To study the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment for biliary stones in a large case list of patients treated in units with different experience and different workloads in a region of northern ...Italy.
We prospectively studied 700 patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or sphincterotomy, in 14 units (> or < 200 examinations/year), for their first treatment of biliary stones. The difficulty of the examinations, the results in terms of clearance of the stones, and the late outcomes (24 months) were recorded. A questionnaire (GHAA-9modified) was administered 24 hours and 30 days after the procedure to measure patient satisfaction.
There were six units with a heavy workload and eight with a light schedule. There were 176 (25.1 %) difficult examinations (Schutz grades 3, 4, and 5). Stones were found in 580 (82.9 %) and were cleared in 504 of these patients (86.9 %). No differences were observed in the clearance of stones for the different groups of difficulty and high- and low-volume centers. Over the 24-month follow-up period, 96 patients (13.7 %) complained of recurrent symptoms and 44 (6.3 %) had proof of stones. In all, 603 questionnaires were evaluable and more than 80 % of patients expressed satisfaction.
Our findings confirm the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of biliary stones. However, the number of patients with symptoms (13.7) after 24 months, with or without persistence of stones, was not insignificant. It is feasible to record patient satisfaction, and in this series patients stated they were satisfied. Criticism mostly concerned pain control and explanations provided before the examination.
Background:
Pharmacological prophylaxis of post‐ERCP pancreatitis is costly and not useful in most non‐selected patients, in whom the incidence of pancreatitis is 5% or less. However, it could be ...useful and probably cost‐effective, in patients at high risk for this complication, where the post‐procedure pancreatitis rate is 10% and more.
Aim:
To assess the efficacy of octreotide in reducing the incidence and severity of post‐ERCP pancreatitis and procedure‐related hospital stay, in subjects with known patient‐related risk factors.
Methods:
A total of 120 patients were randomly allocated to receive octreotide or not, in a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial. The drug was given subcutaneously, 200 μg t.d.s., starting 24 h before the ERCP procedure, in patients with either sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, or a history of relapsing pancreatitis or post‐ERCP pancreatitis, or who were aged under 35 years, or who had a small common bile duct diameter (< 8 mm).
Results:
A total of 114 patients (58 in the octreotide group and 56 in the control group) completed the trial. Post‐procedure pancreatitis occurred in seven octreotide‐treated patients (12.0%) and eight controls (14.3%). The two groups showed no significant differences in the incidence or severity of pancreatitis. Twenty‐four hours after the procedure, severe hyperamylasemia (more than five times the upper normal limit) without pancreatic‐like pain was recorded in three octreotide‐treated patients (5.2%) and six controls (10.7%), the difference being not significant.
Conclusion:
Twenty‐four‐hour prophylaxis with octreotide proved ineffective in preventing post‐ERCP pancreatitis and in avoiding 24‐h severe hyperamylasemia in high‐risk patients.
PDF
