Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of angiosome targeted revascularization according to the revascularization method. Design Retrospective observational study. Materials and ...methods This study cohort comprised 744 consecutive patients who underwent infrapopliteal endovascular or surgical revascularization between January 2010 and July 2013. Differences in outcomes after bypass surgery and PTA were adjusted by estimating a propensity score, which was employed for one to one matching as well as adjusted analysis. Results Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that angiosome-targeted revascularization (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.02–1.65), bypass surgery (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.41–2.27), C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/dL (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.11–1.81), and the number of affected angiosomes (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.98) were independent predictors of improved wound healing. When adjusted for the number of affected angiosomes and C-reactive protein ≤10 mg/dL, angiosome-targeted bypass surgery was associated with a significantly higher rate of wound healing than non-angiosome-targeted angioplasty (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.61–3.20). This was confirmed in propensity score adjusted analysis (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.35–2.16). Among patients who underwent angiosome-targeted revascularization, the propensity score adjusted analysis showed that bypass surgery was associated with a significantly better rate of wound healing (HR 154, 95% CI 1.09–2.16) but similar limb salvage rates when compared with angioplasty (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.44–1.43). Conclusion Rates of wound healing and limb salvage in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) were significantly better after angiosome-targeted revascularization, bypass surgery achieving significantly better wound healing than angioplasty.
Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the impact of angiosome targeted (direct) revascularisation according to revascularisation method in patients with diabetes. Materials and methods This ...retrospective study cohort comprised 545 diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia and tissue loss (Rutherford 5, 6). All patients underwent infrapopliteal endovascular (PTA) or open surgical revascularisation between January 2008 and December 2013. Differences in the outcome after direct revascularisation, bypass surgery, and PTA were investigated by means of Cox proportional hazards analysis. The endpoints were wound healing, leg salvage, and amputation free survival. Results Overall, 60.3% of the ischaemic wounds healed during 1 year of follow-up. The highest wound healing rate was achieved after direct bypass (77%) and the worst after indirect PTA (52%). The Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the number of affected angiosomes <3 (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.01–1.84) was associated with improved wound healing, whereas wound healing was poorest after indirect PTA ( p = .001). When Cox proportional hazard analysis was adjusted for the number of affected angiosomes, direct bypass gave the best wound healing (p = 0.003). The overall amputation rate was 25.1% at 1 year of follow-up, and the Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that haemodialysis compared with patients with no haemodialysis (HR 2.55, 95% CI 1.49–4.38), C-reactive protein ≥10 mg/dL (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.45–2.90), atrial fibrillation (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05–2.26), and number of affected angiosomes >3 (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.24–2.46) were significantly associated with poor leg salvage. Direct PTA was associated with a lower rate of major amputation compared with indirect PTA (HR 0.57 95% CI 0.37–0.89). Conclusion In diabetics, indirect endovascular revascularisation leads to significantly worse wound healing and leg salvage rates compared with direct revascularisation. Therefore, endovascular procedures should be targeted according to the angiosome concept. In bypass surgery, however, the concept is of less value and the artery with the best runoff should be selected as the outflow artery.
PDF
