Reduction of immunosuppression (RI) is commonly used to treat posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in solid organ transplant recipients. We investigated the efficacy, safety and ...predictors of response to RI in adult patients with PTLD. Sixty‐seven patients were managed with RI alone and 30 patients were treated with surgical excision followed by adjuvant RI. The response rate to RI alone was 45% (complete response—37%, partial response—8%). The relapse rate in complete responders was 17%. Adjuvant RI resulted in a 27% relapse rate. The acute rejection rate following RI‐containing strategies was 32% and a second transplant was feasible without relapse of PTLD. The median survival was 44 months in patients treated with RI alone and 9.5 months in patients who remained on full immunosuppression (p = 0.07). Bulky disease, advanced stage and older age predicted lack of response to RI. Survival analysis demonstrated predictors of poor outcome—age, dyspnea, B symptoms, LDH level, hepatitis C, bone marrow and liver involvement. Patients with none or one of these factors had a 3‐year overall survival of 100% and 79%, respectively. These findings support the use of RI alone in low‐risk PTLD and suggest factors that predict response and survival.
The authors describe the response of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease to reduction of immunosuppression and analyze predictors of response and survival in a large single‐center cohort.
We examined the associations of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) status with characteristics and outcomes of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) by studying 176 adult solid organ ...transplant recipients diagnosed with PTLD between 1990 and 2013 (58 33% EBV‐negative; 118 67% EBV‐positive). The proportion of EBV‐negative cases increased over time from 10% (1990–1995) to 48% (2008–2013) (p < 0.001). EBV‐negative PTLD had distinct characteristics (monomorphic histology, longer latency) though high‐risk features (advanced stage, older age, high lactate dehydrogenase, central nervous system involvement) were not more common compared to EBV‐positive PTLD. In multivariable analysis, EBV negativity was not significantly associated with worse response to initial therapy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84; p = 0.75). The likelihood of achieving a complete remission (CR) was not significantly different for EBV‐negative versus EBV‐positive PTLD including when therapy was reduction of immunosuppression alone (35% vs. 43%, respectively, p = 0.60) or rituximab (43% vs. 47%, p = 1.0). EBV negativity was also not associated with worse overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.91; p = 0.71). Our findings indicate that EBV status is not prognostic or predictive of treatment response in adults with PTLD. The high proportion of EBV‐negative disease diagnosed in recent years highlights the need for new strategies for prevention and management of EBV‐negative PTLD.
In a study of 176 solid organ transplant recipients with posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, the authors show that the proportion of Epstein–Barr virus–negative cases has increased over time, but Epstein–Barr virus negativity is not associated with high‐risk features, worse response to initial therapy, or worse overall survival.
We present a pooled update of two large, multicenter MM-009 and MM-010 placebo-controlled randomized phase III trials that included 704 patients and assessed lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus ...dexamethasone plus placebo in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Patients in both studies were randomized to receive 25 mg daily oral lenalidomide or identical placebo, plus 40 mg oral dexamethasone. In this pooled analysis, using data up to unblinding (June 2005 for MM-009 and August 2005 for MM-010), treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone significantly improved overall response (60.6 vs 21.9%, P<0.001), complete response rate (15.0 vs 2.0%, P<0.001), time to progression (median of 13.4 vs 4.6 months, P<0.001) and duration of response (median of 15.8 months vs 7 months, P<0.001) compared with dexamethasone-placebo. At a median follow-up of 48 months for surviving patients, using data up to July 2008, a significant benefit in overall survival (median of 38.0 vs 31.6 months, P=0.045) was retained despite 47.6% of patients who were randomized to dexamethasone-placebo receiving lenalidomide-based treatment after disease progression or study unblinding. Low beta(2)-microglobulin and low bone marrow plasmacytosis were associated with longer survival. In conclusion, these data confirm the significant response and survival benefit with lenalidomide and dexamethasone.
