DANISH (The Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators ICDs in Patients With Nonischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) found that primary-prevention ICD ...implantation was not associated with an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure during a median follow-up of 5.6 years, although there was a beneficial effect on all-cause mortality in patients ≤70 years. This study presents an additional 4 years of follow-up data from DANISH.
In DANISH, 556 patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure were randomized to receive an ICD and 560 to receive usual clinical care and followed until June 30, 2016. In this long-term follow-up study, patients were followed until May 18, 2020. Analyses were conducted for the overall population and according to age (≤70 and >70 years).
During a median follow-up of 9.5 years (25th-75th percentile, 7.9-10.9 years), 208/556 patients (37%) in the ICD group and 226/560 patients (40%) in the control group died. Compared with the control group, the ICD group did not have significantly lower all-cause mortality (hazard ratio HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.74-1.08;
= 0.24). In patients ≤70 years (n = 829), all-cause mortality was lower in the ICD group than the control group (117/389 30% versus 158/440 36%; HR, 0.78 95% CI, 0.61-0.99;
= 0.04), whereas in patients >70 years (n = 287), all-cause mortality was not significantly different between the ICD and control group (91/167 54% versus 68/120 57%; HR, 0.92 95% CI, 0.67-1.28;
= 0.75). Cardiovascular death showed similar trends (overall, 147/556 26% versus 164/560 29%; HR, 0.87 95% CI, 0.70-1.09;
= 0.20; ≤70 years, 87/389 22% versus 122/440 28%; HR, 0.75 95% CI, 0.57-0.98;
= 0.04; >70 years, 60/167 36% versus 42/120 35%; HR, 0.97 95% CI, 0.65-1.45;
= 0.91). The ICD group had a significantly lower incidence of sudden cardiovascular death in the overall population (35/556 6% versus 57/560 10%; HR, 0.60 95% CI, 0.40-0.92;
= 0.02) and in patients ≤70 years (19/389 5% versus 49/440 11%; HR, 0.42 95% CI, 0.24-0.71;
= 0.0008), but not in patients >70 years (16/167 10% versus 8/120 7%; HR, 1.34 95% CI, 0.56-3.19;
= 0.39).
During a median follow-up of 9.5 years, ICD implantation did not provide an overall survival benefit in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure. In patients ≤70 years, ICD implantation was associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and sudden cardiovascular death. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00542945.
The benefit of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure caused by coronary artery disease has been well documented. However, the evidence ...for a benefit of prophylactic ICDs in patients with systolic heart failure that is not due to coronary artery disease has been based primarily on subgroup analyses. The management of heart failure has improved since the landmark ICD trials, and many patients now receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).
In a randomized, controlled trial, 556 patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction, ≤35%) not caused by coronary artery disease were assigned to receive an ICD, and 560 patients were assigned to receive usual clinical care (control group). In both groups, 58% of the patients received CRT. The primary outcome of the trial was death from any cause. The secondary outcomes were sudden cardiac death and cardiovascular death.
After a median follow-up period of 67.6 months, the primary outcome had occurred in 120 patients (21.6%) in the ICD group and in 131 patients (23.4%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.68 to 1.12; P=0.28). Sudden cardiac death occurred in 24 patients (4.3%) in the ICD group and in 46 patients (8.2%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.82; P=0.005). Device infection occurred in 27 patients (4.9%) in the ICD group and in 20 patients (3.6%) in the control group (P=0.29).
In this trial, prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure not caused by coronary artery disease was not associated with a significantly lower long-term rate of death from any cause than was usual clinical care. (Funded by Medtronic and others; DANISH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00542945 .).
