Oral mucositis (OM) has emerged as a common cause of dose delays and interruptions of cancer therapies such as multicycle chemotherapy, myeloablative chemotherapy, and radiotherapy with or without ...concurrent chemotherapy of head and neck cancer. Research into both preventive and management strategies has lagged behind research into the common cancer treatment-related morbidities of nausea, vomiting, and cytopenias. This disparity is related to the complex risk assessment of multifactorial patient and treatment factors and different techniques of rating mucositis. In addition, relatively few clinical trials have focused on mucositis as a specific outcome. Currently, the only effective preventive strategies include the use of palifermin to prevent OM in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and oral cryotherapy used in conjunction with bolus 5-FU, melphalan, or edatrexate. For the most part, managing OM relies on supportive care and symptom palliation. However, OM is a common problem associated with significant patient morbidity and increased resource use. The magnitude of the problem demands innovative approaches based on expert judgment as evidence accumulates to support specific recommendations. To improve this situation, the NCCN convened a multidisciplinary task force to address key issues. This report integrates expert judgment with a review of key literature on risk assessment, prevention, and treatment strategies, and provides recommendations for the overall management of OM.
Limited data exist to guide the treatment technique for reirradiation of recurrent or second primary squamous carcinoma of the head and neck. We performed a multi-institution retrospective cohort ...study to investigate the effect of the elective treatment volume, dose, and fractionation on outcomes and toxicity.
Patients with recurrent or second primary squamous carcinoma originating in a previously irradiated field (≥40 Gy) who had undergone reirradiation with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT); (≥40 Gy re-IMRT) were included. The effect of elective nodal treatment, dose, and fractionation on overall survival (OS), locoregional control, and acute and late toxicity were assessed. The Kaplan-Meier and Gray's competing risks methods were used for actuarial endpoints.
From 8 institutions, 505 patients were included in the present updated analysis. The elective neck was not treated in 56.4% of patients. The median dose of re-IMRT was 60 Gy (range 39.6-79.2). Hyperfractionation was used in 20.2%. Systemic therapy was integrated for 77.4% of patients. Elective nodal radiation therapy did not appear to decrease the risk of locoregional failure (LRF) or improve the OS rate. Doses of ≥66 Gy were associated with improvements in both LRF and OS in the definitive re-IMRT setting. However, dose did not obviously affect LRF or OS in the postoperative re-IMRT setting. Hyperfractionation was not associated with improved LRF or OS. The rate of acute grade ≥3 toxicity was 22.1% overall. On multivariable logistic regression, elective neck irradiation was associated with increased acute toxicity in the postoperative setting. The rate of overall late grade ≥3 toxicity was 16.7%, with patients treated postoperatively with hyperfractionation experiencing the highest rates.
Doses of ≥66 Gy might be associated with improved outcomes in high-performance patients undergoing definitive re-IMRT. Postoperatively, doses of 50 to 66 Gy appear adequate after removal of gross disease. Hyperfractionation and elective neck irradiation were not associated with an obvious benefit and might increase toxicity.
Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has a favorable prognosis. Current research de-escalates treatment, aiming to improve quality of life (QOL). Understanding the QOL ...experience with current standard treatment (chemoradiation therapy) provides context for emerging data. We report the impact of p16 status on QOL for patients with stage III or IV OPC undergoing chemoradiation therapy in an international phase 3 trial (TROG 02.02 HeadSTART).
A subgroup analysis by p16 status was conducted in patients with OPC treated in a phase 3 randomized trial. The study subset with OPC and known p16 status was mainly from Australasia, Western Europe, and North America. Of 861 participants, 200 had OPC, known p16 status, and baseline QOL data; 82 were p16 negative and 118 were p16 positive. Radiation therapy (70 Gy over a period of 7 weeks) was given concurrently with 3 cycles of either cisplatin (100 mg/m
) or cisplatin (75 mg/m
) plus tirapazamine. QOL was measured with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) questionnaire at baseline and 2, 6, 12, 23, and 38 months. Because no significant difference in QOL score was observed between arms, results by p16 status are reported with arms combined.
The p16-positive patients were younger, had a better Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and were less often current smokers. Our primary hypothesis that the change in FACT-H&N score from baseline to 6 months would be more favorable in the p16-positive cohort was not met (p16 positive, -6.3; p16 negative, -1.8; P=.14). The mean baseline FACT-H&N score was statistically and clinically significantly better in p16-positive patients (111 vs 102, P<.001); at 2 months, scores declined in both groups but more dramatically for p16-positive patients. By 12 months, p16-positive patients again had superior scores. A higher baseline FACT-H&N score and p16-positive status were independent predictors of overall survival.
Patients with p16-positive OPC exhibited better baseline QOL but showed a more dramatic QOL drop with concurrent chemoradiation. Given the favorable prognosis of p16-positive OPC, efforts to reduce the QOL burden of treatment are warranted.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been consistently found to be an independent predictor of local-regional relapse (LRR) after radiotherapy. We assessed the extent by which ...it can refine risk classification for overall survival (OS) and LRR in patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
EGFR expression in locally advanced HNSCC was measured by immunohistochemistry in a series of patients randomized to receive accelerated or conventional radiation regimens in a Phase III trial. Subsequently, data of the two series were pooled (N = 533) for conducting a recursive partitioning analysis that incorporated clinical parameters (e.g., performance status, primary site, T and N categories) and four molecular markers (EGFR, p53, Ki-67, and microvessel density).
