Purpose
Osimertinib (AZD9291) 80 mg once daily is approved by the US FDA for the treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC whose disease has previously progressed on EGFR-TKI ...therapy. Osimertinib PK was evaluated to define the dose and dosing interval, whether a fixed-dosing approach can be used globally, and the impact of formulation and food on exposure.
Methods
AURA (NCT01802632): single- and multiple-dose PK of osimertinib (20–240 mg daily) was determined in patients with advanced NSCLC. Bioavailability study (NCT01951599): single-dose PK of osimertinib (20 mg) was determined in healthy volunteers with administration of capsule, solution, or tablet formulations fasted, and as a tablet in the fed and fasted state.
Results
Osimertinib was slowly absorbed and displayed dose-proportional increases in exposure from 20 to 240 mg. Distribution was extensive and clearance low to moderate, resulting in a mean half-life of 48.3 h. Steady state was achieved by 15 days of dosing, consistent with single-dose PK, with a peak-to-trough ratio of 1.6. Two active metabolites circulated at ~10 % of osimertinib exposure. Ethnicity did not appear to affect exposure. Osimertinib PK profiles in healthy volunteers were similar to those in patients and were unaffected by formulation. Food caused a clinically insignificant increase in exposure.
Conclusions
Osimertinib PK supports once-daily dosing; the same dose for Asian and non-Asian populations; a fixed-dosing approach; a minimal effect of food on exposure; and a switch to tablet formulation without alteration to dose or schedule. Osimertinib plasma concentrations are sustained throughout the dosing period, which is considered optimal for efficacy.
Osimertinib is a potent, highly selective, irreversible inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and T790M resistance mutation. In vitro metabolism data suggested osimertinib is a ...substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4/5, a weak inducer of CYP3A, and an inhibitor of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). A combination of in vitro data, clinical pharmacokinetic data, and drug‐drug interaction (DDI) data of osimertinib in oncology patients were used to develop the physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and verify the DDI data of osimertinib. The model predicted the observed monotherapy concentration profile of osimertinib within 1.1‐fold, and showed good predictability (within 1.7‐fold) to the observed peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) DDI ratio changes, when co‐administered with rifampicin, itraconazole, and simvastatin, but not with rosuvastatin. Based on observed clinical data and PBPK simulations, the recommended dose of osimertinib when dosed with strong CYP3A inducers is 160 mg once daily. PBPK modeling suggested no dose adjustment with moderate and weak CYP3A inducers.
Aims
We investigated the effects of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor (itraconazole) or inducer (rifampicin) on the pharmacokinetics of the epidermal growth factor receptor‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor ...osimertinib, in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer in two Phase I, open‐label, two‐part clinical studies. Part one of both studies is reported.
Methods
In the itraconazole study (NCT02157883), patients received single‐dose osimertinib 80 mg on Days 1 and 10 and itraconazole (200 mg twice daily) on Days 6–18 orally. In the rifampicin study (NCT02197247), patients received osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 1–77 and rifampicin 600 mg once daily on Days 29–49.
Results
In the itraconazole study (n = 36), the geometric least squares mean (GMLSM) ratios (osimertinib plus itraconazole/osimertinib alone) for Cmax and AUC were 80% (90% CI 73, 87) and 124% (90% CI 115, 135), respectively, below the predefined no‐effect upper limit of 200%. In the rifampicin study (n = 40), the GMLSM ratios (osimertinib plus rifampicin/osimertinib alone) for Css,max and AUCτ were 27% (90% CI 24, 30) and 22% (90% CI 20, 24), respectively, below the predefined no‐effect lower limit of 50%. The induction effect of rifampicin was apparent within 7 days of initiation; osimertinib Css,max and AUCτ values returned to pre‐rifampicin levels within 3 weeks of rifampicin discontinuation. No new osimertinib safety findings were observed.
Conclusions
Osimertinib can be co‐administered with CYP3A4 inhibitors, but strong CYP3A inducers should be avoided if possible.
Induction of cytochrome P450 (P450) can impact the efficacy and safety of drug molecules upon multiple dosing with coadministered drugs. This strategy is focused on CYP3A since the majority of ...clinically relevant cases of P450 induction are related to these enzymes. However, the in vitro evaluation of induction is applicable to other P450 enzymes; however, the in vivo relevance cannot be assessed because the scarcity of relevant clinical data. In the preclinical phase, compounds are screened using pregnane X receptor reporter gene assay, and if necessary structure-activity relationships (SAR) are developed. When projects progress toward the clinical phase, induction studies in a hepatocyte-derived model using HepaRG cells will generate enough robust data to assess the compound's induction liability in vivo. The sensitive CYP3A biomarker 4β-hydroxycholesterol is built into the early clinical phase I studies for all candidates since rare cases of in vivo induction have been found without any induction alerts from the currently used in vitro methods. Using this model, the AstraZeneca induction strategy integrates in vitro assays and in vivo studies to make a comprehensive assessment of the induction potential of new chemical entities. Convincing data that support the validity of both the in vitro models and the use of the biomarker can be found in the scientific literature. However, regulatory authorities recommend the use of primary human hepatocytes and do not advise the use of sensitive biomarkers. Therefore, primary human hepatocytes and midazolam studies will be conducted during the clinical program as required for regulatory submission.