Left atrial (LA) dilation in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) may be an indicator of advanced disease. We aimed to investigate the association between LA volume index and left ventricular ...(LV) morphology assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI), and to assess the association with cardiac events. Ninety-two asymptomatic patients with aortic valve area <1 cm2, aortic peak jet velocity >3.5 m/s, and ejection fraction ≥50% were prospectively enrolled and divided according to echocardiographic-derived LA volume index <35 ml/m2. Patients underwent echocardiography, cMRI, exercise testing, and were followed for the composite end point of death, readmission, or aortic valve replacement. Aortic valve area index was similar (0.45 ± 0.08 cm2/m2 vs 0.45 ± 0.09 cm2/m2, p = 0.85) in patients with a dilated and normal LA. On cMRI patients with dilated LA were characterized by higher LV mass index (73 ± 17 g/m2 vs 66 ± 16 g/m2, p = 0.03), increased right ventricle (70 ± 14 ml/m2 vs 63 ± 12 ml/m2, p = 0.01) and LV end-diastolic volume index (84 ± 18 ml/m2 vs 77 ± 16 ml/m2, p = 0.05), and higher brain natriuretic peptide. Late enhancement pattern was similar. During follow-up 20 events were recorded in patients with LA dilation compared with 8 in patients with normal LA (adjusted hazard ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.19 to 6.46, p = 0.02); also B-type natriuretic peptide >125 pg/ml was associated with adverse outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 3.63, 95% confidence interval interval 1.28 to 10.32, p = 0.02). LA dilation is associated with LV remodeling and provides prognostic information in severe asymptomatic AS.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease in which left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is common. However, the association between diastolic dysfunction and right ventricular (RV) loading ...conditions and function has not been investigated in asymptomatic AS patients.
A total of 41 patients underwent right heart catheterization and simultaneous echocardiography at rest and during maximal supine exercise, stratified according to resting diastolic function. Cardiac chamber size and morphology was assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI). RV stroke work index, pulmonary artery (PA) compliance, PA elastance, PA pulsatility index, and right atrial pressure (RAP) were calculated at rest and maximal exercise. Ten patients (24%) had normal LV filling pattern, 20 patients (49%) had grade 1, and 11 patients (27%) had grade 2 diastolic dysfunction. Compared to patients with normal diastolic filling pattern, patients with diastolic dysfunction had lower RV end-diastolic volume (66 ± 11 ml/m2 vs. 79 ± 15 ml/m2, p = 0.02) and end-systolic volume (25 ± 7 ml/m2 vs. 32 ± 9 ml/m2, p = 0.04). An increase in mean RAP to ≥15 mmHg following exercise was not seen in patients with normal LV filling, compared to 4 patients (20%) with mild and 7 patients (63%) with moderate diastolic dysfunction (p = 0.003). PA pressure and PA elastance was increased in grade 2 diastolic dysfunction and correlated with RV volume and maximal oxygen consumption (r = -0.71, p < 0.001).
Moderate diastolic dysfunction is associated with increased RV afterload (elastance), which is compensated at rest, but is associated with increased RAP and inversely related to maximal oxygen consumption during maximal exercise.
AimsIn aortic stenosis (AS), there is poor association between symptoms and conventional markers of AS severity or left ventricular (LV) systolic function. This may reflect that symptoms arise from ...LV diastolic dysfunction or that aortic valve area (AVA) and transvalvular gradient do not reflect afterload. We aimed to study the impact of afterload (end-systolic wall stress ESWS) on the presence of symptoms in AS and to test whether symptoms are related to increased ESWS or LV remodelling.Methods and resultsIn a prospective study, ESWS was estimated by measuring LV wall thickness from MRI and estimated LV end systolic pressure from echocardiographic mean gradient and systolic blood pressure in 78 patients with severe AS scheduled for aortic valve replacement and 91 patients with asymptomatic severe AS. Symptomatic patients had lower indexed AVA (0.40±0.11 vs 0.45±0.09 cm2/m2, p=0.009). They had undergone more extensive remodelling (MRI LV mass index LVMi: 85±24 vs 69±17 g/m2, p<0.0001), had higher tricuspid regurgitant gradient (24±8 mm Hg vs 19 ± 7 mm Hg, p=0.0001) and poorer global longitudinal strain (−15.6±3.8 vs −19.9±3.2%, p<0.0001). ESWS was higher among symptomatic patients (96±51 vs 76±25 kdynes/cm2, p=0.003). Multivariate logistic regression identified echocardiographic relative wall thickness, tricuspid gradient, mitral deceleration time, early diastolic strain rate, MRI LVMi, MRI LV end-diastolic volume index and ESWS as independently associated with being symptomatic.ConclusionESWS can be estimated from multimodality imaging combining MRI and echocardiography. It is correlated with LV remodelling and neurohormonal activation and is independently associated with symptomatic status in AS.
