Summary Background Afatinib—an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker—improves progression-free survival compared with pemetrexed and cisplatin for first-line treatment of patients with EGFR ...mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We compared afatinib with gemcitabine and cisplatin—a chemotherapy regimen widely used in Asia—for first-line treatment of Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Methods This open-label, randomised phase 3 trial was done at 36 centres in China, Thailand, and South Korea. After central testing for EGFR mutations, treatment-naive patients (stage IIIB or IV cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer version 6, performance status 0–1) were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive either oral afatinib (40 mg per day) or intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-week schedule for up to six cycles. Randomisation was done centrally with a random number-generating system and an interactive internet and voice-response system. Randomisation was stratified by EGFR mutation (Leu858Arg, exon 19 deletions, or other; block size three). Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment assignment, but the independent central imaging review group were. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxic effects, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent central review (intention-to-treat population). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01121393. Findings 910 patients were screened and 364 were randomly assigned (242 to afatinib, 122 to gemcitabine and cisplatin). Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the afatinib group (11·0 months, 95% CI 9·7–13·7) than in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group (5·6 months, 5·1–6·7; hazard ratio 0·28, 95% CI 0·20–0·39; p<0·0001). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the afatinib group were rash or acne (35 14·6% of 239 patients), diarrhoea (13 5·4%), and stomatitis or mucositis (13 5·4%), compared with neutropenia (30 26·5% of 113 patients), vomiting (22 19·5%), and leucopenia (17 15·0%) in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group. Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 15 (6·3%) patients in the afatinib group and nine (8·0%) patients in the gemcitabine and cisplatin group. Interpretation First-line afatinib significantly improves progression-free survival with a tolerable and manageable safety profile in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced lung NSCLC. Afatinib should be considered as a first-line treatment option for this patient population. Funding Boehringer Ingelheim.
BRAF variants were reported to have resistant mechanisms to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Nevertheless, characteristics and subsequent treatment strategies of such ...patients remain unclear.
From October 2016 to May 2020, patients with advanced NSCLC for whom next-generation sequencing detected mutations of both BRAF and EGFR were retrospectively included. From June 2020 to January 2021, patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who acquired the BRAF V600E mutation after progression on osimertinib were prospectively enrolled to explore the efficacy and safety of EGFR plus BARF co-inhibition.
A total of 58 patients were retrospectively identified and five prospectively included. BRAF variants were acquired after a median time of 22.7 months from initial diagnosis. The frequency of variations in TP53, PIK3CA, RB1, MET, LRP1B, APC, CDKN2A, MYC, ERBB2, and SMAD4 was all more than 10%; these mutations affected the cell cycle/p53 pathway and the EGFR downstream and bypass pathways. The median progression-free survival was 5.0 months for patients on chemotherapy and 2.1 months for those on TKIs not targeting both of EGFR and BRAF (p = 0.019). The median PFS was 7.8 months in five patients who received EGFR plus BRAF co-inhibitory drugs. RAS signaling was activated on disease progression.
Variations in the EGFR downstream and bypass pathways were frequent in patients with dual mutations of EGFR and BRAF. The efficacies of TKIs not targeting both EGFR and BRAF were inferior to chemotherapy. EGFR plus BRAF co-inhibition improved efficacy. Such treatment strategies should be further explored.
Ultrasonography is the most widely used technique to diagnose echinococcosis; however, challenges in using this technique and the demand on medical resources, especially in low-income or remote ...areas, can delay diagnosis. We aimed to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model based on ultrasonography to identify echinococcosis and its types, especially alveolar echinococcosis.
This retrospective, large-scale, multicentre study used ultrasound images from patients assessed at 84 hospitals in China, obtained between Jan 1, 2002, and Dec 31, 2021. Patients with a diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis, or seven other types of focal liver lesions were included. We tested ResNet-50, ResNext-50, and VGG-16 as the backbone network architecture for a classification DCNN model and input the perinodular information from the ultrasound images. We trained and validated the DCNN model to diagnose and classify echinococcosis using still greyscale ultrasound images of focal liver lesions in four stages: differentiating between echinococcosis and other focal liver lesions (stage one); differentiating cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis, and other focal liver lesions (stage two); differentiating cystic echinococcosis, alveolar echinococcosis, benign other focal liver lesions, and malignant focal liver lesions (stage three); and differentiating between active and transitional cystic echinococcosis and inactive cystic echinococcosis (stage four). We then tested the algorithm on internal, external, and prospective test datasets. The performance of DCNN was also compared with that of 12 radiologists recruited between Jan 15, 2022, and Jan 28, 2022, from Qinghai, Xinjiang, Anhui, Henan, Xizang, and Beijing, China, with different levels of diagnostic experience for echinococcosis and other focal liver lesions in a subset of ultrasound data that were randomly chosen from the prospective test dataset. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03871140).
The study took place between Jan 1, 2002, and Dec 31, 2021. In total, to train and test the DCNN model, we used 9631 liver ultrasound images from 6784 patients (2819 41·7% female patients and 3943 58·3% male patients) from 87 Chinese hospitals. The DCNN model was trained with 6328 images, internally validated with 984 images, and tested with 2319 images. The ResNet-50 network architecture outperformed VGG-16 and ResNext-50 and was generalisable, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0·982 (95% CI 0·960–0·994), 0·984 (0·972–0·992), and 0·913 (0·886–0·935) in distinguishing echinococcosis from other focal liver lesions; 0·986 (0·966–0·996), 0·962 (0·946–0·975), and 0·900 (0·872–0·924) in distinguishing alveolar echinococcosis from cystic echinococcosis and other focal liver lesions; and 0·974 (0·818–1·000), 0·956 (0·875–0·991), and 0·944 (0·844–0·988) in distinguishing active and transitional cystic echinococcosis from inactive echinococcosis in the three test datasets. Specifically, in patients with the hepatitis B or hepatitis C virus, the model could distinguish alveolar echinococcosis from hepatocellular carcinoma with an AUC of 0·892 (0·812–0·946). In identifying echinococcosis, the model showed significantly better performance compared with senior radiologists from a high-endemicity area (AUC 0·942 0·904–0·967 vs 0·844 0·820–0·866; p=0·027) and improved the diagnostic ability of junior, attending, and senior radiologists before and after assistance with AI with comparison of AUCs of 0·743 (0·714–0·770) versus 0·850 (0·826–0·871); p<0·0001, 0·808 (0·782–0·832) versus 0·886 (0·864–0·905); p<0·0001, and 0·844 (0·820–0·866) versus 0·870 (0·847–0·890); p=0·092, respectively.
The DCNN model was shown to be accurate and robust, and could improve the ultrasound diagnostic ability of radiologists for echinococcosis and its types for highly endemic and remote regions.
National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key Research & Development Program of China.
For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
