The current European LeukemiaNet (ELN) recommendations for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) propose a new risk reporting system, integrating molecular and cytogenetic factors and subdividing the large ...heterogenous group of intermediate-risk patients into intermediate-I (IR-I) and intermediate-II (IR-II). We assessed the prognostic value of the new risk classification in a large cohort of patients.
Complete data for classification were available for 1,557 of 1,862 patients treated in the AML96 trial. Patients were assigned to the proposed genetic groups from the ELN recommendations, and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test for significance testing.
The median age of all patients was 67 years. With a median follow-up of 8.3 years, significant differences between all risk categories were observed in patients age ≤ 60 years regarding the time to relapse, relapse-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Patients in the IR-II group had a better prognosis than patients in the IR-I group. The median OS times in young patients with favorable risk (FR), IR-I, IR-II, and adverse risk (AR) were 5.3, 1.1, 1.6, and 0.5 years, respectively. Separate analyses in the age group older than 60 years revealed significant differences between FR, AR, and IR as a whole, but not between IR-I and IR-II.
In younger patients with AML, the ELN classification seems to be the best available framework for prognostic estimations to date. Caution is advised concerning its use for prospective treatment allocation before it has been prospectively validated. In elderly patients, alternative prognostic factors are desirable for further risk stratification of IR.
A nationwide, multi-institutional survey was performed in 2011 and 2015 to analyze routine practice for myeloma patients outside clinical trials in Germany. We contacted university hospitals, ...community hospitals, and office-based hematologists in order to enter clinical data from newly diagnosed and relapsed patients into an online platform. Complete datasets were available for 478 (2011) and 515 (2015) patients. While median age at diagnosis increased from 70 to 72 years, patients had fewer concomitant diseases (2011 61%; 2015 51%) and presented with equal performance status (ECOG 0–1, 2011 66%; 2015 68%). Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 53% (2011) and 59% (2015). Patients ≥70 years, or patients with comorbidities who were no candidates for autologous transplantation (ASCT), were less frequently tested for cytogenetic abnormalities (
p
= 0.001, respectively). There were more candidates for ASCT ≥65 years in 2015 (57%) than in 2011 (27%). Bortezomib was used in 92% of transplant-eligible and 66% of transplant-ineligible patients as frontline therapy in 2015. Application of bortezomib and lenalidomide for the first relapse changed from 2011 (bortezomib 45%; lenalidomide 27%) to 2015 (bortezomib 28%; lenalidomide 54%). For the second relapse, application of lenalidomide decreased from 2011 (36%) to 2015 (23%). Pomalidomide entered treatment for the second relapse in 2015 (11% of patients). Taken together, we demonstrate that results from clinical trials are implemented into general practice in Germany.
We conducted a single-arm phase-II trial (AMLSG 16-10) to evaluate midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT) and a one-year midostaurin ...maintenance therapy in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and FLT3 internal tandem duplication (ITD). Patients 18-70 years of age with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD-positive AML were eligible. Primary and key secondary endpoints were event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results were compared to a historical cohort of 415 patients treated on 5 prior AMLSG trials; statistical analysis was performed using a double-robust adjustment with propensity score weighting and covariate adjustment. Results were also compared to patients (18-59yrs) treated on the placebo arm of the CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial. The trial accrued 440 patients (18-60yrs, n=312; 61-70yrs, n=128). In multivariate analysis, EFS was significantly in favor of patients treated within the AMLSG 16-10 trial compared to the AMLSG control (HR 0.55; P<0.001); both in younger (HR 0.59; P<0.001) and older patients (HR 0.42; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis also showed a significant beneficial effect on OS compared to the AMLSG control (HR 0.57; P<0.001) as well as to the CALGB 10603/RATIFY trial (HR 0.71; p=0.005). The treatment effect of midostaurin remained significant in sensitivity analysis including allogeneic HCT as a time-dependent covariate. Addition of midostaurin to chemotherapy was safe in younger and older patients. In comparison to historical controls, the addition of midostaurin to intensive therapy led to a significant improvement in outcome in younger and older patients with AML and FLT3-ITD.
