation, which may be decreased by changes in wound care. Polyglycolic acid mesh is a useful adjunct in the surgical care of selected patients with necrotizing pancreatitis.
Reply Oelschlager, Brant K., MD, FACS; Pellegrini, Carlos A., MD, FACS; Mitsumori, Lee M., MD ...
Journal of the American College of Surgeons,
2012, Letnik:
215, Številka:
1
Journal Article