Abstract Purpose Levothyroxine (LT4) is a drug with a narrow therapeutic index, applied in small amounts (micrograms), which makes interactions in the absorption phase clinically significant. The ...main aim of this article was to review and present the latest information on factors that affect the gastrointestinal absorption of this drug. Methods Relevant data were collected by using the MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Scopus databases with the key words levothyroxine and absorption . Searches were not limited to specific publication types, study designs, dates, or languages. The reports were highly variable in the amount of information provided regarding study design and methods. Because of the heterogeneity of studies, no statistical analysis was performed. Findings Many gastrointestinal disorders, such as celiac disease, atrophic gastritis, lactose intolerance, and Helicobacter pylori infection, may impede the absorption of levothyroxine. During treatment of these disorders, it is necessary to monitor serum thyroid-stimulating hormone and free T4 values to reduce the risk of developing iatrogenic hyperthyroidism. Soybeans and coffee have the greatest impact on the reduction of absorption, whereas vitamin C has the ability to increase it. Conversely, the effect of dietary fiber on the absorption of LT4 is not yet fully understood; further research is needed on this topic. A decrease in the absorption of LT4 is established and clinically significant when administered concomitantly with cholestyramine, colesevelam, lanthanum, calcium carbonate, calcium citrate, calcium acetate, iron sulfate, ciprofloxacin, aluminum hydroxide, sevelamer, or proton pump inhibitors. This effect should be taken into consideration when prescribing these drugs concomitantly with LT4. The effects of Giardia lamblia infection and the influence of orlistat, polystyrene sulfonate, raloxifene, and simethicone on absorption of LT4 have been poorly documented. For bariatric surgery, sucralfate and H2 -antagonist interactions are not well founded or contradictory evidence is available regarding their existence; additional research should be conducted. Implications The majority of the interactions are clinically significant. They are based on the LT4 adsorption on interfering substances in the digestive tract, as well as a consequently reduced amount of the drug available for absorption. These interactions can be avoided by separating the administration of LT4 and the interfering substance.
Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) are highly prevalent in the elderly and may have adverse effects on health-related outcomes. Their ...occurrence and clinical and prognostic associations in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are unknown. We retrospectively evaluated polypharmacy, PIMs, and DDIs in a cohort of 124 MPN patients (essential thrombocythemia, ET = 63, polycythemia vera, PV = 44, myelofibrosis = 9, MPN unclassifiable = 8) from a single community hematology practice. There were 761 drug prescriptions with a median of five prescribed medications per patient. Polypharmacy, at least one PIM (calculated for persons >60 years of age,
= 101), and at least one DDI were recorded in 76 (61.3%), 46 (45.5%), and 77 (62.1%) of patients, respectively. Seventy-four (59.6%) and twenty-one (16.9%) patients had at least one C or at least one D interaction, respectively. Among other associations, polypharmacy and DDIs were associated with older age, management of disease-related symptoms, osteoarthritis/osteoporosis, and different CV disorders. In multivariate analyses adjusted for clinically meaningful parameters, both polypharmacy and DDIs were significantly associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and time to thrombosis (TTT), whereas PIMs had no significant associations with neither OS nor TTT. There were no associations with bleeding or transformation risks. Polypharmacy, DDIs, and PIMs are very frequent among MPN patients and may have important clinical associations.
The presence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk in the general population. Chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), essential thrombocythemia ...(ET) and polycythemia vera (PV), are characterized by clonal myeloproliferation, chronic inflammatory state, and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The aim of this single-center study was to analyze clinical associations and the potential prognostic impact of SLD in ET and PV patients. We retrospectively included 108 patients (64 ET and 44 PV); median age was 70.5 years (range 21–92), 68 (63 %) were females, and the median follow-up time was 69 months. Baseline SLD presence was defined ultrasonographically and was detected in 25 (23.1 %) patients. There were no associations of SLD with any of the clinical and laboratory patient characterictics. Also, baseline ultrasonographic presence of SLD did not have an impact on future thrombotic, bleeding and disease transformation risk, nor patient survival. None of the patients experienced signs of liver failure during the follow-up. In conclusion, the presence of SLD in ET and PV patients does not seem to have major clinical implications. Therefore, patients may be advised about the generally harmless nature of SLD when occurring in the MPN context.
•Prevalence of steatotic liver disease (SLD) in ET and PV is similar to that in the general population.•The presence of SLD did not correlate with any of the MPN-related disease features.•SLD did not affect thrombotic, bleeding and transformation risk, nor survival.
Citations are used to assess the importance of authors, articles and journals in the scientific community, but do not examine how they affect general public journal readership. The Altmetric ...Attention Score (AAS) is a new metric for measuring media attention of the published paper.
We examined cardiovascular (CV) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), published in the 3 highest Web of Science Impact Factor journals (Journal Citation Reports 2019: category "Medicine, General & Internal") and in the 3 highest Web of Science Impact Factor CV journals (Journal Citation Reports 2019: category "Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems"), through the calendar year of 2017, 2018 and 2019. The primary outcomes were the assessment of the difference between number of citations and AAS among positive and negative CV RCTs.
Among the included 262 RCTs, more positive CV RCTs were published (
= 0.002). There was no significant statistical difference between the positive and negative trials, considering the number of citations (
= 0.61). Interestingly, positive trials had a tendency towards a higher AAS (
= 0.058). The correlation between the AAS and the number of citations was moderate positively correlated (ρ = 0.47,
< 0.001).
We did not find any differences between CV RCTs with positive vs CV RCTs with negative results considering the number of their citations. A tendency towards a higher AAS among positive CV RCTs could indicate higher activity on social media regarding CV trials with positive results. A higher number of published positive CV RCTs among all published CV RCTs could indicate the presence of publication bias but further investigation of unpublished RCTs in trial registries (e.g., clinicaltrials.gov) is needed.
PDF