Information regarding treatment of post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) beyond reduction in immunosuppression (RI) is limited. We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving rituximab ...and/or chemotherapy for PTLD for response, time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Thirty‐five patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty‐two underwent rituximab treatment, with overall response rate (ORR) 68%. Median TTF was not reached at 19 months and estimated OS was 31 months. In univariable analysis, Epstein‐Barr virus (EBV) positivity predicted response and TTF. LDH elevation predicted shorter OS. No patient died of rituximab toxicity and all patients who progressed underwent further treatment with chemotherapy. Twenty‐three patients received chemotherapy. ORR was 74%, median TTF was 10.5 months and estimated OS was 42 months. Prognostic factors for response included stage, LDH and allograft involvement by tumor. These factors and lack of complete response (CR) predicted poor survival. Twenty‐six percent of the patients receiving chemotherapy died of toxicity. Rituximab and chemotherapy are effective in patients with PTLD who fail or do not tolerate RI. While rituximab is well tolerated, toxicity of chemotherapy is marked. PTLD patients requiring therapy beyond RI should be considered for rituximab, especially with EBV‐positive disease. Chemotherapy should be reserved for patients who fail rituximab, have EBV‐negative tumors or need a rapid response.
Therapeutic options for patients with multiple myeloma whose disease has relapsed after a prior auto-SCT include novel biologic therapies, traditional chemotherapy or a second transplant, with no ...clear standard of care. Few published studies address the safety and efficacy of a second auto-SCT for relapsed disease. We reviewed the Abramson Cancer Center experience with salvage auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Forty-one patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at our institution; the median time between transplants was 37 months (range 3-91). The overall response rate in assessable patients was 55%, and treatment-related mortality was 7%. With a median follow-up time of 15 months, the median PFS was 8.5 months and the median overall survival (OS) was 20.7 months. In a multivariate analysis of OS, independent prognostic factors were >or=5 prior lines of therapy and time to progression after initial auto-SCT of <or=12 months. We conclude that in well-selected patients, salvage auto-SCT is safe and effective for relapsed myeloma.
This phase II pilot study determined the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab (Campath-1H; Burroughs Wellcome, United Kingdom) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), all of whom had ...previously received fludarabine and other chemotherapy regimens.
Twenty-four patients were treated with intravenous alemtuzumab at six centers in the United States. The target dose of 30 mg over 2 hours, three times weekly, was administered for up to 16 weeks. Responses were evaluated by an independent panel of experts using 1996 National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group criteria. Safety assessments included analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was not mandatory.
Eight patients (33%) achieved a major response (all partial remissions), with a median time to response of 3.9 months (range, 1.6 to 5.3 months). The median duration of response was 15.4 months (range, 4.6 to >or= 38.0 months), the median time to disease progression was 19.6 months (range, 7.7 to >or= 42.0 months), and the median survival time was 35.8 months (range, 8.8 to >or= 47.1 months). Acute infusion-related events, mainly grades 1 and 2, were most common and most severe in the first week. Ten patients (eight nonresponders and two responders) experienced major infections on-study. Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia was reported in two patients on-study; neither had received prophylaxis. Median CD4+ and CD8+ counts decreased and then began to increase by the end of the study, with further recovery by 1-month follow-up. One of 53 samples obtained from 10 patients had a low titer of alemtuzumab antibodies.
Alemtuzumab has significant activity in poor-prognosis, fludarabine-treated CLL patients. However, because of a relatively high incidence of opportunistic infections accompanying profound lymphopenia, future protocols should include mandatory prophylaxis.
In multiple myeloma, deletion of chromosome 13 (del(13)) is associated with poor prognosis regardless of treatment. This study analyzed the impact of del(13) status on response and survival following ...treatment with either bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone in patients in the SUMMIT and APEX trials. Additionally, matched-pairs subset analyses were conducted of patients with and without del(13), balanced for age and International Staging System parameters. In both SUMMIT and APEX, prognosis appeared to be poorer in bortezomib-treated patients with del(13) compared with patients with no del(13) by metaphase cytogenetics. In the SUMMIT and APEX matched-pairs analysis, response and survival appeared comparable in bortezomib-treated patients with or without del(13) by metaphase cytogenetics. However, patients with del(13) receiving dexamethasone in APEX appeared to have markedly decreased survival compared with those without del(13) by metaphase cytogenetics. These matched-pairs analyses suggest that bortezomib may overcome some of the poor impact of del(13) as an independent prognostic factor. However, sample sizes were very small; these findings require confirmation from further studies.
