Background: Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is recurrent angina pectoris-like pain without evidence of coronary heart disease in conventional diagnostic evaluation. The prevalence of NCCP is up to 70% ...and may be detected (in this order) at all levels of the medical health care system (general practitioner, emergency department, chest pain unit, coronary care). Reduction of quality of life due to NCCP is comparable, and partially even higher, to that caused by cardiac chest pain. Reasons for psychological strain are symptom recurrence in approximately 50%, nonspecific diagnosis with resulting uncertainty, and insufficient integration of other medical disciplines in the diagnostic workup. Methods and Results: The management of patients with chest pain has to be multidisciplinary because non-cardiac causes may be frequently encountered. Especially gastroenterological expertise is required since the cause of chest pain is gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in 50-60%, hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders with nutcracker/jackhammer esophagus or diffuse esophageal spasm or achalasia in 15-18%, and other esophageal alterations (e.g., infectious esophageal inflammation, drug-induced ulcers, rings, webs, eosinophilic esophagitis) in 32-35%. Conclusion: This review highlights the importance of regular interdisciplinary ward rounds and management of chest pain units.
Abstract
So, is there enough evidence to incorporate CC in clinical practice? If we interpret the literature and the meta-analysis by Nutalapati et al., the answer for the clinically-focused ...endoscopist, with regard to adenoma detection rate (ADR), at present, may be “no”. Significant differences do not necessarily imply clinical benefits and translation into clinical practice. The answer for the improvement of cecal intubation frequency and intubation time by the cap depends on the focus of training commitment, because these effects of the cap may be beneficial, especially for unexperienced endoscopists. It is obvious that further studies are needed. In this line, it is interesting to know, that in a recent meta-analysis of prospective studies, the length of the transparent cap had opposite effects on investigation time and polyp detection rate. Whereas, the anal to cecal time was significantly shortened by a cap length of > 7 mm and a polyp detection rate was significantly improved by a cap length of < 4 mm.
Functional dyspepsia (FD) is one of the more common functional disorders, with a prevalence of 10-20%. It affectsthe gastrointestinal tract.
This article is based on publications retrieved by a ...selective search of PubMed, with special attention to controlled trials, guidelines, and reviews.
Typical dyspeptic symptoms in functional dyspepsia include epigastric pain, sensations of pressure and fullness, nausea, and early subjective satiety. The etiology of the disorder is heterogeneous and multifactorial. Contributory causes include motility disturbances, visceral hypersensitivity, elevated mucosal permeability, and disturbances of the autonomic and enteric nervous system. There is as yet no causally directed treatment for functional dyspepsia. Its treatment should begin with intensive patient education regarding the benign nature of the disorder and with the establishment of a therapeutic pact for long-term care. Given the absence of a causally directed treatment, drugs to treat functional dyspepsia should be given for no more than 8-12 weeks. Proton-pump inhibitors, phytotherapeutic drugs, and Helicobacter pylori eradication are evidence-based interventions. For intractable cases, tricyclic antidepressants and psychotherapy are further effective treatment options.
The impaired quality of life of patients with functional dyspepsia implies the need for definitive establishment of the diagnosis, followed by symptom-oriented treatment for the duration of the symptomatic interval.
The causes of gastrointestinal complaints in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) remain poorly understood. Altered nerve function has emerged as an important pathogenic factor as IBS mucosal biopsy ...supernatants consistently activate enteric and sensory neurons. We investigated the neurally active molecular components of such supernatants from patients with IBS and quiescent ulcerative colitis (UC).
Effects of supernatants from 7 healthy controls (HC), 20 IBS and 12 UC patients on human and guinea pig submucous neurons were studied with neuroimaging techniques. We identify differentially expressed proteins with proteome analysis.
Nerve activation by IBS supernatants was prevented by the protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1) antagonist SCHE79797. UC supernatants also activated enteric neurons through protease dependent mechanisms but without PAR1 involvement. Proteome analysis of the supernatants identified 204 proteins, among them 17 proteases as differentially expressed between IBS, UC and HC. Of those the four proteases elastase 3a, chymotrypsin C, proteasome subunit type beta-2 and an unspecified isoform of complement C3 were significantly more abundant in IBS compared to HC and UC supernatants. Of eight proteases, which were upregulated in IBS, the combination of elastase 3a, cathepsin L and proteasome alpha subunit-4 showed the highest prediction accuracy of 98% to discriminate between IBS and HC groups. Elastase synergistically potentiated the effects of histamine and serotonin-the two other main neuroactive substances in the IBS supernatants. A serine protease inhibitor isolated from the probiotic Bifidobacterium longum NCC2705 (SERPINBL), known to inhibit elastase-like proteases, prevented nerve activation by IBS supernatants.
Proteases in IBS and UC supernatants were responsible for nerve activation. Our data demonstrate that proteases, particularly those signalling through neuronal PAR1, are biomarker candidates for IBS, and protease profiling may be used to characterise IBS.
Noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) is recurrent angina pectoris-like pain without evidence of coronary heart disease in conventional diagnostic evaluation. In gastroenterology, managing of patients with ...NCCP is ambiguous to detect gastroesophageal reflux and hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders. Recently, peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was established as treatment option in achalasia. However, limited data exist on the effectivity of POEM in NCCP with hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders.
