Perioperative use of probiotics serves as efficient prophylaxis against postoperative infections after liver transplantation, yet data on long-term effects of pre-transplant probiotic intake is ...lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of pre-transplant probiotic administration on long-term results of liver transplantation. This was secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Patients were randomized to receive either 4-strain probiotic or placebo before liver transplantation. Five year graft survival was set as the primary end-point. Secondary end-points comprised serum bilirubin and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, international normalized ratio (INR), serum transaminases and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity. Study group comprised 44 patients, of whom 21 received probiotics and 23 received placebo with 5-year graft survival of 81.0% and 87.0%, respectively (p = 0.591). Patients in the probiotic arm exhibited lower INR (p = 0.001) and CRP (p = 0.030) over the first 6 post-transplant months. In the absence of hepatitis B or C virus infection, pre-transplant administration of probiotics also reduced aspartate transaminase activity (p = 0.032). In the intervention arm, patients receiving probiotics for under and over 30 days had 5-year graft survival rates of 100% and 66.7%, respectively (p = 0.061). Duration of probiotic intake > 30 days was additionally associated with increased INR (p = 0.031), GGT (p = 0.032) and a tendency towards increased bilirubin (p = 0.074) over first 6 post-transplant months. Pre-transplant administration of probiotics has mild positive influence on 6-month allograft function, yet should not exceed 30 days due to potential negative effects on long-term outcomes. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01735591).
Prostate cancer has become an important clinical issue within deceased organ donors. There is still a considerable number of undiagnosed cancers, especially in early stage, despite frozen section ...analysis. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of orthotopic liver transplants (OLTx) with organs from donors with prostate cancer.
A retrospective analysis was performed in deceased liver donors whose prostate glands were harvested for histologic examinations because of prostate cancer suspicion. The study group consisted of 72 men reported as potential liver donors between 2011 and November 2017. Prostate glands were primarily assessed by frozen sections and afterward in routine examination. Generally cancer diagnosed in frozen specimen was not considered for OLTx. Recipients who received an organ from the donor with prostate cancer were actively surveilled.
There were 19 cases (26.40%) of prostate cancer diagnosed among the study group. In 12 cases diagnosis was made by frozen section assessment, of which 11 organs were disqualified from OLTx and 1 was transplanted. In 7 cases prostate cancer was diagnosed after OLTx in final routine histologic examination. Finally, 8 recipients (5 men and 3 women) received a new organ. Only 1 died during the perioperative period. In the remaining 7 patients the perioperative period was uneventful and no disease transmission was observed during follow-up.
Diagnosis of prostate cancer in donors should not be treated as a contraindication for OLTx because the risk of disease transmission is low. Potential recipients must be fully informed and kept under oncological surveillance.
•Eligibility of donors diagnosed as having prostate cancer is proposed to expand the donor organ pool.•No disease progression and cancer-related death was observed among liver transplant recipients.•Use of organs from donors diagnosed as having prostate cancer should not be avoided, but recipients must be put on active surveillance.
Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is one of the most severe complications after liver transplantation (LT). HAT can lead to early graft loss and retransplantation or death of the recipient.
This ...retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients treated between January 2008 and December 2013 in the Department of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery at the Medical University of Warsaw. A total of 750 patients underwent LT over this period.
HAT occurred in 27 patients (2.1%). The median DRI was 1.414 (IQR 1.103–1.578) points and median donor age was 47 (IQR 33–56) years. The optimal cut-off value of DRI in predicting HAT was ≥1.328 points. The cutoff point was characterized by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 88.0%, 41.3%, 5.5% and 98.9%, respectively (AUC = 0.605, 95% CI 0.477–0.733). A DRI ≥1.328 was a significant risk factor for HAT (OR = 5.16, 95% confidence interval CI 1.529–17.48, P = .008). The optimal cutoff point for donor age was 50 years and was characterized by sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 66.7%, 55.8%, 5.3%, and 97.8%, respectively. Donor age ≥50 years (OR = 2.53, 95% CI 1.123–5.714, P = .025) was a significant risk factor for HAT.
DRI is a clinically relevant factor that allows estimating the risk of HAT after liver transplantation from a deceased donor. To reduce the incidence of this complication, the allocation of organs taken from donors at DRI exceeding 1.328 for recipients without other HAT risk factors should be considered.
•DRI is a clinically relevant factor that allows estimating the risk of HAT after liver transplantation from a deceased donor.•To reduce the incidence of HAT, the allocation of organs taken from donors at DRI exceeding 1.328 for recipients without other HAT risk factors should be considered.•Donor age compared with the DRI is worse parameter to predict the occurrence of HAT after LT.
Despite worldwide debate on optimal selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation, the Milan criteria remain the benchmark for comparisons. Moreover, morphologic ...tumor features are universally considered important in pretransplant patient evaluation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) in assessing HCC burden before liver transplantation with special reference to Milan criteria fulfillment.