While EBV PCR is used in the management of PTLD, the optimal primer set, relative importance of intracellular versus free plasma EBV, and the baseline profile in an organ transplant population ...remains unclear. We performed a prospective 2‐arm trial utilizing an EBV PCR panel measuring LMP‐1, EBER‐1 and EBNA‐1 in both free plasma as well as intracellular whole blood. Control Arm A consisted of 31 lung transplant patients and Arm B consisted of 35 transplant patients being evaluated for possible PTLD. In Arm A, 1/31 (3%) patients developed a transient plasma EBV load. Thirteen of 31 (42%) had detectable intracellular EBV. In Arm B, 17 (49%) patients were diagnosed with PTLD. Thirteen (76%) had EBV‐positive PTLD with 12/13 (92%) having detectable EBV by PCR. The EBV PCR panel had a high sensitivity (92%), specificity (72%), positive predictive value (PPV) (71%) and negative predictive value (NPV) (93%) for diagnosing EBV‐positive PTLD and followed patients' clinical course well (p < 0.001). Comparing the individual PCR assays, plasma EBNA PCR was superior with high sensitivity (77%), specificity (100%), PPV (100%) and NPV (86%). We conclude that EBV PCR is a useful test for managing PTLD patients. While plasma EBNA PCR is the best single assay for diagnosing and monitoring PTLD, the complete PCR panel is superior for ruling out its presence.
This study determined that utilizing plasma as a specimen source and gene targets EBNA and EBER in EBV quantitative real‐time PCR assays provided the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing and monitoring PTLD. Therefore an assay that incorporates both gene targets would be the most successful in the management of PTLD patients.
Multiple myeloma is the most common indication for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (ASCT) in North America today. Stem cell procurement for ASCT has most commonly been ...performed with stem cell mobilization using colony-stimulating factors with or without prior chemotherapy. The target CD34+ cell dose to be collected as well as the number of apheresis performed varies throughout the country, but a minimum of 2 million CD34+ cells/kg has been traditionally used for the support of one cycle of high-dose therapy. With the advent of plerixafor (AMD3100) (a novel stem cell mobilization agent), it is pertinent to review the current status of stem cell mobilization for myeloma as well as the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in this disease. On June 1, 2008, a panel of experts was convened by the International Myeloma Foundation to address issues regarding stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in myeloma in the context of new therapies. The panel was asked to discuss a variety of issues regarding stem cell collection and transplantation in myeloma especially with the arrival of plerixafor. Herein, is a summary of their deliberations and conclusions.
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) represents a spectrum of Epstein-Barr virus-related (EBV) clinical diseases, from a benign mononucleosis-like illness to a fulminant non-Hodgkin's ...lymphoma. In the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PTLD is an often-fatal complication occurring relatively early after transplant. Risk factors for the development of PTLD are well established, and include HLA-mismatching, T-cell depletion, and the use of antilymphocyte antibodies as conditioning or treatment of graft-versus-host disease. Early recognition of PTLD is particularly important in the SCT setting, because PTLD in these patients tends to be rapidly progressive. Familiarity with the clinical features of PTLD and a heightened level of suspicion are critical for making the diagnosis. Surveillance techniques with EBV antibody titers and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may have a role in some high-risk settings. Immune-based therapies such as monoclonal anti-B-cell antibodies, interferon-alpha, and EBV-specific donor T cells, either as treatment for PTLD or as prophylaxis in high-risk patients, represent promising new directions in the treatment of this disease.
PDF
