A meeting entitled ‘Current Perspective on the Use of Statins in the Treatment of Dyslipidemic Patients’ was held in Stresa, Italy, on 27–28th June 2019. The presentations covered the 2019 European ...Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines on dyslipidaemia, with discussion about the importance of controlling low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and the pharmacological opportunities to reach the novel lipid goals. The roles of statins to manage dyslipidaemia in patients with different cardiovascular risks were also discussed. In particular, the efficacy and safety of pitavastatin for the treatment of dyslipidaemia were reviewed, highlighting its further advantages beyond LDL-C reduction. Therefore, the impact of statins on the glycaemic profile was discussed in view of the null/lower effect of pitavastatin as compared with other statins, as well as the interaction profile with other drugs commonly used. This meeting report summarizes the main messages of the discussion with a special focus on pitavastatin, whose main features in different settings are described.
Lipid risk factors for cardiovascular disease depend in part on lifestyle, but optimum control of lipids often demands additional measures. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) doubtless contributes ...causally to atherosclerosis. Recent human genetic findings have substantiated a number of novel targets for lipid-lowering therapy including apolipoprotein C-III, angiopoietin-like protein 3 and 4, apolipoprotein V, and ATP citrate lyase. These discoveries coupled with advances in biotechnology development afford new avenues for management of LDL and other aspects of lipid risk. Beyond LDL, new treatments targeting triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) have become available and have entered clinical development. Biological and RNA-directed agents have joined traditional small-molecule approaches, which themselves have undergone considerable refinement. Innovative targeting strategies have increased efficacy of some of these novel interventions and markedly improved their tolerability. Gene-editing approaches have appeared on the horizon of lipid management. This article reviews this progress offering insight into novel biological and therapeutic discoveries, and places them into a practical patient care perspective.
Pulmonary hypertension is a group of diseases, including pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with congenital heart disease (APAH-CHD), characterized by progressive deterioration in pulmonary ...hemodynamics associated with substantial morbidity and mortality risk. THALES is a national multicenter, prospective observational registry, providing data on patients with APAH-CHD. The study comprised APAH-CHD patients (>3 months of age) with confirmed diagnosis of right heart catheterization or echocardiographic findings. Initial and follow-up data were collected via regular hospital visits. Descriptive statistics are used for definitive purposes. Overall, 1034 patients aged 3 months–79 years (median 11.2 Q1–Q3: 2.2–24.3 years) with APAH-CHD were enrolled at 61 centers, 50.3% being retrospectively enrolled. Most had either Eisenmenger's syndrome (49.2%) or systemic-to-pulmonary shunts (42.7%). Patients were mostly in functional class I–II at the time of diagnosis (46.6%). Mean 6-min walk distance (6MWD) was 369 ± 120 m. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 54.7 ± 22.2 mmHg for the whole group, and was highest in patients with Eisenmenger's syndrome. Targeted therapies were noted in 398 (38.5%) patients (monotherapy in 80.4%). Follow-up data were available in 506 patients. Survival at 140 months was 79% and was associated with baseline 6MWD >440 m (p = 0.009), brain natriuretic peptide level < 300 ng/L (p < 0.001). Follow-up 6MWD >165 m (p < 0.0001), brain natriuretic peptide level <300 ng/L (p = 0.031), and targeted therapies (p = 0.004) were also predictive of survival. THALES is the largest registry dedicated to APAH-CHD to date and provides important contributions on demographics, clinical characteristics, and gaps in disease management.
This European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Task Force provides practical guidance for combination therapy for elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and/or triglycerides (TG) in ...high-risk and very-high-risk patients.
Evidence-based review.
Statin-ezetimibe combination treatment is the first choice for managing elevated LDL-C and should be given upfront in very-high-risk patients with high LDL-C unlikely to reach goal with a statin, and in primary prevention familial hypercholesterolaemia patients. A proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor may be added if LDL-C levels remain high. In high and very-high-risk patients with mild to moderately elevated TG levels (>2.3 and < 5.6 mmol/L >200 and < 500 mg/dL) on a statin, treatment with either a fibrate or high-dose omega-3 fatty acids (icosapent ethyl) may be considered, weighing the benefit versus risks. Combination with fenofibrate may be considered for both macro- and microvascular benefits in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
This guidance aims to improve real-world use of guideline-recommended combination lipid modifying treatment.
