The fragility index represents the minimum number of patients required to convert an outcome from statistically significant to insignificant. This report assesses the fragility index of head and neck ...cancer randomised, controlled trials.
Studies were extracted from PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases.
Overall, 123 randomised, controlled trials were included. The sample size and fragility index medians (interquartile ranges) were 103 (56-213) and 2 (0-5), respectively. The fragility index exceeded the number of patients lost to follow up in 42.3 per cent (
= 52) of studies. A higher fragility index correlated with higher sample size (r = 0.514,
< 0.001), number of events (r = 0.449,
< 0.001) and statistical significance via
-value (r = -0.367,
< 0.001).
Head and neck cancer randomised, controlled trials demonstrated low fragility index values, in which statistically significant results could be nullified by altering the outcomes of just two patients, on average. Future head and neck oncology randomised, controlled trials should report the fragility index in order to provide insight into statistical robustness.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has gained significant recent global interest in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer. It is a relatively new, minimally invasive, thermal ablation ...technique that is an alternative to surgery. Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), consensus statements, and recommendations currently exist for the use of RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancers. These documents have considerable variability amongst them, and to date, their quality and methodologic rigor have not been appraised.
To identify and perform a quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for RFA in the treatment of benign thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.
A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases from inception to November 1, 2021. Four reviewers independently evaluated each guideline using the AGREE II instrument. Scaled domain scores were generated and the threshold used for satisfactory quality was >60%. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to determine level of agreement between reviewers.
Seven guidelines were selected for final evaluation based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Two guidelines were classified “high” quality, one “average” quality, and the rest “low” quality. The “Clarity and Presentation” (65.68 ± 26.1) and “Editorial Independence” (61.32 ± 25.8) domains received the highest mean scores, while the “Applicability” (32.14 ± 22.8) and “Rigor of Development” (45.02 ± 29.8) domains received the lowest mean scores. ICC statistical analysis showed high magnitude of agreement between reviewers with a range of (0.722–0.944).
Reflecting upon our quality appraisal, it is evident that the quality and methodologic rigor of RFA guidelines can be improved upon in the future. Our findings also elucidate the existing variability/discrepancies amongst guidelines in the indications and use of RFA.
Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), consensus statements, and recommendations currently exist for the diagnosis and management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). These documents have ...considerable variability amongst them, and to date, their quality and methodologic rigor have not been appraised.
We aim to identify and perform a quality appraisal of CPGs for the diagnosis and management of BTcP using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) tool.
A comprehensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases up until January 1, 2021. Four reviewers independently evaluated each guideline using the AGREE II instrument. Scaled domain scores were generated and the threshold used for satisfactory quality was >60%. Additionally, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine level of agreement between reviewers.
Eleven guidelines were selected for final evaluation based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Only one guideline was classified of “average” quality while the rest were classified as “low” quality. The “Editorial Independence” (70.46 ± 35.7) and “Scope and Purpose” (64.78 ± 12.5) domains received the highest mean scores, while the “Applicability” (32.58 ± 13.5) and “Rigor of Development” (35.04 ± 9.0) domains received the lowest mean scores. ICC statistical analysis showed high magnitude of agreement between reviewers with a range of (0.790-0.988).
Reflecting upon our quality appraisal, it is evident that the quality and methodologic rigor of BTcP guidelines can be improved upon in the future. Our findings also elucidate the existing variability/discrepancies among guidelines in diagnostic criteria and management of BTcP.
Background
Historically, graduating head and neck (HN) fellows outpace available academic HN positions, resulting in a highly competitive job market. We identified factors that associate with ...full‐time academic HN positions post‐HN fellowship.
Methods
Graduates of American Head and Neck Society (AHNS)‐accredited fellowships from 2005 to 2017 (n = 356) were extracted from the AHNS website.
Results
From 2015 to 2017, the supply–demand mismatch for academic HN jobs improved. Of the 57.3% (n = 204) of graduating HN fellows who entered academia, 64% (n = 130) trained at just 10 fellowship institutions, 47% (n = 94) attended OHNS residency at an NIH top 40 funded institution, and 54% (n = 111) attended OHNS residency at an AHNS‐accredited institution offering HN fellowship. After multivariate regression, number of manuscripts (OR = 1.14; p = 0.01) was significantly associated with initial academic job post‐fellowship.
Conclusion
The recent improvement in supply–demand mismatch for academic jobs is promising for future HN fellows interested in academia.
Purpose
Several clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been produced to optimize the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion. However, to date there have been no ...critical evaluations of their methodological rigor or quality. Herein, we address this need via the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument.
Methods
A literature search of Embase, MEDLINE via PubMed, and Scopus was performed up until February 25, 2021. Identified CPGs were then assessed by four independent reviewers trained in AGREE II. A scaled domain score of >60% was indicated as satisfactory quality. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess inter-reviewer agreement.