In this prospective study (POEM-HYPE), we evaluated 14 patients with NCCP and hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders (type III achalasia, n = 7; hypercontractile esophagus, n = 6; distal esophageal spasm, n = 1). All patients underwent standardized diagnostic work-up including esophagogastroduodenoscopy with esophageal biopsies, high-resolution esophageal manometry, and combined intraluminal impedance and pH testing before and 3 weeks after POEM. A standardized symptom questionnaire was disposed before POEM, 3 weeks after, and every 6 months after the POEM.
After POEM, 12 patients showed significant symptom relief (pre-Eckardt score: 7.78 ± 1.47, 3 weeks post: 1.64 ± 1.44, 6 months: 2.0 ± 1.84 and 1.86 ± 1.89 after 15.0 ± 10.0 months post-intervention). High-resolution manometry showed significant reduction in integrated relaxation pressure (pre-POEM: 24.74 ± 18.9 mm Hg, post-POEM: 13.8 ± 16.5 mm Hg) and distal contractile integral (pre-POEM: 2880 ± 3700 mmHg*s*cm, post-POEM: 1109 ± 1042 mmHg*s*cm). One lesion of the submucosal tunnel occurred as a moderate adverse event and was handled endoscopically. The long-term clinical success rate was 85.7 %. No severe gastroesophageal reflux occurred after interventions. Two patients required secondary therapy with injection of botulinum toxin in the tubular esophagus and balloon dilation.
The results suggest that POEM is an effective and safe therapeutic option for patients with NCCP and hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders.
Abstract
Background and study aims
Gastrointestinal symptoms assumed to be caused by food intolerance are reported frequently in the general population. There is a significant difference between ...self-reported and objective proven food intolerance, as shown by placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trials. This discrepancy may be overcome by endoscopic confocal laser endomicroscopy (eCLE).
Patients and methods
In an observational study we evaluated 34 patients with functional abdominal pain and adverse reaction to food by eCLE and local duodenal food challenge for the first time. Spontaneous and food-induced transfer of fluorescein into the duodenal lumen was detected 10 minutes after intravenously application of fluorescein and 10 minutes after duodenal food challenge (DFC).
Results
Of the patients, 67.6 % responded with a fluorescein leakage into the duodenal lumen. Frequency rank order of food antigens that induced a response were soy (50 %), wheat (46.1 %), milk (20 %), egg (12 %), and yeast (11.5 %), respectively. Of the patients, 23.5 % showed spontaneous leakage of fluorescein, suggesting leaky gut syndrome. Histology of duodenal biopsies and mast cell function were normal. Overall, 69.5 % of patients improved with food exclusion therapy and 13 % were symptom-free according to eCLE.
Conclusions
The results of our study indicate that eCLE is a clinically useful tool to evaluate patients with functional abdominal pain and adverse reaction to food and to create individualized dietary therapy with clinical benefit for patients.
Objective Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has shown efficacy and safety in the colorectum. The aim of this analysis was to investigate whether EFTR is cost-effective in comparison with ...surgical and endoscopic treatment alternatives. Design Real data from the study cohort of the prospective, single-arm WALL RESECT study were used. A simulated comparison arm was created based on a survey that included suggested treatment alternatives to EFTR of the respective lesions. Treatment costs and reimbursement were calculated in euro according to the coding rules of 2017 and 2019 (EFTR). R0 resection rate was used as a measure of effectiveness. To assess cost-effectiveness, the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were determined. Calculations were made both from the perspective of the care provider as well as of the payer. Results The cost per case was €2852.20 for the EFTR group, €1712 for the standard endoscopic resection (SER) group, €8895 for the surgical resection group and €5828 for the pooled alternative treatment to EFTR. From the perspective of the care provider, the ACER (mean cost per R0 resection) was €3708.98 for EFTR, €3115.10 for SER, €8924.05 for surgical treatment and €7169.30 for all pooled and weighted alternatives to EFTR. The ICER (additional cost per R0 resection compared with EFTR) was €5196.47 for SER, €26 533.13 for surgical resection and €67 768.62 for the pooled rate of alternatives. Results from the perspective of the payer were similar. Conclusion EFTR is cost-effective in comparison with surgical and endoscopic treatment alternatives in the colorectum.
The enteric nervous system (ENS) resides within the gut wall and autonomously controls gut functions through coordinated activation of sensory, inter and motor neurons. Its activity is modulated by ...the enteric immune and endocrine system as well as by afferent and efferent nerves of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system. The ENS is often referred to as the second brain and hence is able to perform sophisticated tasks. We review the evidence that the “smartness” of the ENS may even extend to its ability to learn and to memorize. Examples for habituation, sensitization, conditioned behaviour and long‐term facilitation are evidence for various forms of implicit learning. Moreover, we discuss how this may change not only basic Neurogastroenterology but also our understanding of development of gut diseases and chronic disorders in gut functions. At the same time, we identify open questions and future challenges to confirm learning, memory and memory deficits in the gut. Despite some remaining experimental challenges, we are convinced that the gut is able to learn and are tempted to answer the question with: Yes, the gut is smart.
PDF