The aim of this trial was to investigate the addition of the anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) in induction and consolidation therapy as ...well as to lenalidomide maintenance treatment in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
GMMG-HD6 was a phase 3, randomised trial conducted at 43 main trial sites and 26 associated trial sites throughout Germany. Adult patients (aged 18–70 years) with previously untreated, symptomatic multiple myeloma, and a WHO performance status of 0–3, with 3 being allowed only if caused by myeloma disease and not by comorbid conditions, were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to four treatment groups. Induction therapy consisted of four 21-day cycles of RVd (lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1–14; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, and 15 for cycles 1–2) or, RVd induction plus elotuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 for cycles 1–2, and on days 1 and 11 for cycles 3–4; E-RVd). Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation was followed by two 21-day cycles of either RVd consolidation (lenalidomide 25 mg orally on days 1–14; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16) or elotuzumab plus RVd consolidation (with elotuzumab 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15) followed by maintenance with either lenalidomide (10 mg orally on days 1–28 for cycles 1–3; thereafter, up to 15 mg orally on days 1–28; RVd/R or E-RVd/R group) or lenalidomide plus elotuzumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15 for cycles 1–6, and on day 1 for cycles 7–26; RVd/E-R or E-RVd/E-R group) for 2 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in a modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Safety was analysed in all patients who received at least one dose of trial medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02495922, and is completed.
Between June 29, 2015, and on Sept 11, 2017, 564 patients were included in the trial. The modified ITT population comprised 559 (243 43% females and 316 57% males) patients and the safety population 555 patients. After a median follow-up of 49·8 months (IQR 43·7–55·5), there was no difference in progression-free survival between the four treatment groups (adjusted log-rank p value, p=0·86), and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 69% (95% CI 61–77), 69% (61–76), 66% (58–74), and 67% (59–75) for patients treated with RVd/R, RVd/E-R, E-RVd/R, and E-RVd/E-R, respectively. Infections (grade 3 or worse) were the most frequently observed adverse event in all treatment groups (28 20% of 137 for RVd/R; 32 23% of 138 for RVd/E-R; 35 25% of 138 for E-RVd/R; and 48 34% of 142 for E-RVd/E-R). Serious adverse events (grade 3 or worse) were observed in 68 (48%) of 142 participants in the E-RVd/E-R group, 53 (39%) of 137 in the RVd/R, 53 (38%) of 138 in the RVd/E-R, and 50 (36%) of 138 in the E-RVd/R (36%) group. There were nine treatment-related deaths during the study. Two deaths (one sepsis and one toxic colitis) in the RVd/R group were considered lenalidomide-related. One death in the RVd/E-R group due to meningoencephalitis was considered lenalidomide and elotuzumab-related. Four deaths (one pulmonary embolism, one septic shock, one atypical pneumonia, and one cardiovascular failure) in the E-RVd/R group and two deaths (one sepsis and one pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis) in the E-RVd/E-R group were considered related to lenalidomide or elotuzumab, or both.
Addition of elotuzumab to RVd induction or consolidation and lenalidomide maintenance in patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma did not provide clinical benefit. Elotuzumab-containing therapies might be reserved for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene and Chugai.
Introduction: Successful mobilization and collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are necessary for lymphoma patients eligible for myeloablative chemotherapy with subsequent ...autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Albeit G-CSF alone or combined with chemotherapy is well-established methods for HSC mobilization, up to 40% of the patients fail to mobilize (poor mobilizer, PM). Plerixafor (PLX) is commonly used in PM patients resulting in increased migration of HSCs into peripheral blood and thus improves the collection outcome. Methods: The prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-interventional OPTIMOB study assessed mobilization and collection parameter of patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma to get deep insights in the treatment of those patients in clinical routine focusing on PM patients. PM was defined as follows: (1) no achievement of ≥20 CD34 + progenitor cells/µL before first apheresis, (2) PLX administration at any time point during the observational period, (3) reduction of the initially planned CD34 + progenitor cell yield as necessity due to failed mobilization or HSC collection, and (4) no performance of apheresis due to low CD34 + progenitor level. Primary objective of the study was to assess mobilization success by the proportion of PM patients achieving >2 × 10 6 CD34 + progenitor cells/kg body weight on the first day of apheresis. Here, the data of the lymphoma cohort are presented. Results: Out of 238 patients with lymphoma documented in the study, 32% were classified as PM. 87% of them received PLX. Demographic data revealed no obvious differences between PM and good mobilizing (GM) patients. All patients were treated highly individualized prior to mobilization. Majority of all PM patients were able to undergo apheresis (95%) and reached their individual requested CD34 + progenitor cell target (72%). 57% of the PM patients achieved >2.0 × 10 6 CD34 + progenitor cells/kg body weight on day 1 of apheresis and nearby 70% of them underwent ASCT. Median time to engraftment was similar in PM and GM patients of the lymphoma cohort. Conclusions: Majority of PM patients with lymphoma were successfully mobilized and underwent ASCT. Most of them received PLX during the study.