Results
11 guidelines were assessed with only one being classified as high quality and others being either average (two) or low quality (eight). Domain 4 (clarity of presentation) achieved the highest mean score (66.41 ± 13.33%), while domain 5 (applicability) achieved the lowest score (10.80 ± 10.37%). ICC analysis revealed generally strong agreement between reviewers with a range of 0.60–0.98.
Conclusion
Quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument suggests that the methodologic rigor and quality of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pediatric foreign body aspiration and ingestion need significant improvement.
Purpose
Multiple groups have created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). This report provides a rigorous quality assessment using the ...Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument (AGREE II) to identify high-performing guidelines and areas for improvement.
Methods
A systematic review was conducted to isolate CPGs addressing the management of PHPT. Guideline data was extracted and quality ratings were assigned by four independent reviewers. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to ensure interrater reliability.
Results
Twelve guidelines were assessed. The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) guideline had the highest mean scaled score across all domains (73.6 ± 31.4%). No other published guideline achieved a “high” quality designation. The highest scoring domain was “clarity of presentation” (mean 60.5 ± 26.5%). The lowest scoring domain was “applicability” (mean 19.8 ± 18.2%). Scoring reliability was excellent, with ICC ≥ 0.89 for all AGREE II 6 domains.
Conclusion
Although several working groups have developed guidelines to address PHPT management, only those published by the AAES meet all methodologic quality criteria necessary to ensure incorporation of recommendations into clinical practice. Future guidelines would benefit from the development of tools, resources, monitoring criteria that enhance applicability.
Objective
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient‐centered, evidence‐based pathways designed to reduce complications, promote recovery, and improve outcomes following surgery. ...These protocols have been successfully applied for the management of head and neck cancer, but relatively few studies have investigated the applicability of these pathways for other outpatient procedures in otolaryngology. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of available evidence reporting the utility of ERAS protocols for the management of patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngology operations.
Methods
A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and gray literature. We identified studies that evaluated ERAS protocols among patients undergoing otologic, laryngeal, nasal/sinus, pediatric, and general otolaryngology operations. We assessed the outcomes and ERAS components across protocols as well as the study design and limitations.
Results
A total of eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Types of procedures evaluated with ERAS protocols included tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and septoplasty. A reduction in postoperative length of stay and hospital costs was reported in two and three studies, respectively. Comparative studies between ERAS and control groups showed persistent improvement in pre‐ and postoperative anxiety and pain levels, without an increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates.
Conclusions
A limited number of studies discuss implementation of ERAS protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology. These clinical pathways appear promising for these procedures as they may reduce length of stay, decrease costs, and improve pain and anxiety postoperatively.
Highlights
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in outpatient otolaryngology operations are effective in significantly decreasing hospital length of stay, hospital costs, and postoperative pain/anxiety.
The most common components among ERAS protocols were postoperative analgesia regimen, postoperative nutrition, fluid management, and preoperative education/counseling.
Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient otolaryngology operations.
This report is a case of bilateral vocal cord granulomas (VCG) in a 9-year-old child presenting as an airway foreign body and stridor following prolonged intubation due to COVID-19 pneumonia ...complicated by multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).
This case reports a 9-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with acute stridor concerning for airway obstruction. X-ray findings suggested an airway foreign body; however, on rigid bronchoscopy, ball-valving bilateral VCG obstructing 90% of the glottic airway were identified. After excision of the VCGs, the patient's symptoms resolved with no postoperative complications.
With suspected foreign body aspiration in a pediatric patient with a history of prolonged intubation, it is important to consider a broad differential diagnosis. VCGs are rare complications of prolonged intubation that could be in children with prior history of intubation following COVID-19 pneumonia.
Rare presentation of pediatric angiomatosis of the paranasal sinus and skull base presenting mimicking juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA). This is a 16-year-old male who presented to the ...emergency room with acutely worsening headaches, decreased visual acuity, subjective diplopia on lateral gaze, and a skull base mass centered in the sphenoid cavity. Endoscopic biopsy at an outside facility was aborted due to profuse bleeding. Upon transfer to a tertiary care center, contrast MR demonstrated a heterogeneously and avidly enhancing vascular mass centered around the sphenoid and skull base originating from the internal maxillary artery with significant bilateral extension into the adjacent paranasal sinuses, sella, and cavernous sinus. History of presentation and imaging was suggestive of JNA. Patient underwent preoperative embolization followed by endoscopic endonasal transphenoidal resection with a skull base trained otolaryngologist and neurosurgeon. Final pathology confirmed angiomatosis. This is only the second reported case of paranasal sinus angiomatosis in the literature. Angiomatosis has a high rate of recurrence and failure of timely diagnosis can lead to requirement of repeated surgical intervention. Re-operations are associated with increased costs, patient dissatisfaction, and poorer surgical/clinical outcomes. Because angiomatosis can mimic JNA, hemangiomas, or other vascular tumors, it is essential to maintain a broad differential diagnosis that includes angiomatosis when evaluating sinonasal tumors.
PDF