Purpose
Selumetinib (ARRY-142886) is a potent, selective, MEK1/2 inhibitor approved in the US for the treatment of children (≥ 2 years) with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and symptomatic, inoperable ...plexiform neurofibromas (PN). We characterized population pharmacokinetics (PK) of selumetinib and its active
N‐
desmethyl metabolite, evaluated exposure–safety/efficacy relationships, and assessed the proposed therapeutic dose of 25 mg/m
2
bid based on body surface area (BSA) in this patient population.
Methods
Population PK modeling and covariate analysis (demographics, formulation, liver enzymes, BSA, patients/healthy volunteers) were based on pooled PK data from adult healthy volunteers (
n
= 391), adult oncology patients (
n
= 83) and pediatric patients with NF1-PN (
n
= 68). Longitudinal selumetinib/metabolite exposures were predicted with the final model. Exposure–safety/efficacy analyses were applied to pediatric patients (dose levels: 20, 25, 30 mg/m
2
bid).
Results
Selumetinib and metabolite concentration–time courses were modeled using a joint compartmental model. Typical selumetinib plasma clearance was 11.6 L/h (95% CI 11.0–12.2 L/ h). Only BSA had a clinically relevant (> 20%) impact on exposure, supporting BSA-based administration in children. Selumetinib and metabolite exposures in responders (≥ 20% PN volume decrease from baseline) and non-responders were largely overlapping, with medians numerically higher in responders. No clear relationships between exposure and safety events were established; exposure was not associated with key adverse events (AEs) including rash acneiform, diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea.
Conclusion
Findings support continuous selumetinib 25 mg/m
2
bid in pediatric patients. Importantly, the updated dosing nomogram ensures that patients will receive a clinically active, yet tolerable, dose regardless of differences in BSA and allows dose reductions, if necessary.
Purpose
Limited information is available regarding the drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential of molecular targeted agents and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin (hydroxydaunorubicin), ...vincristine (Oncovin), and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy. The addition of the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor ibrutinib to R-CHOP therapy results in increased toxicity versus R-CHOP alone, including higher incidence of peripheral neuropathy. Vincristine is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1); drugs that inhibit P-gp could potentially cause increased toxicity when co-administered with vincristine through DDI. While the combination of the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib and R-CHOP is being explored clinically, the DDI potential between these therapies is unknown.
Methods
A human mechanistic physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of vincristine following intravenous dosing was developed to predict potential DDI interactions with combination therapy. In vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion and in vivo clinical PK parameters informed PBPK model development, which was verified by comparing simulated vincristine concentrations with observed clinical data.
Results
While simulations suggested no DDI between vincristine and ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in plasma, simulated vincristine exposure in muscle tissue was increased in the presence of ibrutinib but not acalabrutinib. Extrapolation of the vincristine mechanistic PBPK model to other P-gp substrates further suggested DDI risk when ibrutinib (area under the concentration–time curve AUC ratio: 1.8), but not acalabrutinib (AUC ratio: 0.92), was given orally with venetoclax or digoxin.
Conclusion
Overall, these data suggest low DDI risk between acalabrutinib and P-gp substrates with negligible increase in the potential risk of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy when acalabrutinib is added to R-CHOP therapy.
Aim
We report on two Phase 1, open‐label, single‐arm studies assessing the effect of osimertinib on simvastatin (CYP3A substrate) and rosuvastatin (breast cancer resistance protein substrate BCRP ...substrate) exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer who have progressed after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to determine, upon coadministration, whether osimertinib could affect the exposure of these agents.
Methods
Fifty‐two patients in the CYP3A study (pharmacokinetic PK analysis, n = 49), and 44 patients in the BCRP study were dosed (PK analysis, n = 44). In the CYP3A study, patients received single doses of simvastatin 40 mg on Days 1 and 31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 3–32. In the BCRP study, single doses of rosuvastatin 20 mg were given on Days 1 and 32, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on Days 4–34.