Introduction: In patients with a clinical indication for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), sufficient mobilization of CD34 + precursor cells into peripheral blood is ...essential to ensure adequate hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) collection prior to intensive therapy. However, with standard granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)-based mobilization schemes, an important minority of patients fail to mobilize sufficient (e.g., >10/µL) CD34 + cell counts into the peripheral blood and are considered as poor mobilizers (PM). Because failure to achieve sufficient CD34 + cell mobilization can negatively affect important clinical treatment endpoints, the use of plerixafor (PLX) was approved to increase CD34 + mobilization in PM patients. Methods: The German non-interventional, multicenter, open-label, prospective OPTIMOB study evaluated HSC mobilization strategies prior to planned ASCT in adult patients with hematologic malignancies (lymphomas or multiple myeloma MM) focusing on PM patients. PM patients were defined as follows: (1) never achieving ≥20 CD34 + cells/µL before 1st apheresis, (2) receiving PLX at any timepoint of mobilization, (3) their initially planned stem cell yield had to be reduced, or (4) they had not received apheresis due to low CD34 + count in peripheral blood. Results: 168 of 475 MM patients (35%) participating in the OPTIMOB study were classified as PM, and 155 of them (92%) received PLX (PM+PLX) during the study. PM patients were 40–78 years old, slightly more often male (n = 97, 58%), mostly newly diagnosed (n = 146, 87%) and received highly individualized previous treatments. Ninety-four of the PMs underwent chemotherapy mobilization (65%), and 51 patients (35%) received steady-state mobilization with G-CSF only during 1st mobilization attempt. 92% of the total PM population (n = 155) underwent apheresis, 78% of them (n = 117) achieved >2.0 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg body weight on the 1st day of apheresis. PM+PLX had a higher median total collection result than those PM patients without PLX support (7.2 vs. 5.7 × 10 6 CD34 + cells/kg body weight). In total, ASCT was performed in 136 PM+PLX (88%) versus 8 PM−PLX patients (62%). Conclusion: The OPTIMOB study showed that a considerable proportion of adult MM patients in Germany are PMs. Even though most of PMs were supported with PLX in the OPTIMOB study, PM-PLX also successfully mobilized HSCs, allowing ASCT in majority of all PMs. However, further analyses are required for treatment optimization in PMs.
▪
Background: Standard therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has long relied on the combination of All- trans -retinoic acid (ATRA) and chemotherapy. The introduction of arsenic trioxide ...(ATO) into APL treatment resulted in similarly high remission and survival rates coupled with significantly reduced myelosuppression. Recent results of the APL0406 trial by the GIMEMA-AMLSG-SAL study groups showed that the combination of ATRA and ATO is superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in front-line therapy of low/intermediate-risk APL. The implications of these results for the clinical practice of APL patients in Germany have been uncertain given the fact that ATO has only recently been licensed for front-line therapy in APL subgroups.
Aim: In order to provide a picture of the clinical reality of APL patient care in Germany an intergroup APL registry (National acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) observational study, NAPOLEON) was recently initiated by 4 AML study groups.
Methods: Eligible patients are adults at least 18 years of age with newly diagnosed or relapsed APL within the first year after diagnosis. Here we report the analysis on the series of patients prospectively enrolled into this registry. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, received IRB approval by all participating centers and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02192619).
Results: As of August 1st 2017, 150 patients (median age 54 years; range 19-87) with newly diagnosed APL have been included into the study. Among all patients 67% (n=100) were low/intermediate-risk according to the Sanz score. Out of these patients 77% (n=77) received an ATO-ATRA based induction regimen followed by a median of 4 courses of ATO-ATRA consolidation (according to the APL 0406 study).Of 76 patients treated by ATRA-ATO regimen that were evaluable for response to induction, 75 (99%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR). One patient died within 30 days of therapy resulting in an early death rate of 1%. After a median follow-up of 14 months, event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival at 12 months for these patients were 97%, 2% and 97%, respectively. The therapy was well tolerated and no new safety signals have been obtained.
Conclusion: These real life data from a prospective German registry provide further evidence for the safety and sustained anti-leukemic efficacy of ATRA-ATO in low/intermediate-risk APL. These results further support ATRA-ATO as the new standard of care in this clinical setting.
Display omitted
Platzbecker:Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Götze:Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria. Hänel:Roche: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Greil:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel support, Research Funding; Novartis, Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS, Amgen: Honoraria. Greiner:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Hochhaus:Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Fiedler:Amgen: Patents & Royalties; Amgen, Gilead, GSO, Teva, Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Support for meeting attendance; Amgen, ARIAD/Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen, Pfizer: Research Funding. Hiddemann:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Thiede:Roche: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agendix: Employment. Brummendorf:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dohner:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rollig:Janssen: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding.
