Background Chronic urticaria is a frequent and debilitating skin disease. Its symptoms commonly fluctuate considerably from day to day. As of yet, the only reliable tool to assess disease activity is ...the Urticaria Activity Score, which prospectively documents the signs and symptoms of urticaria for several days. Objective We sought to develop and validate a novel patient-reported outcome instrument to retrospectively assess urticaria control, the Urticaria Control Test (UCT). Methods Potential UCT items were developed by using established methods (literature research and expert and patient involvement). Subsequently, item reduction was performed by using a combined approach, applying impact and regression analysis. The resulting UCT instrument was then tested for its validity, reliability, and screening accuracy. Results A 4-item UCT with a recall period of 4 weeks was developed based on 25 potential UCT items tested in 508 patients with chronic urticaria. A subsequent validation study with the 4-item UCT in 120 patients with chronic urticaria demonstrated that this new tool exhibits good convergent and known-groups validity, as well as excellent test-retest reliability. In addition, the screening accuracy to identify patients with urticaria with insufficiently controlled disease was found to be high. Conclusions The UCT is the first valid and reliable tool to assess disease control in patients with chronic urticaria (spontaneous and inducible). Its retrospective approach and simple scoring system make it an ideal instrument for the management of patients with chronic urticaria in clinical practice.
Cold urticaria is a potentially life-threatening disease and placebo treatment of patients does not provide protection from cold-induced systemic reactions including anaphylactic shock. Because the ...interim analysis showed marked clinical and statistical superiority of omalizumab compared with placebo, the study was terminated. ...omalizumab in doses of 150 mg and 300 mg resulted in a high rate of complete and partial responders in patients with cold urticaria and a pronounced overall reduction in disease activity. There were no visible differences between omalizumab and placebo; however, the viscosity of the 2 differed. ...a separate and independent unblinded study team, which did not engage in study-specific communication with the blinded study team, was responsible for the preparation and injection of the study drug. ...a sample size calculation based on previous data was not possible.
Sleep disorders in dermatology – a comprehensive review Mann, Caroline; Gorai, Surajit; Staubach‐Renz, Petra ...
Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft,
June 2023, 2023-Jun, 2023-06-00, 20230601, Letnik:
21, Številka:
6
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Summary
Sleep is a normal physiological process that accounts for approximately one third of a person's life. Disruption of the normal sleep cycle, which maintains physiological homeostasis, can lead ...to pathology. It is not known whether sleep disturbance causes skin disease or skin disease causes sleep impairment, but a bidirectional influence is suspected. We have compiled the data from published articles on “sleep disorders in dermatology” in PubMed Central from July 2010 to July 2022 (with the option “full text available”) and provide an overview of sleep disorders associated with dermatological conditions and certain drugs used in dermatology as well as sleep disturbances for which some drugs used can cause itch or dermatological issues. Atopic dermatitis, eczema and psoriasis have been shown to be exacerbated by sleep problems and vice versa. Sleep deprivation, night‐time pruritus and disrupted sleep cycles are often used to assess treatment response and quality of life in these conditions. Some medications used primarily for dermatological conditions have also been associated with alterations in the sleep‐wake cycle. Addressing patients sleep disorders should be an integral part of the management of dermatological conditions. More studies are needed to further investigate the influence of sleep and skin disorders.
To the Editor: Symptomatic dermographism (SDerm) is the most common form of physical urticaria with a prevalence of up to 5%.1 SDerm is characterized by itchy wheals that occur in response to ...friction, for example, after rubbing or scratching of the skin, and usually last for 1 to 2 hours.2 SDerm commonly lasts for years and significantly impairs quality of life (QOL).2 The underlying cause of SDerm is unknown, and the trigger is difficult, if not impossible, to avoid. ...symptomatic treatment with antihistamines is the first-choice treatment. ...omalizumab in doses of 150 and 300 mg resulted in a high rate of complete and partial responders in patients with SDerm and a pronounced overall reduction in disease activity and QOL impairment in these patients. There were no evident differences between omalizumab and placebo, other than their viscosity. Because of this, a separate and independent unblinded study team prepared and injected the study medication. Statistical analysis The UFO study is the first clinical trial of the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in SDerm. ...no pretrial sample size calculation was performed.
Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating mast cell–driven disease, often refractory to standard therapy (ie, antihistamines). Lirentelimab, an anti–sialic acid–binding immunoglobulin-like lectin 8 ...mAb, selectively inhibits mast cells and depletes eosinophils.
We sought to determine safety and efficacy of lirentelimab in patients with CU.
This phase 2a study enrolled patients with CU refractory to up to 4-fold H1-antihistamine doses. Patients received 6 monthly intravenous doses of lirentelimab (0.3, 1, and up to 3 mg/kg). Primary efficacy end point was change in Urticaria Control Test score at week 22. Urticaria Activity Score weekly average (UAS7) was assessed in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and Cholinergic UAS7 was used for patients with cholinergic urticaria (CholU).
A total of 45 patients were enrolled in 4 cohorts (n = 13 omalizumab-naive CSU, n = 11 omalizumab-refractory CSU, n = 11 CholU, n = 10 symptomatic dermographism). Urticaria Control Test scores increased with lirentelimab across cohorts, with mean changes at week 22 of 11.1 ± 4.1, 4.8 ± 7.0, 6.5 ± 6.2, and 3.4 ± 4.1 and complete response rates (Urticaria Control Test score ≥ 12) of 92%, 36%, 82%, and 40%, respectively. In omalizumab-naive and omalizumab-refractory patients with CSU, disease activity decreased at week 22 (mean UAS7 change, −73% and −47%, respectively), with UAS7 response rates (≥50% reduction) of 77% and 45%, respectively. In patients with symptomatic dermographism, 50% (5 of 10) and 40% (4 of 10) had complete itch and hive resolution by FricTest, respectively, and 100% (7 of 7) evaluable patients with CholU had negative responses to Pulse-Controlled Ergometry exercise test. Most common adverse events included infusion-related reactions (43%; all mild/moderate and transient), nasopharyngitis (21%), and headache (19%). No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred.
Lirentelimab demonstrated activity across 3 forms of antihistamine-refractory CU.
Ligelizumab for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Maurer, Marcus; Giménez-Arnau, Ana M; Sussman, Gordon ...
The New England journal of medicine,
10/2019, Letnik:
381, Številka:
14
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
In the majority of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria, most currently available therapies do not result in complete symptom control. Ligelizumab is a next-generation high-affinity humanized ...monoclonal anti-IgE antibody. Data are limited regarding the dose-response relationship of ligelizumab and the efficacy and safety of ligelizumab as compared with omalizumab and placebo in patients who have moderate-to-severe chronic spontaneous urticaria that is inadequately controlled with H
-antihistamines at approved or increased doses, alone or in combination with H
-antihistamines or leukotriene-receptor antagonists.
In a phase 2b dose-finding trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive ligelizumab at a dose of 24 mg, 72 mg, or 240 mg, omalizumab at a dose of 300 mg, or placebo, administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for a period of 20 weeks, or a single 120-mg dose of ligelizumab. Disease symptoms of hives, itch, and angioedema were monitored by means of weekly activity scores. The main objective was to determine a dose-response relationship for the complete control of hives (indicated by a weekly hives-severity score of 0, on a scale from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity); the primary end point of this response was assessed at week 12. Complete symptom control was indicated by a weekly urticaria activity score of 0 (on a scale from 0 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater severity). Safety was analyzed throughout the trial.
A total of 382 patients underwent randomization. At week 12, a total of 30%, 51%, and 42% of the patients treated with 24 mg, 72 mg, and 240 mg, respectively, of ligelizumab had complete control of hives, as compared with 26% of the patients in the omalizumab group and no patients in the placebo group. A dose-response relationship was established. At week 12, a total of 30%, 44%, and 40% of the patients treated with 24 mg, 72 mg, and 240 mg, respectively, of ligelizumab had complete control of symptoms, as compared with 26% of the patients in the omalizumab group and no patients in the placebo group. In this small and short trial, no safety concerns regarding ligelizumab or omalizumab emerged.