•This EAS Task Force gives practical guidance for combination lipid lowering therapy in high- and very-high-risk patients.•In patients unlikely to reach the LDL-C goal with a statin alone combination with ezetimibe is suggested as first choice.•A PCSK9 inhibitor may be added if LDL-C levels remain high.•For type 2 diabetes with high triglycerides on statin, fenofibrate may be considered for macro- and microvascular benefits.••High-dose icosapent ethyl may be also considered for high triglycerides on statin treatment, weighing benefit vs. risk.
Abstract Objective This EAS Consensus Panel critically appraised evidence relevant to the benefit to risk relationship of functional foods with added plant sterols and/or plant stanols, as components ...of a healthy lifestyle, to reduce plasma low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, and thereby lower cardiovascular risk. Methods and results Plant sterols/stanols (when taken at 2 g/day) cause significant inhibition of cholesterol absorption and lower LDL-C levels by between 8 and 10%. The relative proportions of cholesterol versus sterol/stanol levels are similar in both plasma and tissue, with levels of sterols/stanols being 500-/10,000-fold lower than those of cholesterol, suggesting they are handled similarly to cholesterol in most cells. Despite possible atherogenicity of marked elevations in circulating levels of plant sterols/stanols, protective effects have been observed in some animal models of atherosclerosis. Higher plasma levels of plant sterols/stanols associated with intakes of 2 g/day in man have not been linked to adverse effects on health in long-term human studies. Importantly, at this dose, plant sterol/stanol-mediated LDL-C lowering is additive to that of statins in dyslipidaemic subjects, equivalent to doubling the dose of statin. The reported 6–9% lowering of plasma triglyceride by 2 g/day in hypertriglyceridaemic patients warrants further evaluation. Conclusion Based on LDL-C lowering and the absence of adverse signals, this EAS Consensus Panel concludes that functional foods with plant sterols/stanols may be considered 1) in individuals with high cholesterol levels at intermediate or low global cardiovascular risk who do not qualify for pharmacotherapy, 2) as an adjunct to pharmacologic therapy in high and very high risk patients who fail to achieve LDL-C targets on statins or are statin- intolerant, 3) and in adults and children (>6 years) with familial hypercholesterolaemia, in line with current guidance. However, it must be acknowledged that there are no randomised, controlled clinical trial data with hard end-points to establish clinical benefit from the use of plant sterols or plant stanols.
To appraise the clinical and genetic evidence that low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
We assessed whether the association between LDL and ASCVD ...fulfils the criteria for causality by evaluating the totality of evidence from genetic studies, prospective epidemiologic cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials of LDL-lowering therapies. In clinical studies, plasma LDL burden is usually estimated by determination of plasma LDL cholesterol level (LDL-C). Rare genetic mutations that cause reduced LDL receptor function lead to markedly higher LDL-C and a dose-dependent increase in the risk of ASCVD, whereas rare variants leading to lower LDL-C are associated with a correspondingly lower risk of ASCVD. Separate meta-analyses of over 200 prospective cohort studies, Mendelian randomization studies, and randomized trials including more than 2 million participants with over 20 million person-years of follow-up and over 150 000 cardiovascular events demonstrate a remarkably consistent dose-dependent log-linear association between the absolute magnitude of exposure of the vasculature to LDL-C and the risk of ASCVD; and this effect appears to increase with increasing duration of exposure to LDL-C. Both the naturally randomized genetic studies and the randomized intervention trials consistently demonstrate that any mechanism of lowering plasma LDL particle concentration should reduce the risk of ASCVD events proportional to the absolute reduction in LDL-C and the cumulative duration of exposure to lower LDL-C, provided that the achieved reduction in LDL-C is concordant with the reduction in LDL particle number and that there are no competing deleterious off-target effects.
Consistent evidence from numerous and multiple different types of clinical and genetic studies unequivocally establishes that LDL causes ASCVD.
PDF
