Summary
Rituximab monotherapy has proven efficacy in treatment‐naïve, asymptomatic advanced‐stage follicular lymphoma (FL). Ofatumumab is a fully humanized anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody with ...increased CD20 affinity and complement‐dependent cytotoxicity. This phase 2 trial (NCT01190449) evaluated ofatumumab in patients with untreated, low/intermediate‐risk FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), advanced‐stage FL to determine single‐agent efficacy. Patients with measurable disease in stages III/IV or bulky stage II, regardless of Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires criteria, received 4 weekly 1000 mg doses followed by four extended induction doses once every 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) to 1000 mg; secondary endpoints were progression‐free survival (PFS) and safety. Fifty‐one patients were enrolled. Fifteen patients were randomized to 500 mg prior to discontinuing that arm for slow accrual. Among 36 patients on the 1000 mg arm, ORR was 84%, median PFS was 1·9 years and median response duration was 23·7 months. All patients remain alive. No grade 4 infusion reactions or grade 3/4 infections occurred. Grade 3 infusion reactions occurred in 25% in the 1000 mg arm only (all first infusion); all but two patients continued on study. Discontinuation was 6% for the total study population. Ofatumumab monotherapy administered by extended induction in untreated, low/intermediate‐risk FLIPI, advanced‐stage FL is well tolerated and active. Activity appears similar to that reported with single‐agent rituximab.
New therapies are needed for patients with relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who do not benefit from or are ineligible for stem cell transplant and chimeric antigen ...receptor therapy. The CD30-targeted, antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the immunomodulator lenalidomide (Len) have demonstrated promising activity as single agents in this population. We report the results of a phase 1/dose expansion trial evaluating the combination of BV/Len in rel/ref DLBCL. Thirty-seven patients received BV every 21 days, with Len administered continuously for a maximum of 16 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose of the combination was 1.2 mg/kg BV with 20 mg/d Len. BV/Len was well tolerated with a toxicity profile consistent with their use as single agents. Most patients required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support because of neutropenia. The overall response rate was 57% (95% CI, 39.6-72.5), complete response rate, 35% (95% CI, 20.7-52.6); median duration of response, 13.1 months; median progression-free survival, 10.2 months (95% CI, 5.5-13.7); and median overall survival, 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-35.6). Response rates were highest in patients with CD30+ DLBCL (73%), but they did not differ according to cell of origin (P = .96). NK cell expansion and phenotypic changes in CD8+ T-cell subsets in nonresponders were identified by mass cytometry. BV/Len represents a potential treatment option for patients with rel/ref DLBCL. This combination is being further explored in a phase 3 study (registered on https://clinicaltrials.org as NCT04404283). This trial was registered on https://clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02086604.
Abstract
High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX), defined by doses of methotrexate (MTX) ≥ 1 g/m2, is a widely used regimen known to cause renal toxicity. The reported incidence of renal toxicity in patients ...with osteosarcoma is 1.8%, but the incidence in hematologic malignancies is not well characterized. In this retrospective study of 649 cycles of HDMTX in 194 patients, renal toxicity occurred in 9.1% of cycles in patients with lymphoma compared to 1.5% in patients with sarcoma. Older age, male sex, decreased baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) and increased proton pump inhibitor use among the lymphoma population likely contributed to the observed difference. The incidence of renal toxicity was independent of the incidence of delayed MTX elimination, suggesting that kidney function is only one factor involved in MTX clearance. Renal toxicity prolonged the duration of hospitalization but severe renal insufficiency was uncommon. No significant impact on progression-free or overall survival was observed.
This phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) in patients with indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) refractory to rituximab alone, rituximab plus ...chemotherapy or anti‐CD20 radioimmunotherapy. Patients received InO 1·8 mg/m2 intravenously on a 28‐d cycle for a planned 4–8 cycles. The initial InO dose and schedule could be adjusted for tolerability and patients were allowed to receive 2 additional cycles (up to 8 total) after achieving a complete response (CR). The primary endpoint was overall response. Eighty‐one patients were enrolled, among whom 48 (59%) received ≥3 InO cycles and 13 (16%) completed the treatment phase. The overall response rate was 67% (CR, 31%). Median (95% confidence interval) progression‐free survival was 12·7 (8·9–26·9) months; median overall survival was not reached. Haematological adverse events (AEs) were common, particularly thrombocytopenia (74%) and neutropenia (56%). These were also the most common AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (37% and 11%, respectively); 58% of patients reported AEs leading to treatment discontinuation. InO demonstrated robust activity in these heavily pretreated patients, although treatment duration was limited by haematological toxicities. Additional studies may determine dosing regimens that allow for reduced toxicity.
Idelalisib is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase δ inhibitor approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma, a type of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ...Idelalisib-triggered adverse events (AEs) may be managed with treatment interruption and/or dose reduction, potentially extending therapy duration and increasing the likelihood of continued response.
Post hoc analyses were conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes after AE-induced idelalisib interruption for 125 patients with iNHL and 283 with CLL.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer for patients with iNHL who experienced ≥ 2 interruptions versus those with 0 interruptions who discontinued idelalisib or study because of AEs (hazard ratio 0.33; P = .0212). Both PFS and overall survival were longer for patients with CLL with ≥ 2 interruptions versus 0 interruptions in those who discontinued therapy because of an AE (hazard ratio PFS 0.50, overall survival 0.41; P < .005). Clinical benefits persisted for patients with CLL who experienced treatment interruption after receiving idelalisib for ≥ 6 months. Supplementing interruption with dose reduction did not worsen clinical outcomes. However, time off therapy of ≥ 8% may diminish the clinical benefit of treatment interruption.
