IntroductionCardiovascular disorders have been extensively reported during COVID-19 illness, including arrhythmias such as atrioventricular conduction disturbances. To date, one case of transient ...heart block has been reported after COVID-19 vaccine. Case presentationA 73 years-old woman presented with shortness of breath and fatigue 2 weeks after receiving her second dose of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. ECG showed complete AV block with normal narrow QRS complexes. Chronic treatment with Bisoprolol for hypertension was stopped but complete AV block persisted 48 hours thereafter. Therefore, a permanent pacemaker was implanted. Three months later, pacemaker follow-up revealed no ventricular stimulation, suggesting complete recovery of AV conduction, even after resumption of bisoprolol. Five months after the second dose, she received a third dose of the same vaccine. Three weeks later, she once again complained of dyspnea on exertion. ECG showed sinus rhythm with permanent ventricular stimulation. After device inhibition, complete AV block was confirmed and, 2 weeks later, conduction was restored once more. Clinical discussionIt is known that vaccines can induce AV conduction disturbances, mostly reversible. The underlying mechanisms leading to high-degree AV block remain unclear and are probably multiple. Although being exceptional after COVID-19 vaccine, our case illustrates the fact that the latter can induce such a disturbance which may be transient and recurrent even in the absence of underlying conduction disorder. ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination may transitorily interfere with cardiac conduction system even in subjects without known underlying heart disease.
A multicentre study compared tianeptine (37·5 mg/day), an original psychotropic compound characterized by both antidepressant and anxiolytic potentials, with a reference antidepressant, mianserin (60 ...mg/day) and a reference anxiolytic, alprazolam (1·5 mg/day), in the treatment of 152 patients fulfilling DSM‐III‐R criteria for adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features (anxiety and depression). The study used a double‐blind parallel design over a 6‐week period. Clinical assessments included the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), the Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS), the Hamilton anxiety rating scale, a visual analogue scale, and the somatic scale of the system developed by the Association for the Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP). Results showed very similar improvement in the three treatment groups on all rating instruments. Moreover, the number of patients exhibiting adverse events did not differ among the three groups. Therefore, these results show similar antidepressant and anxiolytic activity for tianeptine, mianserin and alprazolam in patients suffering from adjustment disorder with mixed emotional features. These promising findings should however be confirmed in a placebo‐controlled trial.
The efficacy and the tolerance of milnacipran (100 mg/day), a second generation antidepressant which equipotently inhibits both noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake, was compared to fluoxetine (20 ...mg/day), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, in two parallel groups of, respectively, 97 and 93 major depressive outpatients. The duration of the study was 6 weeks, with assessments every 2 weeks by means of the Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADRS), the Hamilton depression scale, the clinical global impressions (CGI), and a checklist of symptoms and side-effects. Results showed significant superiority of fluoxetine over milnacipran on most rating instruments: MADRS (P = 0.01) including five individual items, Hamilton depression scale (P = 0.002) including ten individual items, CGI of severity (P = 0.01) and therapeutical index (P = 0.002). On visual analogue scales assessing the clinical profile of the compounds, fluoxetine was rated as exhibiting more psychostimulating activity than milnacipran (P = 0.0008). The tolerance of the two antidepressants was very similar, with the exception of symptoms of dizziness which were more frequently reported with milnacipran (P = 0.01). These differences in efficacy favoring fluoxetine could result from the selection of a dose of milnacipran below the optimal therapeutic dose for this type of psychiatric patients or to the administration of the compounds in single daily intakes, whereas milnacipran possesses a plasma elimination half-life of only 7 h.
The development of antenatal ultrasonography and the detection of fetal uropathies has created a new field for paediatric urologists. The embryology and physiology of the fetal renal tract is still ...poorly understood. It is, however, recognised that delays in the maturation of the renal system can lead to transient dilatation of the urinary tract. Structural and functional anomalies can also result in dilatation, but these are permanent. The ability to distinguish between the transient and permanent impairments to urine flow represents a diagnostic challenge. This review article discusses the pathophysiology of urine flow impairment, antenatal detection and the postnatal management of the common congenital uropathies.
Nefazodone, a phenylpiperazine antidepressant, exhibits novel dual activity on serotonin (5-HT) neurons; it binds to 5-HT2 receptors and inhibits 5-HT reuptake. Flexible doses of nefazodone (100-400 ...mg/day) and amitriptyline (50-200 mg/day) were compared in 106 major depressive inpatients in a 6-week double-blind study. Results showed significant superiority of amitriptyline over nefazodone on all rating instruments: Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale (P < 0.0001), Hamilton depression scale (P < 0.0006), Clinical Global Impressions (P < 0.0001) and Patient Global Assessment (P < 0.01). A total of 65% of patients under amitriptyline and 56% of patients under nefazodone reported adverse events during the study, with significantly more dry mouth in the amitriptyline group (39% versus 11%, P = 0.001). Modal daily doses within the last treatment week reached 242 mg with nefazodone and 124 mg with amitriptyline. The lower efficacy of nefazodone, which contradicts comparative trials with imipramine in US patients, is discussed with regard to the dose of nefazodone, probably below the optimal therapeutic range for melancholic patients, and to the clinical differences between the patient samples.
A multicenter controlled study was designed to test the hypothesis that a loading dose of an antidepressant could shorten the latency of its clinical efficacy. Three parallel groups of about 40 ...endogenous depressive inpatients received either a loading dose of milnacipran (300 mg daily for 2 weeks and 150 mg daily during the 2 following weeks), the standard regimen of milnacipran in severe depression (200 mg daily for 4 weeks), or fluvoxamine (200 mg daily for 4 weeks). The duration of the study was 4 weeks, with assessments at baseline and after 4, 9, 14, 21, and 28 days of therapy by means of Montgomery and Asberg depression scale (MADS), the Hamilton depression scale, the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI), and a checklist of symptoms and side-effects. Results showed very similar evolution in the 3 treatment groups. In addition, the level of side-effects did not exhibit significant differences among the treatment groups, except for excitement-nervousness and akathisia which were more frequently reported with fluvoxamine. These results do not support the usefulness of a loading dose of an antidepressant such as milnacipran. They demonstrate however that milnacipran can be given at a 300 mg daily dose from the very first day of treatment with an excellent tolerance.
PDF