The DANISH study (Danish Study to Assess the Efficacy of ICDs Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in Patients With Non-Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure on Mortality) did not demonstrate an overall ...effect on all-cause mortality with ICD implantation. However, the prespecified subgroup analysis suggested a possible age-dependent association between ICD implantation and mortality with survival benefit seen only in the youngest patients. The nature of this relationship between age and outcome of a primary prevention ICD in patients with nonischemic systolic heart failure warrants further investigation.
All 1116 patients from the DANISH study were included in this prespecified subgroup analysis. We assessed the relationship between ICD implantation and mortality by age, and an optimal age cutoff was estimated nonparametrically with selection impact curves. Modes of death were divided into sudden cardiac death and nonsudden death and compared between patients younger and older than this age cutoff with the use of χ
analysis.
Median age of the study population was 63 years (range, 21-84 years). There was a linearly decreasing relationship between ICD and mortality with age (hazard ratio HR, 1.03; 95% confidence interval CI, 1.003-1.06;
=0.03). An optimal age cutoff for ICD implantation was present at ≤70 years. There was an association between reduced all-cause mortality and ICD in patients ≤70 years of age (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.96;
=0.03) but not in patients >70 years of age (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.68-1.62;
=0.84). For patients ≤70 years old, the sudden cardiac death rate was 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5) and nonsudden death rate was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.1-3.5) events per 100 patient-years, whereas for patients >70 years old, the sudden cardiac death rate was 1.6 (95% CI, 0.8-3.2) and nonsudden death rate was 5.4 (95% CI, 3.7-7.8) events per 100 patient-years. This difference in modes of death between the 2 age groups was statistically significant (
=0.01).
In patients with systolic heart failure not caused by ischemic heart disease, the association between the ICD and survival decreased linearly with increasing age. In this study population, an age cutoff for ICD implantation at ≤70 years yielded the highest survival for the population as a whole.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00542945.
Aims
To determine the effect of the glucagon‐like peptide‐1 analogue liraglutide on left ventricular function in chronic heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes.
Methods and results
...LIVE was an investigator‐initiated, randomised, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled multicentre trial. Patients (n = 241) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤45%) were recruited (February 2012 to August 2015). Patients were clinically stable and on optimal heart failure treatment. Intervention was liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily or matching placebo for 24 weeks. The LVEF was similar at baseline in the liraglutide and the placebo group (33.7 ± 7.6% vs. 35.4 ± 9.4%). Change in LVEF did not differ between the liraglutide and the placebo group; mean difference (95% confidence interval) was −0.8% (−2.1, 0.5; P = 0.24). Heart rate increased with liraglutide mean difference: 7 b.p.m. (5, 9), P < 0.0001. Serious cardiac events were seen in 12 (10%) patients treated with liraglutide compared with 3 (3%) patients in the placebo group (P = 0.04).
Conclusion
Liraglutide did not affect left ventricular systolic function compared with placebo in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes. Treatment with liraglutide was associated with an increase in heart rate and more serious cardiac adverse events, and this raises some concern with respect to the use of liraglutide in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular function. More data on the safety of liraglutide in different subgroups of heart failure patients are needed.
Inhibition of the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2i) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but the mechanism by which they improve outcomes ...remains unclear.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin on central hemodynamics in patients with HF and HFrEF.
