The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a ...challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.
To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.
ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.
The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.
These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.
A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.
E. D. Rossi, F. Morassi, G. Santeusanio, G. F. Zannoni and G. Fadda Thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology processed by ThinPrep: an additional slide decreased the number of inadequate results Fine ...needle aspiration cytology is the most accurate tool for diagnosing thyroid nodules. Its accuracy is related to the rate of inadequate samples, which can be minimized with the adoption of on-site assessment of the adequacy of the material. The introduction of liquid-based cytology (LBC) in the thyroid does not allow checking on the adequacy of the cellularity. The possibility of making a second LBC slide for decreasing the number of non-diagnostic cases is studied. Out of 553 cases diagnosed in a single institution from January to March 2005, 166 consecutive cases with an LBC slide reviewed by the same pathologist were evaluated. The cases were classified in a five-tiered category system (Thy1 to 5 according to the British Thyroid Association guidelines) and all but two (with cystic degeneration) were processed by LBC and stained with Papanicolaou stain. The above-mentioned categories are defined as follows: Thy1 inadequate or haemorrhagic, Thy2 non-neoplastic lesion; Thy3 follicular lesion/suspected follicular neoplasm; Thy4 suspicious for malignancy; Thy5 diagnostic of malignancy. For each case the cytological diagnosis was made on the LBC slide and the adequacy of the cellularity for a conclusive diagnosis was assessed. Of the 166 cases, 39 were non-diagnostic (Thy1--inadequate), ten presented features of cystic degeneration (Thy1--haemorrhagic), 90 were benign (Thy2), 22 were diagnosed as a follicular lesion (Thy3), one as suspicious of malignancy (Thy4) and four as papillary carcinoma (Thy5). Thirty-nine cases had a second LBC for achieving a definitive diagnosis with eventual re-classification. Of these cases, 23 (61.5%) led to a conclusive diagnosis (18 Thy2, five Thy3) with a 18.5% decrease of the inadequacy rate. The making of an additional LBC slide helps in achieving a diagnosis in cases classified as non-diagnostic on the first standard slide (52.1% recovery rate). This procedure is particularly helpful for meeting the adequacy criteria in benign and indeterminate lesions and could also be used for refining the diagnosis of suspicious for a malignant thyroid neoplasm.