Background: Standard therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia has long relied on the combination of All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and chemotherapy. The introduction of arsenic trioxide (ATO) in APL ...treatment has allowed achievement of similarly high remission and survival rates coupled with significantly reduced myelosuppression. Recent results of the APL0406 trial by the GIMEMA-AMLSG-SAL study groups showed that the combination of ATRA and arsenic trioxide (ATO) is superior to standard ATRA and chemotherapy (CHT) in front-line therapy of low/intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). The implications of these results for the clinical practice of APL patients in Germany have been uncertain given the fact that ATO is not formally licensed for front-line therapy of APL.
Aim:In order to provide evidence and a reflection of the clinical reality of APL patient care in Germany an intergroup APL registry (National acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) observational study, NAPOLEON) was recently initiated by several AML study groups.
Methods:Eligible patients are adults at least 18 years of age with newly diagnosed or relapsed APL not beyond the first year of diagnosis. Here we report the first analysis on the series of patients prospectively enrolled into this registry. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, received IRB approval by all participating centers and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02192619).
Results: As of August 1st 2016, 88 patients have been included into the study with a median age of 57 years (range 22-87). All had newly diagnosed APL (100%) with 66% (n=58) being of low/intermediate risk according to the Sanz score. Out of those patients 76% (n=44) received an ATO-ATRA based induction regimen followed by a median of 4 courses of consolidation (according to the APL 0406 study).Of 41 patients evaluable for response to induction, 40/41 (98%) patients achieved complete remission (CR) with the ATRA-ATO arms. Early death rate within 30 days of therapy was 2% (1/44). After a median follow-up of 12 months, the event-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival at 12 months for these patients were 97%, 0% and 97%, respectively. Therapy was well tolerated and no new safety signals have been obtained.
Conclusion:These real life data from a prospective German registry provide further evidence for the safety and sustained anti-leukemic efficacy of ATRA-ATO in low/intermediate risk APL. These results further support ATRA-ATO as the new standard of care in this clinical setting.
Display omitted
Platzbecker:TEVA: Honoraria, Research Funding. Greiner:BMS: Research Funding. Thiede:AgenDix: Employment, Other: Ownership. Hochhaus:BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding.
In a up-front randomized study, 939 adult patients up to the age of 60 years received a double induction therapy. One course of MAV (mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 days 4–8, cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous ...infusion days 1–8, etoposide 100 m g/m2 days 4–8) was followed by one cycle of MAMAC (cytarabine 1 g/m2, every 12h days 1–5; amsacrine 100 mg/m2 days 1–5). Patients with intermediate risk cytogenetic (IRCG) and a HLA matched sibling received an allogeneic transplantation, those with poor risk cytogenetic (PRCG) were intended to be transplanted from a sibling or unrelated donor. All AML patients without an available donor received the randomly assigned first postremission therapy (PRT) mitoxantrone combined with intermediate-dose cytarabine (I-MAC; total dose 12 g/m2) or high-dose cytarabine (H-MAC; total dose 36 g/m2). As second PRT, patients with t(8;21) received an additional cycle of chemotherapy. An autologous transplantation was scheduled for IRCG and PRCG without an allogeneic donor. The CR rate was 88% for patients with t(8;21), with IRCG 71%, and 50% with PRCG. The 5-year-survival was 21% (95% CI: 16–27%) in the PRCG, 40% (95% CI: 36–45%) in the IRCG and 74% (95% CI: 60–88%) in the t(8;21) group. No difference was observed between the I-MAC and the H-MAC group. In a multivariate analysis, a significant (p<.01 for each parameter) better overall survival was observed in patients under the age of 37 years, blast count <10% at day 15, high myeloperoxidase positivity, low CD34 expression, WBC <15*10^9/L, thrombocytes >50*10^9/L, and IRCG compared to PRCG. The relapse incidence was higher in patients without an allogeneic donor, a Flt3 mutant/wildtype ratio > 0.8 or PRCG. A risk score build out of the sum of the individual hazard ratios (SHR) was able to discriminate two groups for the IRCG with a marked difference in the 5-year-survival (low SHR: 55% 95% CI: 48–62%; high SHR: 33% 95% CI: 28–38%) was well as for the PRCG group (low SHR: 44% 95% CI: 32–56%; high SHR: 13% 95% CI: 7–18%). The risk score identified in this large patient cohort may allow individual tailoring of therapeutic interventions in future AML trials.
PDF