Idelalisib interruption and dose reduction were associated with enhanced clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory iNHL or CLL who experienced an AE, supporting this management strategy when indicated.
•Idelalisib is approved for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.•Idelalisib interruption for adverse events (AEs) correlated with longer therapy duration and improved progression-free survival and overall survival.•Idelalisib dose reduction for AE management did not negatively impact clinical outcomes.•Idelalisib interruption and/or reduced dose are feasible means to manage AEs and optimize clinical benefit.
Post hoc analyses evaluating clinical outcomes after treatment interruption or dose reduction were used to manage adverse events in patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with idelalisib. Idelalisib interruption with or without dose reduction was associated with enhanced clinical outcome, including longer progression-free survival and overall survival. These data support toxicity management strategies when indicated.
Idelalisib, a selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ, is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in combination with rituximab. We aimed to assess the efficacy ...and safety of idelalisib in combination with a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, ofatumumab, in a similar patient population.
In this global, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed CLL progressing less than 24 months from last therapy. Patients refractory to ofatumumab were excluded. Patients were stratified by relapsed versus refractory disease, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, or both, and IGHV mutated versus unmutated. We randomised patients in a 2:1 ratio using a web-based interactive system that generated a unique treatment code, and assigned patients to receive either idelalisib plus ofatumumab (oral idelalisib 150 mg twice daily continuously plus ofatumumab 300 mg intravenously in week 1, then 1000 mg intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, and every 4 weeks for 16 weeks) or ofatumumab alone (ofatumumab dosing as per the combination group, except 2000 mg was substituted for the 1000 mg dose). An independent review committee assessed response, including progressive disease, based on imaging using modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 2008 criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. We did a primary analysis (data cutoff Jan 15, 2015) and an updated analysis (data cutoff Sept 1, 2015). This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01659021.
Between Dec 17, 2012, and March 31, 2014, we enrolled 261 patients (median age 68 years IQR 61-74, median previous therapies three IQR 2-4). At the primary analysis, median progression-free survival was 16·3 months (95% CI 13·6-17·8) in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and 8·0 months (5·7-8·2) in the ofatumumab group (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0·27, 95% CI 0·19-0·39, p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group were neutropenia (59 34% patients vs 14 16% in the ofatumumab group), diarrhoea (34 20% vs one 1%), and pneumonia (25 14% vs seven 8%). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the ofatumumab group were neutropenia (14 16%), pneumonia (seven 8%), and thrombocytopenia (six 7% vs 19 11% in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group). Serious infections were more common in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and included pneumonia (23 13% patients in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group vs nine 10% in the ofatumumab group), sepsis (11 6% vs one 1%), and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (eight 5% vs one 1%). 22 treatment-related deaths occurred in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group (the most common being sepsis, septic shock, viral sepsis, and pneumonia). Six treatment-related deaths occurred in the ofatumumab group (the most common being progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and pneumonia).
The idelalisib plus ofatumumab combination resulted in better progression-free survival compared with ofatumumab alone in patients with relapsed CLL, including in those with high-risk disease, and thus might represent a new treatment alternative for this patient population.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Idelalisib is associated with increased occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Clinical observations suggest a correlation between immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced irAEs and survival ...outcomes in patients with solid tumors; however, this relationship in hematologic malignancies is not well understood. In a post hoc analysis of 3 registrational trials, we explored the relationship between Grade ≥3 diarrhea/colitis and alanine/aspartate transaminase (ALT/AST) elevation incidences and efficacy endpoints in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with idelalisib. Grade ≥3 diarrhea/colitis was associated with higher overall response rate (ORR) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) for all subgroups. Grade ≥3 ALT/AST elevations were associated with improved duration of response and overall survival for all subgroups and improved ORR and PFS for patients with FL or iNHL. Our analysis in hematologic malignancies showed a trend correlating idelalisib-induced Grade ≥3 irAEs with improved efficacy.
Lenalidomide combined with rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) (R2CHOP) in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has shown promising activity, ...particularly in the activated B-cell-like (ABC) subtype. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)-ACRIN trial E1412 was a randomized phase II study comparing R2CHOP versus R-CHOP in untreated DLBCL.
Patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, stage II bulky-IV disease, International Prognostic Index (IPI) ≥ 2, and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 were eligible and randomly assigned 1:1 to R2CHOP versus R-CHOP for six cycles. Tumors were analyzed using the NanoString Lymph2Cx for cell of origin. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in all patients with the co-primary end point of PFS in ABC-DLBCL. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, and overall survival (OS).
Three hundred forty-nine patients were enrolled; 280 patients (145 R2CHOP and 135 R-CHOP) were evaluable: 94 were ABC-DLBCL, 122 germinal center B-cell-like-DLBCL, 18 unclassifiable, and 46 unknowns. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between arms, and the median age was 66 (range, 24-92); 70% of patients had stage IV disease; 34%, 43%, and 24% had IPI 2, 3, and 4 or 5, respectively. Myelosuppression was more common in the R2CHOP arm. The ORR and CR rate were 92% and 68% in R-CHOP and 97% (
= .06) and 73% (
= .43) in the R2CHOP arm, respectively. The median follow-up was 3.0 years; R2CHOP was associated with a 34% reduction in risk of progression or death versus R-CHOP (hazard ratio HR, 0.66 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.01) and 3-year PFS of 73% versus 61%, one-sided
= .03, and an improvement in OS (83% and 75% at 3 years; HR, 0.67; one-sided
= .05). The PFS HR for R2CHOP was 0.67 for ABC-DLBCL, one-sided
= .1.
In this signal-seeking study, the addition of lenalidomide to R-CHOP (R2CHOP) improved outcomes in newly diagnosed DLBCL including patients with ABC-DLBCL.
PDF
