Summary
The immunogenicity and safety of Pfizer‐BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients are unknown. We prospectively followed 152 HSCT ...recipients who were at least six months following transplantation and with no active acute graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD). Blood samples were taken 2–4 weeks after the second vaccination and analyzed for receptor‐binding domain (RBD) antibodies and neutralizing antibodies (NA). 272 immunocompetent healthcare workers served as controls. At a median of 28 days after the second vaccination, 118 patients (77·6%) developed RBD immunoglobulin G (IgG) with a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 2·61 95% CI (confidence interval), 2·16–3·16. In the control group 269/272 (98·9%) developed RBD IgG, with a GMT of 5·98 (95% CI 5·70–6·28), P < 0·0001. The GMT of NA in HSCT recipients and controls was 116·0 (95% CI 76·5–175·9), and 427·9 (95% CI 354·3–516·7) respectively (P < 0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that HSCT recipients with no chronic GVHD and no immunosuppressive therapy at the time of vaccination had significantly higher levels of NA following the second vaccination. Adverse events were minimal and were less common than in healthy controls. In conclusion; the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination is safe and effective in HSCT recipients, especially those who are immunosuppression‐free. A significant fraction developed protecting NA.
Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT2) is a therapeutic option for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) relapsing after a first ...transplant (HSCT1). However, patients allocated to HSCT2 may be a selected group with better prognosis and the added efficacy of HSCT2 is not well established. We retrospectively analyzed 407 consecutive patients with relapsed AML/MDS after HSCT1. Sixty-two patients had HSCT2 (15%) and 345 did not. The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of non-relapse mortality and relapse after HSCT2 were 26% (95% confidence interval 95% CI: 17-39%) and 50% (95% CI: 39-65%), respectively. The 5-year overall survival rates were 25% (95% CI: 14-36%) and 7% (95% CI: 4-10%) in the HSCT2 and no-HSCT2 groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified female gender (hazard ratio HR=0.31, P=0.001), short remission duration after HSCT1 (HR=2.31, P=0.05), acute graft-versus-host disease after HSCT1 (HR=2.27, P=0.035), HSCT2 from a haplo-identical donor (HR=13.4, P=0.001) or matched unrelated donor (HR=4.53, P=0.007) and relapse after HSCT1 in earlier years (HR=2.46, P=0.02) as factors predicting overall survival after HSCT2. Multivariate analysis of all patients including HSCT2 as a timedependent variable identified relapse within 6 months after HSCT1 (HR=2.32, P<0.001), acute graft-versus-host disease before relapse (HR=1.47, P=0.005), myeloablative conditioning in HSCT1 (HR=0.67, P=0.011), female gender (HR=0.71, P=0.007), relapse in earlier years (HR=1.33, P=0.031) and not having HSCT2 (HR=1.66, P=0.010) as predictive of overall survival after relapse. In conclusion, HSCT2 is associated with longer survival compared to non-transplant treatments and may be the preferred approach in a subset of patients with relapsed AML/MDS after HSCT1.
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a standard of care in newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Several studies before the introduction of novel therapies in MM, demonstrated a ...pegylated G-CSF to be successful in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Lipegfilgrastim is a novel long-acting G-CSF that is produced by the conjugation of a single 20-kDa polyethelene glycol to the natural O-glycosylation site of G-CSF. Twenty-four MM patients were included for PBSCs mobilization with a single SC injection of 6 mg lipegfilgrastim. PBSC collection was started when the CD34
+
count was > 10 × 10
6
cells/L. The target progenitor cells were 6 × 10
6
cells/kg. The median day of apheresis was + 3 (range 2–5) following lipegfilgrastim. Median peripheral blood CD34
+
count pre-mobilization was of 22.65 (range 3.36–105) × 10
6
cells/L. The median number of leukaphaeresis procedures was 2 (range 1–4). The median mobilized CD34
+
cells/kg were 8.26 (range 0.77–12.42). One patient failed to mobilize and two patients mobilized < 6 × 10
6
cells/kg. Toxicity was mild and transient. Twenty-three patients underwent ASCT following high dose melphalan. All patients engrafted. As lipegfilgrastim is administered only once, it is conceivable that it improves both compliance and quality-of-life (NCT02488382).
We present three patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma (NHL) who received anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells therapy after failure of several lines of chemotherapy ...that developed pseudo-progression. One-week clinical and radiological findings were consistent with tumor progression. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) at 1 month post CAR T cells administration was consistent with treatment response. The rapid tumor growth and subsequent resolution are suggestive of tumor pseudo-progression mediated secondary to infiltration and immune activation of CAR T cells. Overall, 56 adult patients with NHL were enrolled in a phase 1b/2 in house clinical study with CD19 CAR T cells. Out of them 22/56 patients progressed as per PET-CT the 1 month post CAR T cells. In 14 patients, signs of progression started 7-10 days after CAR T cells infusion. In 11/14 patients, it was true progression, while in 3 it was pseudo-progression. Additional studies are warranted to describe the extent of this phenomenon and evaluate correlation with the CAR T activity and long-term disease control.