This investigator-initiated, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial enrolled 70 patients with HFrEF from March 6, 2018, to September 10, 2019. Patients were assigned to empagliflozin of 10 mg or matching placebo once daily on guideline-driven HF therapy for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was ratio of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) to cardiac index (CI) at peak exercise after 12 weeks. Patients underwent right-heart catheterization at rest and during exercise at baseline and 12-week follow-up.
Patients with HFrEF, mean age of 57 years, mean left-ventricular ejection fraction, 26%, and 12 (17%) with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized. There was no significant treatment effect on peak PCWP/CI (−0.13 mm Hg/l/min/m2; 95% confidence interval: −1.60 to 1.34 mm Hg/l/min/m2; p = 0.86). Considering hemodynamics over the full range of exercise loads, PCWP was significantly reduced (−2.40 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval: −3.96 to −0.84 mm Hg; p = 0.003), but not CI (−0.09 l/min/m2; 95% confidence interval: −0.14 to 0.32 l/min/m2; p = 0.448) by empagliflozin. This was consistent among patients with and without type 2 diabetes.
Among patients with stable HFrEF, empagliflozin for 12 weeks reduced PCWP compared with placebo. There was no significant improvement in neither CI nor PCWP/CI at rest or exercise.
Display omitted
To investigate the effect of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin on N-terminal pro-b-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ...ejection fraction (HFrEF).
Empire HF was an investigator-initiated, multi-center, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Patients with mildly symptomatic HFrEF, mean (standard deviation (SD)) age 64 (11) years, 85% male, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 29% (8), on recommended HF therapy were assigned to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the between-group difference in the change of NT-proBNP from baseline to 12 weeks. In total, 95 patients were assigned to empagliflozin and 95 to placebo. No significant difference in the change of NT-proBNP with empagliflozin versus placebo was observed Empagliflozin: baseline, median (interquartile range (IQR)) 582 (304-1020) pg/mL, 12 weeks, 478 (281-961) pg/mL; Placebo: baseline, 605 (322-1070) pg/mL, 12 weeks, 520 (267-1075) pg/mL, adjusted ratio of change empagliflozin/placebo 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.11, P = 0.7. Further, no significant difference was observed in accelerometer-measured daily activity level adjusted mean difference of change, empagliflozin versus placebo, -26.0 accelerometer counts; 95% CI -88.0 to 36.0, P = 0.4 or Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score adjusted mean difference of change, empagliflozin versus placebo 0.8; 95% CI -2.3 to 3.9, P = 0.6.
In low-risk patients with HFrEF with mild symptoms and on recommended HF therapy, empagliflozin did not change NT-proBNP after 12 weeks. Further, no change in daily activity level or health status was observed.
Display omitted
Aims
With improvement in survival of chronic heart failure (HF), the clinical importance of co‐morbidity is increasing. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and risk of cancer and ...all‐cause mortality in a large Danish HF cohort.
Methods and results
A total of 9307 outpatients with verified HF without a prior diagnosis of cancer (27% female, mean age 68 years, 89% with LVEF <45%) were included in the study. A diagnosis of any cancer and all‐cause mortality was obtained from Danish national registries. Outcome was compared with the general Danish population. Overall and type‐specific risk of cancer was analysed in an adjusted Poisson and Cox regression analysis. The 975 diagnoses of cancer in the HF cohort and 330 843 in the background population corresponded to incidence rates per 10 000 patient‐years of 188.9 95% confidence interval (CI) 177.2–200.6 and 63.0 (95% CI 63.0–63.4), respectively. When stratified by age, incidence rates were increased in all age groups in the HF cohort. Risk of any type of cancer was increased, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.24 (95% CI 1.15–1.33, c < 0.0001). Type‐specific analysis demonstrated an increased hazard ratio for all major types of cancer except for prostate cancer. All‐cause mortality was higher in HF patients with cancer compared with cancer patients from the background population.
Conclusions
Patients with HF have an increased risk of cancer, which persists after the first year after the diagnosis of HF, and their prognosis is worse compared with that of cancer patients without HF.
PDF