This retrospective study was based on a data from 27 HCC patients after liver transplantation with available CT performed within 30 days pretransplant. CT results were compared with explant pathology with respect to Milan criteria fulfillment, tumor number, and diameter of the largest tumor.
Out of 19 patients within the Milan criteria on CT, 3 fell beyond the criteria on explant pathology with a gross underestimation rate of 15.8%. Out of 8 patients beyond the Milan criteria on CT, 3 were within the criteria on explant pathology with a gross overestimation rate of 37.5%. Regarding tumor number, CT was accurate only in 14 patients (51.9%), while overestimation and underestimation occurred in 5 (18.5%) and 8 (29.6%) patients, respectively. Overestimation and underestimation of largest tumor size by at least 1 cm occurred in 4 (14.8%) and 7 (25.9%) patients, respectively.
Multiphasic CT is associated with a remarkable risk of both under- and overestimation of HCC burden before transplantation. Transplant eligibility should not be solely based on CT results.
•CT over- and underestimated Milan status in 37.5% and 15.8% of cases, respectively, in this study.•CT over- and underestimated HCC number in 18.5% and 29.6% of patients, respectively.•CT over- and underestimated HCC size in 25.9% and 14.8% of patients, respectively.
Abstract Background Acute renal failure (ARF) is one of the most significant complications of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), associated with increased mortality rate and the development of ...chronic renal dysfunction. The aim of the study was to determine the perioperative risk factors for ARF in patients without previous history of renal disease who are undergoing OLT. Materials and methods Forty-six patients who developed ARF after OLT performed in 1 transplant center were included in the study, and 52 consecutive patients without that complication served as a control group. Renal dysfunction was defined as a glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . The data concerning preoperative diseases, perioperative renal function, first-line immunosuppressive therapy, and blood transfusion requirement were retrospectively analyzed and compared among groups. Logistic regression modeling was used to determine risk factors for ARF. Results Patients who developed ARF were significantly older (mean age 53.3 vs 46.3 years, P = .057), had higher level of preoperative (0.79 vs 0.71 mg/dL, P = .0062) and intraoperative (0.85 vs 0.74 mg/dL, P = .0045) creatinine. The risk factors for ARF were intraoperative and 24-hour post-transplant creatinine level >0.9 mg/dL and high-dose tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Transfusion of ≤6 units of red blood cells diminished the risk of ARF. Sex and preoperative diseases were not predictive to ARF in our regression models. Conclusion Careful operative technique with low blood loss and immunosuppressive therapy of low nephrotoxic potential should be recommended in older patients to diminish the risk of renal dysfunction after orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients with higher levels of perioperative creatinine should be considered to have first-line immunosuppression without calcineurin inhibitors or with low-dose immunosuppressants of known nephrotoxic potential.
Prolonged initial intensive care unit (ICU) stay after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with prolonged total hospitalization, increased hospital mortality, and impaired patient and graft ...survival. Recent data suggested that model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score at the time of LT and the length of surgery were the two independent risk factors for an ICU stay longer than 3 days after LT. We further identified factors influencing prolonged ICU stay in single-center liver graft recipients.
One hundred fifty consecutive LT recipients (M/F 94/56, median age 55 (range, 39–60), 36% with viral hepatitis, were prospectively enrolled into the study. Associations between clinical factors and prolonged ICU stay were evaluated using logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristic curves were analyzed to determine the appropriate cutoffs for continuous variables. Threshold for significance was P ≤ .05.
Highly prolonged (≥8 days) and moderately prolonged (≥6 days) postoperative ICU stay was noted in 19 (12.7%) and 59 (39.3%) patients, respectively. Serum bilirubin (P = .001) and creatinine concentrations (P = .011), international normalized ratio (P = .004), and sodium-MELD (P < .001) were all significantly associated with postoperative intensive care unit stay over or equal to 75th percentile (6 days). Sodium-MELD was significantly associated with postoperative care unit stay greater or equal to the 90th percentile (8 days; P = .018).
Sodium-MELD might be a novel risk factor of prolonged ICU stay in this single-center experience.
•Sodium-MELD and its components are associated with moderately prolonged ICU stay after LT.•Only sodium-MELD is associated with highly prolonged ICU stay (≥8 days) after LT.•Pretransplant sodium-MELD ≥ 23 points carries a 75% risk of prolonged postoperative ICU stay.
Cardiovascular events (CVE) might occur in 20% to 70% of liver transplant recipients, and major CVE are associated with poor long-term survival. Overall, the ability to identify patients at the ...highest risk of death after liver transplantation (LT) has been improved. Abnormal pretransplant troponin I (TnI) level is regarded as one of predictors of postoperative CVE. We evaluated the number of early CVE after LT and the impact of pretransplant TnI on cardiovascular morbidity.