The combination of hypomethylating agents and venetoclax has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), especially for patients previously deemed unfit for ...curative–intent treatment. Some of these patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT); yet, there are scarce data regarding transplantation outcomes. We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study, including patients with AML who underwent alloHCT in CR1 after frontline treatment with azacitidine plus venetoclax only (aza-ven group). We collected a historical control group of patients who achieved CR1 after first-line intensive chemotherapy only, followed by alloHCT (intensive group). Patients in the aza-ven group (
n
= 24) were transplanted between 2019 and 2021. Compared to the intensive group, patients in the aza-ven group were older (median age 71.7 vs. 58.4 years), had higher incidence of therapy-related AML and AML with antecedent hematologic disorder and had more often adverse cytogenetics. They had a higher percentage of allografts from matched-unrelated donors, and reduced intensity conditioning was more commonly used. The estimated 12 months non relapse mortality was 19.1% in the aza-ven group and 11.8% in the intensive group. The estimated 12 months relapse-free survival and overall survival were 58% and 63% in the aza-ven group and 54% and 70% in the intensive group, respectively. The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at 6 months and of chronic GVHD at 12 months were 58% and 40% in the aza-ven group and 62% and 42% in the intensive group, respectively. Analysis of the aza-ven group revealed that HCT-CI score and ELN risk category were predictive of RFS in both univariate analysis as well as multivariate analysis. Our data suggests that alloHCT for AML patients achieving first CR with aza-ven appears feasible, with short-term post-transplant outcomes similar to those expected after traditional intensive chemotherapy.
The activity of anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with Richter's transformation (RT) to aggressive large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is largely unknown. In a multicenter ...retrospective study, we report the safety and efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in patients with RT (n=30) compared to patients with aggressive B cell lymphoma (n=283) and patients with transformed indolent Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma (iNHL) (n=141) between April 2016 and January 2023. Two-thirds of patients received prior therapy for CLL before RT and 89% of them received B-cell receptor and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitors. Toxicities of CAR T cell therapy in RT were similar to other lymphomas, with no fatalities related to cytokine release syndrome or immune effector-cell associated neurotoxicity synderome. The 100-day overall response rate and complete response rates in patients with RT were 57% and 47%, respectively. With a median follow up of 19 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months in patients with RT compared to 18 months in de-novo LBCL and not reached in patients with transformed iNHL. The OS at 12 months was 45% in patients with RT compared with 62% and 75% in patients with de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, worse OS was associated with RT histology, elevated LDH, and more prior lines of therapy. CAR T cell therapy can salvage a proportion of patients with CLL and RT exposed to prior targeted agents; however, efficacy in RT is inferior compared to de novo LBCL and transformed iNHL
Risk stratification is important for balancing potential risks and benefits of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for hematological malignancies. We retrospectively studied ...1119 patients undergoing allogenic-HSCT in a single center for five hematological indications assessing the prognostic role of LDH at admission for survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), relapse incidence (RI), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), higher than median LDH had an adverse effect on survival. The prognostic significance was strongest in AML, with higher LDH levels having lower 1-and 3-year survival 69.2% vs. 50.8%, P < 0.001 and 51.9% vs. 39.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, reduced 1-and 3-year PFS 62.4% vs. 42.1%, P < 0.001 48% vs. 35.2%, P < 0.001, respectively, higher cumulative incidence of 1-and 3-year NRM 11% vs. 17.3%, p = 0.01 and 15.7% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.04, and higher 1-and 3-year relapse incidence (RI) 26.7% vs. 40.7%, p < .0001 36.2% vs. 40.7%, respectively, P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis LDH maintained significant prognostic capacity in OS, PFS and RI. These findings in AML, validated in an independent cohort, suggest that LDH is a readily available tool that could be integrated into transplant risk assessments to aid decision-making and identify high-risk patients who may benefit from post-transplant pharmacological or cellular strategies.
Clinical decisions in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) are supported by the use of prognostic scores for outcome prediction. Scores vary in their features and in the ...composition of development cohorts. We sought to externally validate and compare the performance of 8 commonly applied scoring systems on a cohort of allo-HSCT recipients. Among 528 patients studied, acute myeloid leukemia was the leading transplant indication (44%) and 46% of patients had a matched sibling donor. Most models successfully grouped patients into higher and lower risk strata, supporting their use for risk classification. However, discrimination varied (2-year overall survival area under the receiver operating characteristic curve AUC: revised Pretransplantation Assessment of Mortality rPAM, 0.64; PAM, 0.63; revised Disease Risk Index rDRI, 0.62; Endothelial Activation and Stress Index EASIx, 0.60; combined European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation EBMT/Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-specific Comorbidity Index HCT-CI, 0.58; EBMT, 0.58; Comorbidity-Age, 0.58; HCT-CI, 0.55); AUC ranges from 0.5 (random) to 1.0 (perfect prediction). rPAM and PAM, which had the greatest predictive capacity across all outcomes, are comprehensive models including patient, disease, and transplantation information. Interestingly, EASIx, a biomarker-driven model, had comparable performance for nonrelapse mortality (NRM; 2-year AUC, 0.65) but no predictive value for relapse (2-year AUC, 0.53). Overall, allo-HSCT prognostic systems may be useful for risk stratification, but individual prediction remains a challenge, as reflected by the scores' limited discriminative capacity.
•Prognostic capacity varied across 8 allogeneic transplantation scores, with rPAM showing modest benefit across several outcomes.•EASIx, a biomarker-based prediction model, is among the strongest predictive scores of NRM.
Display omitted
PDF