Results
Geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratios (90% confidence intervals) of simvastatin plus osimertinib for area under the plasma concentration–time curves from zero to infinity (AUC) were 91% (77–108): entirely contained within the predefined no relevant effect limits, and Cmax of 77% (63, 94) which was not contained within the limits. GLSM ratios of rosuvastatin plus osimertinib for AUC were 135% (115–157) and Cmax were 172 (146, 203): outside the no relevant effect limits.
Conclusions
Osimertinib is unlikely to have any clinically relevant interaction with CYP3A substrates and has a weak inhibitory effect on BCRP. No new safety concerns were identified in either study.
Osimertinib is a third-generation, central nervous system-active, epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) selective for EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance ...mutations. This phase 1, open-label study (NCT02491944) investigated absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral and intravenous (IV) osimertinib. Ten healthy subjects (21-61 years) received a single oral 80-mg dose concomitantly with a 100 μg (containing 1 μCi) IV microtracer dose of
Cosimertinib. Oral and IV PK were determined simultaneously for osimertinib and its active metabolites, AZ5104 and AZ7550. High-performance liquid chromatography and accelerator mass spectrometry were used to characterize IV dose PK. Geometric mean absolute oral bioavailability of osimertinib was 69.8% (90% confidence interval, 66.7, 72.9). Oral osimertinib was slowly absorbed (median time to maximum plasma concentration t
7.0 hours). Following t
, plasma concentrations fell in an apparent monophasic manner. IV clearance and volume of distribution were 16.8 L/h and 1285 L, respectively. Arithmetic mean elimination half-life estimates were 59.7, 52.6, and 72.6 hours for osimertinib, AZ5104, and AZ7550, respectively (oral dosing), and 54.9, 68.4, and 99.7 hours for
Cosimertinib,
CAZ5104, and
CAZ7550, respectively (IV dosing). Oral osimertinib was well absorbed. Simultaneous IV and oral PK analysis proved useful for complete understanding of osimertinib PK and showed that the first-pass effect was minimal for osimertinib.
Acalabrutinib, a selective, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a CYP3A substrate and weak CYP3A/CYP2C8 inhibitor. A physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for ...acalabrutinib and its active metabolite ACP‐5862 to predict potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs). The model indicated acalabrutinib would not perpetrate a CYP2C8 or CYP3A DDI with the sensitive CYP substrates rosiglitazone or midazolam, respectively. The model reasonably predicted clinically observed acalabrutinib DDI with the CYP3A perpetrators itraconazole (4.80‐fold vs. 5.21‐fold observed) and rifampicin (0.21‐fold vs. 0.23‐fold observed). An increase of two to threefold acalabrutinib area under the curve was predicted for coadministration with moderate CYP3A inhibitors. When both the parent drug and active metabolite (total active components) were considered, the magnitude of the CYP3A DDI was much less significant. PBPK dosing recommendations for DDIs should consider the magnitude of the parent drug excursion, relative to safe parent drug exposures, along with the excursion of total active components to best enable safe and adequate pharmacodynamic coverage.
Metabotropic glutamate receptor 7 (mGluR7) remains the most elusive of the eight known mGluRs primarily because of the limited availability of tool compounds to interrogate its potential therapeutic ...utility. The discovery of N,N'-dibenzhydrylethane-1,2-diamine dihydrochloride (AMN082) as the first orally active, brain-penetrable, mGluR7-selective allosteric agonist by Mitsukawa and colleagues (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:18712-18717, 2005) provides a means to investigate this receptor system directly. AMN082 demonstrates mGluR7 agonist activity in vitro and interestingly has a behavioral profile that supports utility across a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders including anxiety and depression. The present studies were conducted to extend the in vitro and in vivo characterization of AMN082 by evaluating its pharmacokinetic and metabolite profile. Profiling of AMN082 in rat liver microsomes revealed rapid metabolism (t(1/2) < 1 min) to a major metabolite, N-benzhydrylethane-1,2-diamine (Met-1). In vitro selectivity profiling of Met-1 demonstrated physiologically relevant transporter binding affinity at serotonin transporter (SERT), dopamine transporter (DAT), and norepinephrine transporter (NET) (323, 3020, and 3410 nM, respectively); whereas the parent compound AMN082 had appreciable affinity at NET (1385 nM). AMN082 produced antidepressant-like activity and receptor occupancy at SERT up to 4 h postdose, a time point at which AMN082 is significantly reduced in brain and plasma while the concentration of Met-1 continues to increase in brain. Acute Met-1 administration produced antidepressant-like activity as would be expected from its in vitro profile as a mixed SERT, NET, DAT inhibitor. Taken together, these data suggest that the reported in vivo actions of AMN082 should be interpreted with caution, because they may involve other mechanisms in addition to mGluR7.
PDF