A higher percentage of patients had complete control of symptoms of chronic spontaneous urticaria with ligelizumab therapy of 72 mg or 240 mg than with omalizumab or placebo. (Funded by Novartis Pharma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477332.).
Background
Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (aiCSU) is an important subtype of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in which functional IgG autoantibodies to IgE or its high‐affinity receptor ...(FcεRI) induces mast cell degranulation and subsequent symptom development. However, it has not been tightly characterized. This study aimed to better define the clinical and immunological features and to explore potential biomarkers of aiCSU.
Methods
This was a multinational, multicenter study of 182 CSU patients. The clinical features studied included: urticaria activity and impact (UAS7 and quality of life); autologous serum skin test (ASST); IgG anti‐FcεRI and IgG anti‐IgE; IgG‐anti‐thyroperoxidase (IgG anti‐TPO); total serum IgE; and basophil reactivity (BASO) using the basophil activation test (BAT) and basophil histamine release assay (BHRA).
Results
Of the 182 patients, 107 (59%) were ASST+, 46 (25%) were BASO+, and 105 (58%) were IgG anti‐FcεRI+/IgE+. Fifteen patients (8%) fulfilled all three criteria of aiCSU. aiCSU patients appeared more severe (UAS7 21 vs 9 P < 0.016) but showed no other clinical or demographic differences from non‐aiCSU patients. aiCSU patients also had markedly lower total IgE levels (P < 0.0001) and higher IgG anti‐TPO levels (P < 0.001). Of biomarkers, positive BAT and BHRA tests were 69% and 88% predictive of aiCSU, respectively.
Conclusions
aiCSU is a relatively small but immunologically distinct subtype of CSU that cannot be identified by routine clinical parameters. Inclusion of BHRA or BAT in the diagnostic workup of CSU patients may aid identification of aiCSU patients, who may have a different prognosis and benefit from specific management.
Autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria (aiCSU) is defined by IgG anti‐IgE or FcεRI, a positive basophil activation test (BAT) and a positive autologous serum skin test (ASST). 14% of ASST+ patients have aiCSU with low IgE levels and elevated levels of anti‐thyroperoxidase. Positive BAT and basophil histamine release assays (BHRA) were 69% and 88% predictive of aiCSU and, therefore, are biomarkers.
Background Patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria/chronic spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) often continue to experience symptoms despite receiving standard-of-care therapy with H1 -antihistamines ...along with 1 or more add-on therapies. Objectives We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 24 weeks of treatment with omalizumab in patients with persistent CIU/CSU despite treatment with H1 -antihistamines at up to 4 times the approved dose plus H2 -antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both. Methods In this phase III study patients were randomized to receive 6 subcutaneous injections at 4-week intervals of either 300 mg of omalizumab or placebo, followed by a 16-week observation period. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the overall safety of omalizumab compared with placebo. Efficacy (itch severity, hive, and urticaria activity scores) was evaluated at weeks 12 and 24. Results The overall incidence and severity of adverse events and serious adverse events were similar between omalizumab and placebo recipients; the safety profile was consistent with omalizumab in patients with allergic asthma. At week 12, the mean change from baseline in weekly itch severity score was −8.6 (95% CI, −9.3 to −7.8) in the omalizumab group compared with −4.0 (95% CI, −5.3 to −2.7) in the placebo group ( P < .001). Significant improvements were seen for additional efficacy end points at week 12; these benefits were sustained to week 24. Conclusion Omalizumab was well tolerated and reduced the signs and symptoms of CIU/CSU in patients who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1 -antihistamines (up to 4 times the approved dose) plus H2 -antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists, or both.
PDF
