High tumor mutation burden (TMB) can benefit immunotherapy for multiple tumor types, but the prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer is not well described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ...frequency, mutational patterns, and genomic profile of hypermutated breast cancer.
We used de-identified data from individuals with primary or metastatic breast cancer from six different publicly available genomic studies. The prevalence of hypermutated breast cancer was determined among 3969 patients' samples that underwent whole exome sequencing or gene panel sequencing. The samples were classified as having high TMB if they had ≥10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). An additional eight patients were identified from a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute cohort for inclusion in the hypermutated cohort. Among the patients with high TMB, the mutational patterns and genomic profiles were determined. A subset of patients was treated with regimens containing PD-1 inhibitors.
The median TMB was 2.63 mut/Mb. The median TMB significantly varied according to the tumor subtype (HR−/HER2− >HER2+ >HR+/HER2−, P < 0.05) and sample type (metastatic > primary, P = 2.2 × 10−16). Hypermutated tumors were found in 198 patients (5%), with enrichment in metastatic versus primary tumors (8.4% versus 2.9%, P = 6.5 × 10−14). APOBEC activity (59.2%), followed by mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd; 36.4%), were the most common mutational processes among hypermutated tumors. Three patients with hypermutated breast cancer—including two with a dominant APOBEC activity signature and one with a dominant MMRd signature—treated with pembrolizumab-based therapies derived an objective and durable response to therapy.
Hypermutation occurs in 5% of all breast cancers with enrichment in metastatic tumors. Different mutational signatures are present in this population with APOBEC activity being the most common dominant process. Preliminary data suggest that hypermutated breast cancers are more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.
•High tumor mutation burden is found in 5% of all breast cancers and is more common in metastatic tumors.•While different mutational signatures are present in hypermutated tumors, APOBEC activity is the most common process.•Patients with hypermutated breast cancers may represent a subgroup more likely to benefit from PD-1 inhibitors.•The response to PD-1 inhibitors in hypermutated breast cancer may be independent of underlying mutational process.
•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations and algorithms for managing metastatic breast cancer.•It covers diagnosis, staging, risk assessment, treatment, disease monitoring, ...palliative care and the patient perspective.•ESMO-MCBS and ESCAT scores are given to describe the levels of evidence for treatment choices.•The authors comprise an international expert group, with recommendations based on available evidence and expert opinion.•In clinical practice, all recommendations provided need to be discussed with patients in a shared decision-making approach.
Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is expressed in epithelial cancers, including hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG; Trodelvy®) is an ...antibody–drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody coupled to SN-38 at a high drug-to-antibody ratio via a unique hydrolyzable linker that delivers SN-38 intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment. SG was granted accelerated FDA approval for metastatic triple-negative BC treatment in April 2020.
We analyzed a prespecified subpopulation of patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) HR+/HER2− mBC from the phase I/II, single-arm trial (NCT01631552), who received intravenous SG (10 mg/kg) and whose disease progressed on endocrine-based therapy and at least one prior chemotherapy for mBC. End points included objective response rate (ORR; RECIST version 1.1) assessed locally, duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.
Fifty-four women were enrolled between 13 February 2015 and 1 June 2017. Median (range) age was 54 (33-79) years and all received at least two prior lines of therapy for mBC. At data cut-off (1 March 2019), 12 patients were still alive. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (50.0%), anemia (11.1%), and diarrhea (7.4%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the ORR was 31.5% 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5%–45.6%; 17 partial responses; median DOR was 8.7 months (95% CI 3.7–12.7), median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.6–7.6), and median OS was 12 months (95% CI 9.0–18.2).
SG shows encouraging activity in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2− mBC and a predictable, manageable safety profile. Further evaluation in a randomized phase III trial (TROPiCS-02) is ongoing (NCT03901339).
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01631552; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01631552
•Safety and efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2–directed antibody–drug conjugate, were evaluated in patients with hormone receptor-positive/epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC).•Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (50.0%), anemia (11.1%), and diarrhea (7.4%).•In 54 patients who received SG (10 mg/kg) and at least two prior lines of therapy for mBC, the objective response rate was 31.5%.•Responses achieved with SG were durable, with a median duration of response of 8.7 months and a median progression-free survival of 5.5 months.•Clinical activity seen is encouraging in relation to current standard-of-care chemotherapies in this setting.
Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with endocrine therapy (ET) previously demonstrated clinically meaningful improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) ...in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer at the second interim analysis, however follow-up was limited. Here, we present results of the prespecified primary outcome analysis and an additional follow-up analysis.
This global, phase III, open-label trial randomized (1 : 1) 5637 patients to adjuvant ET for ≥5 years ± abemaciclib for 2 years. Cohort 1 enrolled patients with ≥4 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), or 1-3 positive ALNs and either grade 3 disease or tumor ≥5 cm. Cohort 2 enrolled patients with 1-3 positive ALNs and centrally determined high Ki-67 index (≥20%). The primary endpoint was IDFS in the intent-to-treat population (cohorts 1 and 2). Secondary endpoints were IDFS in patients with high Ki-67, DRFS, overall survival, and safety.
At the primary outcome analysis, with 19 months median follow-up time, abemaciclib + ET resulted in a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an IDFS event hazard ratio (HR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-0.87; nominal P = 0.0009. At the additional follow-up analysis, with 27 months median follow-up and 90% of patients off treatment, IDFS (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.82; nominal P < 0.0001) and DRFS (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83; nominal P < 0.0001) benefit was maintained. The absolute improvements in 3-year IDFS and DRFS rates were 5.4% and 4.2%, respectively. Whereas Ki-67 index was prognostic, abemaciclib benefit was consistent regardless of Ki-67 index. Safety data were consistent with the known abemaciclib risk profile.
Abemaciclib + ET significantly improved IDFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer, with an acceptable safety profile. Ki-67 index was prognostic, but abemaciclib benefit was observed regardless of Ki-67 index. Overall, the robust treatment benefit of abemaciclib extended beyond the 2-year treatment period.
•Adjuvant abemaciclib combined with ET improved IDFS in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer.•Abemaciclib benefit extended beyond the 2-year treatment period.•Ki-67 ≥20% was prognostic and may be used with clinicopathological features to identify patients at high risk of recurrence.•Adjuvant abemaciclib + ET benefited patients with high-risk clinicopathologic features regardless of Ki-67 index.•Safety data were consistent with the known abemaciclib risk profile.
The pivotal phase III ASCENT trial demonstrated improved survival outcomes associated with sacituzumab govitecan (SG), an anti-trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (anti-Trop-2) antibody-drug conjugate ...linked with the topoisomerase-inhibitor SN-38, over single-agent chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in previously treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). This prespecified, exploratory biomarker analysis from the ASCENT trial evaluates the association between tumor Trop-2 expression and germline BRCA1/2 mutation status with clinical outcomes.
Patients with mTNBC refractory to or progressing after two or more prior chemotherapies, with one or more in the metastatic setting, were randomized to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Biopsy or surgical specimens were collected at study entry to determine Trop-2 expression level using a validated immunohistochemistry assay and histochemical scoring. Germline BRCA1/2 mutation status was collected at baseline.
Of 468 assessable patients, 290 had Trop-2 expression data 64% (n = 151 SG) versus 60% (n = 139 TPC) and 292 had known BRCA1/2 mutation status 63% (n = 149 SG) versus 61% (n = 143 TPC). Median progression-free survival in SG- versus TPC-treated patients was 6.9, 5.6, and 2.7 months versus 2.5, 2.2, and 1.6 months for high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Median overall survival (14.2, 14.9, and 9.3 months versus 6.9, 6.9, and 7.6 months) and objective response rates (44%, 38%, and 22% versus 1%, 11%, and 6%) were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with high, medium, and low Trop-2 expression, respectively. Efficacy outcomes were numerically higher with SG versus TPC in patients with and without germline BRCA1/2 mutations.
SG benefits patients with previously treated mTNBC expressing high/medium Trop-2 compared with standard-of-care chemotherapy and regardless of germline BRCA1/2 mutation status. The small number of patients with low Trop-2 expression precludes definitive conclusions on the benefit of SG in this subgroup.
