Background
This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS
®
) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded ...recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS
®
protocol.
Methods
A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system.
Results
All recommendations on ERAS
®
protocol items are based on best available evidence; good-quality trials; meta-analyses of good-quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly.
Conclusions
The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS
®
Society in this comprehensive consensus review.
Background
This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colonic surgery and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced perioperative ...protocol.
Methods
Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group.
Results
For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (quality of evidence and recommendations according to the GRADE system).
Conclusions
Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for colonic surgery.
Background
This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in rectal/pelvic surgery, and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced recovery ...protocol.
Methods
Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group.
Results
For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (evidence grade: high or moderate).
Conclusions
Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for rectal surgery.
Background
Current guidance on the management of sepsis often applies to infection originating from abdominal or pelvic sources, which presents specific challenges and opportunities for efficient and ...rapid source control. Advances made in the past decade are presented in this article.
Methods
A qualitative systematic review was undertaken by searching standard literature databases for English‐language studies presenting original data on the clinical management of abdominal and pelvic complex infection in adults over the past 10 years. High‐quality studies relevant to five topical themes that emerged during review were included.
Results
Important developments and promising preliminary work are presented, relating to: imaging and other diagnostic modalities; antimicrobial therapy and the importance of antimicrobial stewardship; the particular challenges posed by fungal sepsis; novel techniques in percutaneous and endoscopic source control; and current issues relating to surgical source control and managing the abdominal wound. Logistical challenges relating to rapid access to cross‐sectional imaging, interventional radiology and operating theatres need to be addressed so that international benchmarks can be met.
Conclusion
Important advances have been made in the diagnosis, non‐operative and surgical control of abdominal or pelvic sources, which may improve outcomes in the future. Important areas for continued research include the diagnosis and therapy of fungal infection and the challenges of managing the open abdomen.
Early recognition and management key
Prevention of catheter related blood stream infections (CRBSI) and salvage of infected central venous catheters (CVC) are vital to maintaining long term venous access in patients needing home ...parenteral nutrition (HPN). It remains unclear as to whether patients are best trained for catheter care at home or in hospital or whether CRBSIs are lower if the patient self-cares for the CVC. Furthermore, there is minimal data on the longer term outcome following salvage of infected catheter and limited consensus on agreed protocols for catheter salvage.
We conducted a retrospective 5-year evaluation of CRBSI occurrence and CVC salvage outcomes in adult patients requiring HPN managed at a national UK Intestinal Failure Unit from 2012 to 2016. Prior to 2012, patients were primarily trained to administer PN in hospital; thereafter, patients underwent training at home.
A total of 134 CRBSI were recorded in 92 patients (62 patients with a single CRBSI and 30 patients with more than 1 CRBSI) in a cohort of 559 HPN patients, with a total of 1163 HPN years. The overall CRBSI rate was 0.31 per 1000 catheter days. CNS were the most common isolates (41/134 (30.5%)), followed by polymicrobial infections (14/134 (10.4%)), Klebsiella spp. (16/134 (11.9%)) and methicillin – sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 5/134 ((3.7%)). Salvage was not attempted in 34 cases due to methicillin – resistant (MRSA) infection (1/34), fungal infection (13/34) or clinical instability due to sepsis (20/34). Of the 100 cases where salvage was attempted, 67% were successful. 82.8% of CNS salvage attempts were successful; there was no difference in salvage rates between CNS CRBSIs salvaged with a 10-day (22/26) or 14-day protocol (7/9) (p = 0.4). CRBSI rate, in those cared for by trained home care nurses was the lowest at 0.270 (self care: 0.342 and non-medical carer (e.g. family member): 0.320) (p = 0.03).
We previously reported a sustained very low CRBSI rate in a large cohort of HPN patients in a national unit; we now further report that this is not influenced by training patients at home rather than in hospital but is influenced by the individual managing the catheter at home. CNS remains the primary cause of CRBSIs and can be successfully salvaged with a reduced duration of antibiotic therapy compared to our previous experience.
Objectives To estimate the incidence, nature and consequences of adverse events and preventable adverse events in Swedish hospitals. Design A three-stage structured retrospective medical record ...review based on the use of 18 screening criteria. Setting Twenty-eight Swedish hospitals. Population A representative sample (n = 1967) of the 1.2 million Swedish hospital admissions between October 2003 and September 2004. Main Outcome Measures Proportion of admissions with adverse events, the proportion of preventable adverse events and the types and consequences of adverse events. Results In total, 12.3% (n = 241) of the 1967 admissions had adverse events (95% CI, 10.8–13.7), of which 70% (n = 169) were preventable. Fifty-five percent of the preventable events led to impairment or disability, which was resolved during the admission or within 1 month from discharge, another 33% were resolved within 1 year, 9% of the preventable events led to permanent disability and 3% of the adverse events contributed to patient death. Preventable adverse events led to a mean increased length of stay of 6 days. Ten of the 18 screening criteria were sufficient to detect 90% of the preventable adverse events. When extrapolated to the 1.2 million annual admissions, the results correspond to 105 000 preventable adverse events (95% CI, 90 000–120 000) and 630 000 days of hospitalization (95% CI, 430 000–830 000). Conclusions This study confirms that preventable adverse events were common, and that they caused extensive human suffering and consumed a significant amount of the available hospital resources.
Summary Background This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in rectal/pelvic surgery, and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced ...recovery protocol. Methods Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group. Results For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (evidence grade: high or moderate). Conclusions Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) and International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for rectal surgery.
Summary Background This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colonic surgery and to provide graded recommendations for items for an evidenced-based enhanced ...perioperative protocol. Methods Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts. For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway, available English-language literature was examined, reviewed and graded. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group. Results For most of the protocol items, recommendations are based on good-quality trials or meta-analyses of good-quality trials (quality of evidence and recommendations according to the GRADE system). Conclusions Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative-care pathway, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) present a comprehensive evidence-based consensus review of perioperative care for colonic surgery.
PDF
