Background
Hypersensitivity reactions to anticancer chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies may lead to discontinuation of first-line treatment options. Identification of these reactions can provide ...specific diagnosis and treatment by rapid drug desensitizations.
Objective
To determine the hypersensitivity reactions involved in anticancer chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies, and the safety and efficacy of rapid drug desensitization.
Methods
We conducted an observational study of hypersensitivity reaction presented after the administration of anticancer chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies in Mexico. We documented the symptoms of initial reaction and their severity, and the results of skin tests. We also report our experience of the administration of 12-step (mild-moderate reactions) and 16-step (severe reactions) desensitization protocols in these patients.
Results
Overall, 93 patients received 336 rapid drug desensitization; 105 to taxanes, 115 to platinum drugs, 101 to monoclonal antibodies, and 15 other anticancer chemotherapy. Hypersensitivity reaction to taxanes occurred in the first or second administration, platinum drugs after the sixth cycle, and rituximab in the first cycle. The most common symptom in carboplatin was urticaria, paclitaxel back pain, oxaliplatin and docetaxel dyspnea, and in the monoclonal antibodies cardiovascular symptoms. Skin tests were positive in 75% of the carboplatin group, and only 16.7% in docetaxel. There was a rapid drug desensitization success rate of 99.4% and 85.7% did not present any related hypersensitivity reaction.
Conclusion
The diagnosis of hypersensitivity reaction to anticancer chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies offers a panorama in the management of oncological diseases. Our standardized desensitization protocol is safe and effective and can be reproduced in other centers to treat patients who need to maintain first-line treatment.
Background
In recent years, a new type of immediate hypersensitivity reaction known as cytokine release began to emerge, and within this phenotype of reactions, interleukin-6 is the most frequently ...associated with the presence during drug administration. Chemotherapeutic agents (QT) and monoclonal antibodies.
Objective
Determine interleukin-6 levels in hypersensitivity reactions to QT and monoclonal antibodies.
Methods
Observational and prospective study that was carried out from March 1, 2021 to March 1, 2022 in a university hospital in northeastern Mexico. Symptoms, severity, interleukin-6 levels, and skin tests of hypersensitivity reaction were evaluated at QT and monoclonal antibodies.
Results
A total of 41 patients with oncological disease were included, the most frequent being ovarian cancer. Symptoms as initial hypersensitivity reaction were neuromuscular in taxanes and cutaneous in Platinums. 41.5% presented elevation of interleukin-6, and it was found more frequently in presence of metastases. Positive skin tests were found more frequently in the carboplatin and doxorubicin groups. The most frequently presented phenotype was type I in paclitaxel, carboplatin, and doxorubicin, and mixed-reaction (type I and cytokine release) in oxaliplatin.
Conclusion
With the increasing prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions to biologic and antineoplastic therapies, interleukin-6 should be recognized as a biomarker in immediate hypersensitivity reactions to QT and monoclonal antibodies.
Background
Taxanes adjuvant therapy is recommended in certain high risk or metastatic tumors, particularly in lung and breast cancer, but also in other types of cancer like ovarian. The incidence of ...severe adverse drug reactions to paclitaxel is of approximately 10%.
Objectives
Analyze type I hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel and their management in the Mexican population.
Method
It is a retrospective, observational and descriptive study that included type I hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel reported from our database. Symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel were classified and skin testing was performed with a 6 mg/mL paclitaxel concentration. The desensitization procedure consisted of a 12-steps, 3-bags of 250 mL protocol with a 6–7-hour duration.
Results
A total of 60 desensitization procedures were performed and were all completed successfully. All participants in our group were female, their median age was 44.5 years.
All of our patients had hypersensitivity adverse drug reaction to paclitaxel during their first exposure and within the first 10 minutes of infusion. 63.6% of the patients had a moderate hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel and 36.4% had a severe reaction.
Conclusions
Paclitaxel continues to be a common use drug and has a high rate of adverse drug reactions. This is the first study of hypersensitivity to paclitaxel in a Mexican population.
Introduction
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD30 antigen. It is indicated for the treatment of CD30 + lymphomas and classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), including advanced ...(stage III-IV) untreated disease, relapsed/refractory disease, and consolidation after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In clinical trials the incidence of a hypersensitivity reaction is 1.2%.
Cases report
We present 3 cases of patients with refractory HL and anaphylaxis to the administration of BV (
Table 1). Symptoms are analyzed using a grading system described by Brown (2004) and a desensitization protocol was performed with a total dose of 100 mg of BV in 4 solution bags with an initial concentration of 1:1000 of total dose for cases of severe anaphylaxis, and desensitization of 3 solution bags with baseline concentration of 1: 100 for cases of moderate anaphylaxis.