This study confirmed that patients with higher than median levels of tumor EGFR expression had a lower OS (relative risk RR: 1.90, p = 0.0010) and a higher LRR (RR: 1.91, p = 0.0163). Of the four markers analyzed, only EGFR was found to contribute to refining classification of patients into three risk classes with distinct OS and LRR outcomes. The addition of EGFR to three clinical parameters could identify patients having up to a fivefold difference in the risk of LRR.
Adding pretreatment EGFR expression data to known robust clinical prognostic variables improved the estimation of the probability for OS and LRR after radiotherapy. Its use for stratifying or selecting patients with defined tumor feature and pattern of relapse for enrollment into clinical trials testing specific therapeutic strategy warrants further investigation.
Background
Following wide excision of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is typically recommended. Controversy remains as to whether RT can be avoided in selected ...cases, such as those with negative margins. Additionally, there is evidence that RT can influence survival.
Methods
We included 171 patients treated for non-metastatic MCC from 1994 through 2012 at a single institution. Patients without pathologic nodal evaluation (clinical N0 disease) were excluded to reflect modern treatment practice. The endpoints included local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS).
Results
Median follow-up was 33 months. Treatment with RT was associated with improved 3-year LC (91.2 vs. 76.9 %, respectively;
p
= 0.01), LRC (79.5 vs. 59.1 %;
p
= 0.004), DFS (57.0 vs. 30.2 %;
p
< 0.001), and OS (73 vs. 66 %;
p
= 0.02), and was associated with improved 3-year DSS among node-positive patients (76.2 vs. 48.1 %;
p
= 0.035), but not node-negative patients (90.1 vs. 80.8 %;
p
= 0.79). On multivariate analysis, RT was associated with improved LC hazard ratio (HR) 0.18, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.46;
p
< 0.001, LRC (HR 0.28, 95 % CI 0.14–0.56;
p
< 0.001), DFS (HR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.26–0.70;
p
= 0.001), OS (HR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.31–0.93;
p
= 0.03), and DSS (HR 0.42, 95 % CI 0.26–0.70;
p
= 0.001). Patients with negative margins had significant improvements in 3-year LC (90.1 vs. 75.4 %;
p
< 0.001) with RT. Deaths not attributable to MCC were relatively evenly distributed between the RT and no RT groups (28.5 and 29.3 % of patients, respectively).
Conclusions
RT for MCC was associated with improved LRC and survival. RT appeared to be beneficial regardless of margin status.
Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy is the standard alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with locally advanced laryngeal cancer. The value of ...adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy and the optimal timing of chemotherapy are unknown.
We randomly assigned patients with locally advanced cancer of the larynx to one of three treatments: induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin, or radiotherapy alone. The primary end point was preservation of the larynx.
A total of 547 patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years. At two years, the proportion of patients who had an intact larynx after radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin (88 percent) differed significantly from the proportions in the groups given induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (75 percent, P=0.005) or radiotherapy alone (70 percent, P<0.001). The rate of locoregional control was also significantly better with radiotherapy and concurrent cisplatin (78 percent, vs. 61 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 56 percent with radiotherapy alone). Both of the chemotherapy-based regimens suppressed distant metastases and resulted in better disease-free survival than radiotherapy alone. However, overall survival rates were similar in all three groups. The rate of high-grade toxic effects was greater with the chemotherapy-based regimens (81 percent with induction cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by radiotherapy and 82 percent with radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin, vs. 61 percent with radiotherapy alone). The mucosal toxicity of concurrent radiotherapy and cisplatin was nearly twice as frequent as the mucosal toxicity of the other two treatments during radiotherapy.
In patients with laryngeal cancer, radiotherapy with concurrent administration of cisplatin is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone for laryngeal preservation and locoregional control.
To evaluate the severity of cetuximab-induced skin rash and its correlation with clinical outcome and late skin toxicity in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with ...chemoradiation therapy and cetuximab.
Analysis included patients who received loading dose and ≥1 cetuximab dose concurrent with definitive chemoradiation therapy (70 Gy + cisplatin) or postoperative chemoradiation therapy (60-66 Gy + docetaxel or cisplatin).
Six hundred two patients were analyzed; 383 (63.6%) developed grade 2 to 4 cetuximab rash. Patients manifesting grade 2 to 4 rash had younger age (P<.001), fewer pack-years smoking history (P<.001), were more likely to be males (P=.04), and had p16-negative (P=.04) oropharyngeal tumors (P=.003). In univariate analysis, grade 2 to 4 rash was associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio HR 0.58, P<.001) and progression-free survival (HR 0.75, P=.02), and reduced distant metastasis rate (HR 0.61, P=.03), but not local-regional failure (HR 0.79, P=.16) relative to grade 0 to 1 rash. In multivariable analysis, HRs for overall survival, progression-free survival, distant metastasis, and local-regional failure were, respectively, 0.68 (P=.008), 0.85 (P=.21), 0.64 (P=.06), and 0.89 (P=.48). Grade ≥2 rash was associated with improved survival in p16-negative patients (HR 0.28 95% confidence interval 0.11-0.74) but not in p16-positive patients (HR 1.10 0.42-2.89) (P=.05 for interaction). Twenty-five percent of patients with grade 2 to 4 acute in-field radiation dermatitis experienced grade 2 to 4 late skin fibrosis, versus 14% of patients with grade 0 to 1 acute in-field radiation dermatitis (P=.002).
Grade 2 to 4 cetuximab rash was associated with better survival, possibly due to reduction of distant metastasis. This observation was noted mainly in p16-negative patients. Grade 2 to 4 acute in-field radiation dermatitis was associated with higher rate of late grade 2 to 4 skin fibrosis.
PDF