We prospectively enrolled 110 consecutive liver transplant recipients (M/F 67/43, age 53.3 ± 10.4 years, 32.7% with hepatitis C virus). Seven of them (6.4%) were on urgent protocol and 3 patients (2.7%) had re-LT. TnI level was measured at listing for LT and directly after LT; clinical outcomes were observed within the first 7 days after LT.
CVE during LT occurred in 51 recipients (46.4%). CVE after LT at the intensive care unit were noticed in 13 patients (11.8%). One patient (0.9%) died in the first 7 days after LT. The level of TnI >0.07 did not correlate with CVE during operation and 7 days after LT (P > .05), but the subgroup with TnI >0.07 before LT had a trend with higher TnI after LT (P = .065). Recipients with hepatitis C virus had a trend for higher TnI after LT (P = .061). CVE directly after LT correlated significantly with Child-Pugh (P = .01), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD incorporating serum sodium, and integrated MELD scales (P < .001).
In our single-center algorithm, TnI with canonical cutoff value of 0.07 was not an effective predictor for cardiac outcomes shortly after LT in our population.
•Cardiovascular events (CVEs) frequently occur during liver transplantation (LT).•CVE directly after LT correlates with severity of liver disease.•Canonical cutoff value of TnI >0.07 is not an effective predictor for CVE during LT.•TnI with cutoff value of 0.07 cannot help predict CVE shortly after LT.
Cardiovascular events (CVE) contribute to serious complications and death after liver transplantation (LT). Troponin I (TnI) level >0.07 mg/L and prior cardiac disease are known to be the independent ...predictors for posttransplant CVE. We evaluated single-center cardiac workup to predict early cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after LT.
We recruited 105 consecutive liver transplant recipients (male/female, 59/46; mean age, 51.66 ± 11.67 years). The cardiological assessment at evaluation for LT included medical history, electrocardiogram, echocardiography, Holter monitoring, and exercise test. We collected data regarding CVE including hypotonia with catecholamine usage, arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, pulmonary edema, and myocardial infarction within 7 days after LT.
CVE during LT occurred in 42 recipients (40%) and after LT in 9 patients (8.57%). Proposed cutoff level of TnI >0.07 mg/L did not correlate with CVE during operation (P = .73) or after LT (P = .47). CVE during LT was associated with arterial hypertension in medical history (P <.001), right ventricular systolic pressure (P< .05), and clinical scores: Child-Pugh (P = .04), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) (P = .04), MELD incorporating serum sodium (P<.03), and integrated MELD score (P = .01). CVE after LT correlated only with arrhythmia (P<.001) and catecholamine usage (P < .05) perioperatively. Of interest, catecholamine usage during LT was associated with prolonged stay at the intensive care unit (P < .05).
The single-center algorithm with noninvasive cardiac procedures without TnI assessment is optimal in evaluation before LT; however, medical history and severity of the liver disease are crucial for short-term cardiovascular morbidity after LT.
•Cardiovascular events (CVE) contribute to morbidity after liver transplantation (LT).•CVE during LT is associated with hypertension and right ventricular function.•Perioperative arrhythmias are predictors of CVE within 7 days after LT.•Medical history and liver disease severity are crucial for cardiac morbidity after LT.
Abstract Introduction Faced with a shortage of organs for liver transplantation, the use of grafts from older donors is justified. However, there remains little consensus on how this use impacts the ...graft and patient outcomes after transplantation from these older donors. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the graft and patient outcomes after liver transplantation from deceased donors >60 years of age. Methods From January 2007 to January 2011, 505 subjects were identified as liver graft donors after brain death, of which 7.35% were ≥60. To determine the effect of donor age on graft and patient outcomes, we analyzed donor age, recipient age, the Model for End-State Liver Disease (MELD) score of recipients at the time of transplantation, early posttransplant complications, and mortality. Results The posttransplant follow-up was 29 ± 25.5 months, and 3-year patient mortality from donors, grouped according to age, was 7.92% with donors <30; 15.78% with donors 30–50, 10.68% with donors 50–60, and 12.50% with donors >60. After analysis of patient and graft survival based on donor graft age, 3-year patient survival according donor age was 89.29% with donors <30, 83.85% with donors 30–50, 89.89% with donors 50–60, and 87.50% with donors >60. Analysis showed overall patient and graft survival rates from older donors were not worse than those from younger donors ( P > .1). Among the cases, 3-year patient survival according to MELD score was 91.19% with a MELD of I, 85.37% with a MELD of II, and 67.67% with a MELD of III; differences in graft and patient survival when comparing low MELD I and high MELD III were significantly different ( P < .01). Conclusions A more advanced age of a donor should not be a contraindication for liver transplantation. The present analysis shows that liver grafts from donors >60 can be used safely in older recipients who presented with relatively low MELD scores. Analyses also indicate that high MELD obtained before transplantation may be an important prognostic factor for graft and patient survival.
PDF
