Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections Stevens, Dennis L; Bryant, Amy E
The New England journal of medicine,
2017-Dec-07, Letnik:
377, Številka:
23
Journal Article
A panel of national experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2005 guidelines for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). The panel's ...recommendations were developed to be concordant with the recently published IDSA guidelines for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The focus of this guideline is the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of diverse SSTIs ranging from minor superficial infections to life-threatening infections such as necrotizing fasciitis. In addition, because of an increasing number of immunocompromised hosts worldwide, the guideline addresses the wide array of SSTIs that occur in this population. These guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical skills in promptly diagnosing SSTIs, identifying the pathogen, and administering effective treatments in a timely fashion.
Abstract
A panel of national experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2005 guidelines for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). The ...panel's recommendations were developed to be concordant with the recently published IDSA guidelines for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The focus of this guideline is the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of diverse SSTIs ranging from minor superficial infections to life-threatening infections such as necrotizing fasciitis. In addition, because of an increasing number of immunocompromised hosts worldwide, the guideline addresses the wide array of SSTIs that occur in this population. These guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical skills in promptly diagnosing SSTIs, identifying the pathogen, and administering effective treatments in a timely fashion.
A panel of national experts was convened by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) to update the 2005 guidelines for the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). The panel's ...recommendations were developed to be concordant with the recently published IDSA guidelines for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. The focus of this guideline is the diagnosis and appropriate treatment of diverse SSTIs ranging from minor superficial infections to life-threatening infections such as necrotizing fasciitis. In addition, because of an increasing number of immunocompromised hosts worldwide, the guideline addresses the wide array of SSTIs that occur in this population. These guidelines emphasize the importance of clinical skills in promptly diagnosing SSTIs, identifying the pathogen, and administering effective treatments in a timely fashion.
Soft-tissue infections are common, generally of mild to modest severity, and are easily treated with a variety of agents. An etiologic diagnosis of simple cellulitis is frequently difficult and ...generally unnecessary for patients with mild signs and symptoms of illness. Here, Stevens et al present details of a study on practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections.
Vancomycin was introduced in the United States in 1956 as a possible treatment for infections due to penicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but it was not used widely because of toxicity and the ...nearly simultaneous development of semisynthetic antibiotics and cephalosporins. Thus, its main indication was the treatment of serious gram-positive infections in penicillin-allergic patients. For susceptible strains of S. aureus, vancomycin was more rapidly bactericidal than penicillin, nafcillin, or cefazolin, and, in a rabbit model of S. aureus endocarditis, sterilization of vegetations was more rapid with vancomycin. In clinical practice, however, nafcillin remained the treatment of choice for staphylococcal bacteremia, largely because it had failure rates of only 4%. With the appearance of methicillin-resistant S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin became the drug of choice for these infections. Recently, the efficacy of vancomycin has been questioned because of vancomycin's increasing minimum inhibitory concentrations among staphylococci, poor tissue penetration, and apparently slower bacterial killing than previously was recognized.
Abstract
Background
Apart from their antimicrobial activities, some antibiotics have immunomodulatory effects on host cells, particularly monocytes. Because hyperactivation of the pro-inflammatory ...cytokine response contributes to acute lung injury in patients with bacterial pneumonia and other lung diseases, antimicrobial agents with immunomodulatory activity can reduce cytokine-mediated tissue injury and improve outcomes.
Objectives
Omadacycline has been recently FDA-approved for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. The present study investigated omadacycline’s ability to modulate LPS-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β), acute-phase reactants (IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10) by human monocytes in vitro.
Methods
Isolated human monocytes from healthy consenting adults were cultured in RPMI with 1% pooled human serum. Cells were pre-exposed to omadacycline (0.5–64 μg/mL), minocycline (25, 50 or 25 μg/mL) or azithromycin (20, 40 or 80 μg/mL) for 2 h, followed by stimulation with Escherichia coli LPS for 24 h. Cytokines elaborated in the culture supernatant were quantitated by multiplex immunoassay.
Results
Omadacycline dose-dependently suppressed LPS-induced production of all cytokines tested. Only high-dose minocycline (100 μg/mL) modestly suppressed TNF-α whereas minocycline significantly increased LPS-induced IL-1β production. Lower concentrations of minocycline were also stimulatory for IFN-γ, IL-6 and IL-4. Except for suppression of IL-6, azithromycin was largely without effect.
Conclusions
Omadacycline has unique and broad immunomodulatory properties. Such activity supports its use in settings where hyperactivation of the immune response contributes to tissue injury and poor outcomes, especially at sites where pro-inflammatory M-type 1 macrophages dominate the cellular immune response.
Extracellular protein toxins contribute to the pathogenesis of a wide variety of Staphylococcus aureus infections. The present study investigated the effects that cell-wall active antibiotics and ...protein-synthesis inhibitors have on transcription and translation of genes for Panton-Valentine leukocidin, alpha-hemolysin, and toxic-shock syndrome toxin 1, in both methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant S. aureus Subinhibitory concentrations of nafcillin induced and prolonged mRNA for Panton-Valentine leukocidin, alpha-toxin, and toxic-shock syndrome toxin 1 and increased toxin production. In contrast, clindamycin and linezolid markedly suppressed translation, but not transcription, of toxin genes. These results suggest (1) that protein-synthesis inhibition is an important consideration in the selection of antimicrobial agents to treat serious infections caused by toxin-producing gram-positive pathogens and (2) that, by inducing and enhancing toxin production, inadvertent use of beta-lactam antibiotics to treat methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections may contribute to worse outcomes
PDF