Management & Outcome
Intradermal skin tests were positive. Before desensitization, premedication with methylprednisolone and chlorphenamine was administered, as well as fluid therapy with 0.9% physiological solution at 100 cc/hour at induction stage, 250 cc/hour at maintenance stage, and increased to 500 cc/hour in case of hypersensitivity reaction.
Discussion
Drug desensitization in 12 or 16 steps allows tolerable administration of brentuximab vedotin after moderate to severe anaphylaxis. The favorable response to treatment of these patients may indicate that desensitization is a viable strategy for patients with relapsed or refractory HL.
Introduction
High-grade serous primary peritoneal cancer is highly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy with response rates above 80%. Incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to ...carboplatin is estimated to be between 15% and 20%, usually seen after a mean of 6–8 infusions, with patients developing moderate to severe reactions.
Case report
A 62-year-old female patient with stage IIIC primary high-grade serous carcinoma of the peritoneum was diagnosed and chemotherapy with carboplatin and Paclitaxel was indicated by the oncology service and patient shows response. At 6 months the patient returns, a new PET/CT reports progression of the disease. Carboplatin/paclitaxel cycles are restarted and in the eight cycle of carboplatin within 40 min of administration, she presented severe anaphylaxis with skin, pulmonary, cardiac and atypical symptoms. Infusion is suspended and intramuscular epinephrine with hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine are administered resolving symptoms.
Management and outcome
Intradermal skin test with carboplatin at the concentration of 10 mg / ml (dilution 1: 100) was positive. Due to the symptoms presented and to continue the safe reintroduction to carboplatin, a 4 bag 16-step drug desensitization protocol was carried out at a total dose of 620 mg with no hypersensitivity reactions.
Discussion
Prolonged carboplatin use is associated with an increased incidence of carboplatin-related hypersensitivity reactions. And in patients that present hypersensitivity reactions, a safe and effective carboplatin desensitization protocol can be carried out to reach the administration of a full dose. Desensitization protocol induces tolerance to a drug temporarily and is dependent on continuous exposure.
Introduction
Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to rituximab occur during the first infusion in 29% to 40% of patients. Commonly, these hypersensitivity reactions are the result of a release of ...cytokines, although IgE mediated reactions have also been reported.
Case Report
A 7-year-old female patient with diagnosis of CD-20 positive acute lymphoblastic B-cell leukemia was included in a pilot study that consisted of two doses of rituximab treatment in the induction to remission phase by the pediatric hematology service; 30 minutes after the first administration of 300 mg of rituximab the patient started with generalized rash, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, dyspnea, foreign body sensation in throat, oxygen desaturation until 89% and hypotension; therefore, the infusion of rituximab was suspended, and intramuscular epinephrine was administered as well as intravenous hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine and supplemental oxygen supply with adequate resolution of symptoms.
Management & Outcome
Intradermal skin testing with rituximab at the concentration 1 mg/ml (dilution 1:10), was positive. Desensitization to rituximab was indicated by our service with 4 bags – 16 steps protocol with an initial concentration dose of 1/1,000 of the total dose. The patient was premedicated 1 hour prior with intravenous chlorphenamine, methylprednisolone and ondansetron. Intravenous prophylactic fluids with normal saline solution were administered during the infusion. The procedure was carried out with close monitoring of vital signs in a course of 6.67 hours, without presenting hypersensitivity reactions.
Discussion
HSR to rituximab may be induced by the activation of mast cells and basophils. Desensitization protocols are developed when there is no alternative drug for the underlying condition.
Background
Paclitaxel is a chemotherapeutic agent used in the treatment of multiple types of malignant tumors which was discovered from the Taxus brevofilia tree. In some patients, anaphylaxis ...develops during the first exposure to paclitaxel, suggesting that primary sensitization may have occurred through hidden or unidentified allergens that produce cross-reactivity. Skin testing may be useful in identifying sensitization to these allergens. Atopy has also been reported in patients with hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to paclitaxel.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between atopy and sensitization to allergens with the development of immediate HSR to paclitaxel.
Methods
Skin prick tests (SPT) for environmental and food allergens were applied to 76 patients recently diagnosed with cancer. A SPT to paclitaxel was applied and if negative, an intradermal test was performed. After paclitaxel's infusion, the development of immediate HSR was observed.
Results
Of 76 skin tests, 43% of patients had allergen sensitization and 57% did not. HSR occurred in 12.1% and 11.6% of each group, respectively. Five percent of patients tested positive to paclitaxel and only one had an immediate HSR. Eighty-nine percent of patients who developed an HSR had a family or personal history of atopy.
Conclusions
Sensitization to environmental or food allergens does not appear to be a risk factor for the development of immediate HSR to paclitaxel, suggesting that there are other non-IgE-mediated immunologic mechanisms responsible for their development, however, a personal and family history of atopy increases 8x the risk of developing anaphylaxis.
PDF