•The majority of patients (80%) with mTNBC in the ASCENT study with available data had high/medium tumor Trop-2 expression.•Survival outcomes and ORRs were numerically higher in SG- versus TPC-treated patients with high/medium Trop-2 expression.•Benefit of SG in patients with high/medium Trop-2 expression was similar to that of overall primary efficacy population.•The small number of patients with low Trop-2 expression prevents definitive conclusions on benefit of SG in this subgroup.•Benefit of SG over TPC was also similar regardless of germline BRCA1/2 mutation status.
Little is known about mechanisms of resistance to poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and platinum chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer and BRCA1/2 ...mutations. Further investigation of resistance in clinical cohorts may point to strategies to prevent or overcome treatment failure.
We obtained tumor biopsies from metastatic breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency before and after acquired resistance to PARPi or platinum chemotherapy. Whole exome sequencing was carried out on each tumor, germline DNA, and circulating tumor DNA. Tumors underwent RNA sequencing, and immunohistochemical staining for RAD51 foci on tumor sections was carried out for functional assessment of intact homologous recombination (HR).
Pre- and post-resistance tumor samples were sequenced from eight patients (four with BRCA1 and four with BRCA2 mutation; four treated with PARPi and four with platinum). Following disease progression on DNA-damaging therapy, four patients (50%) acquired at least one somatic reversion alteration likely to result in functional BRCA1/2 protein detected by tumor or circulating tumor DNA sequencing. Two patients with germline BRCA1 deficiency acquired genomic alterations anticipated to restore HR through increased DNA end resection: loss of TP53BP1 in one patient and amplification of MRE11A in another. RAD51 foci were acquired post-resistance in all patients with genomic reversion, consistent with reconstitution of HR. All patients whose tumors demonstrated RAD51 foci post-resistance were intrinsically resistant to subsequent lines of DNA-damaging therapy.
Genomic reversion in BRCA1/2 was the most commonly observed mechanism of resistance, occurring in four of eight patients. Novel sequence alterations leading to increased DNA end resection were seen in two patients, and may be targetable for therapeutic benefit. The presence of RAD51 foci by immunohistochemistry was consistent with BRCA1/2 protein functional status from genomic data and predicted response to later DNA-damaging therapy, supporting RAD51 focus formation as a clinically useful biomarker.
•We analyzed mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitor/platinum chemotherapy in BRCA1/2-mutant metastatic breast cancer.•Genomic reversion to functional BRCA1/2 protein was identified in one-half of patients.•Up-regulation of DNA end resection was identified as a resistance mechanism in two additional patients.•RAD51 foci assessed by immunohistochemistry correlated with clinical response to PARP inhibitor/platinum.•RAD51 focus staining warrants further exploration as a biomarker for clinical use.
Standard chemotherapy is associated with low response rates and short progression-free survival among patients with pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy is ...an antibody-drug conjugate that combines a humanized monoclonal antibody, which targets the human trophoblast cell-surface antigen 2 (Trop-2), with SN-38, which is conjugated to the antibody by a cleavable linker. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy enables delivery of high concentrations of SN-38 to tumors.
We conducted a phase 1/2 single-group, multicenter trial involving patients with advanced epithelial cancers who received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. A total of 108 patients received sacituzumab govitecan-hziy at a dose of 10 mg per kilogram of body weight after receiving at least two previous anticancer therapies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. The end points included safety; the objective response rate (according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1), which was assessed locally; the duration of response; the clinical benefit rate (defined as a complete or partial response or stable disease for at least 6 months); progression-free survival; and overall survival. Post hoc analyses determined the response rate and duration, which were assessed by blinded independent central review.
The 108 patients with triple-negative breast cancer had received a median of 3 previous therapies (range, 2 to 10). Four deaths occurred during treatment; 3 patients (2.8%) discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (in ≥10% of the patients) included anemia and neutropenia; 10 patients (9.3%) had febrile neutropenia. The response rate (3 complete and 33 partial responses) was 33.3% (95% confidence interval CI, 24.6 to 43.1), and the median duration of response was 7.7 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 10.8); as assessed by independent central review, these values were 34.3% and 9.1 months, respectively. The clinical benefit rate was 45.4%. Median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 6.3), and overall survival was 13.0 months (95% CI, 11.2 to 13.7).
Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy was associated with durable objective responses in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Myelotoxic effects were the main adverse reactions. (Funded by Immunomedics; IMMU-132-01 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01631552.).
PDF
