Nearly 20% of the budding yeast genome is transcribed periodically during the cell division cycle. The precise temporal execution of this large transcriptional program is controlled by a large ...interacting network of transcriptional regulators, kinases, and ubiquitin ligases. Historically, this network has been viewed as a collection of four coregulated gene clusters that are associated with each phase of the cell cycle. Although the broad outlines of these gene clusters were described nearly 20 years ago, new technologies have enabled major advances in our understanding of the genes comprising those clusters, their regulation, and the complex regulatory interplay between clusters. More recently, advances are being made in understanding the roles of chromatin in the control of the transcriptional program. We are also beginning to discover important regulatory interactions between the cell-cycle transcriptional program and other cell-cycle regulatory mechanisms such as checkpoints and metabolic networks. Here we review recent advances and contemporary models of the transcriptional network and consider these models in the context of eukaryotic cell-cycle controls.
G1-specific transcriptional activation by Cln3/CDK initiates the budding yeast cell cycle. To identify targets of Cln3/CDK, we analyzed the SBF and MBF transcription factor complexes by ...multidimensional protein interaction technology (MudPIT). Whi5 was identified as a stably bound component of SBF but not MBF. Inactivation of Whi5 leads to premature expression of G1-specific genes and budding, whereas overexpression retards those processes. Whi5 inactivation bypasses the requirement for Cln3 both for transcriptional activation and cell cycle initiation. Whi5 associates with G1-specific promoters via SBF during early G1 phase, then dissociates coincident with transcriptional activation. Dissociation of Whi5 is promoted by Cln3 in vivo. Cln/CDK phosphorylation of Whi5 in vitro promotes its dissociation from SBF complexes. Mutation of putative CDK phosphorylation sites, at least five of which are phosphorylated in vivo, strongly reduces SBF-dependent transcription and delays cell cycle initiation. Like mammalian Rb, Whi5 is a G1-specific transcriptional repressor antagonized by CDK.
G1-specific transcription in yeast depends upon SBF and MBF. We have identified Nrm1 (negative regulator of MBF targets 1), as a stable component of MBF. NRM1 (YNR009w), an MBF-regulated gene ...expressed during late G1 phase, associates with G1-specific promoters via MBF. Transcriptional repression upon exit from G1 phase requires both Nrm1 and MBF. Inactivation of Nrm1 results in prolonged expression of MBF-regulated transcripts and leads to hydroxyurea (HU) resistance and enhanced bypass of rad53Δ- and mec1Δ-associated lethality. Constitutive expression of a stabilized form of Nrm1 represses MBF targets and leads to HU sensitivity. The fission yeast homolog SpNrm1, encoded by the MBF target gene nrm1+ (SPBC16A3.07c), binds to MBF target genes and acts as a corepressor. In both yeasts, MBF represses G1-specific transcription outside of G1 phase. A negative feedback loop involving Nrm1 bound to MBF leads to transcriptional repression as cells exit G1 phase.
In budding yeast, HXT genes encoding hexose permeases are induced by glucose via a mechanism in which the F box protein Grr1 antagonizes activity of the transcriptional repressor Rgt1. Neither the ...mechanism of Rgt1 inactivation nor the role of Grr1 in that process has been understood. We show that glucose promotes phosphorylation of Rgt1 and its dissociation from HXT gene promoters. This cascade of events is dependent upon the F-box protein Grr1. Inactivation of Rgt1 is sufficient to explain the requirement for Grr1 but does not involve Rgt1 proteolysis or ubiquitination. We show that inactivation of Mth1 and Std1, known negative regulators of HXT gene expression, leads to the hyperphosphorylation of Rgt1 and its dissociation from HXT promoters even in the absence of glucose. Furthermore, inactivation of Mth1 and Std1 bypasses the requirement for Grr1 for induction of these events, suggesting they are targets for inactivation by Grr1. Consistent with that proposal, Mth1 is rapidly eliminated in response to glucose via a mechanism that requires Grr1. Based upon these data, we propose that glucose acts via Grr1 to promote the degradation of Mth1. Degradation of Mth1 leads to phosphorylation and dissociation of Rgt1 from HXT promoters, thereby activating HXT gene expression.
The DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints are required for the efficient response to genotoxic stress, which is critical for genome stability and cell survival. The DNA replication and damage ...checkpoints delay progression into mitosis, and at the same time induce the transcription of genes that promote repair of cellular lesions including stabilization of stalled replication forks and induction of DNA repair functions. The elucidation of the mechanism by which the DNA replication checkpoint activates transcription of G1/S genes is provided by our recent study reported in the August issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. We show that, in response to stimulation of the DNA replication checkpoint, activation of G1-S transcription is established by inactivation, via phosphorylation by the checkpoint protein kinases, of the MBF-associated transcriptional corepressor Nrm1. This regulation is critical for the survival of cells responding to genotoxic stress. This provides a simple but elegant mechanism by which checkpoint activation can override the regular periodic transcriptional program by directly regulating a cell cycle dependent transcriptional repressor. We discuss the likely conservation of this regulatory pathway in yeast and man.
PDF
