Summary CNS metastases are the most common cause of malignant brain tumours in adults. Historically, patients with brain metastases have been excluded from most clinical trials, but their inclusion ...is now becoming more common. The medical literature is difficult to interpret because of substantial variation in the response and progression criteria used across clinical trials. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases (RANO-BM) working group is an international, multidisciplinary effort to develop standard response and progression criteria for use in clinical trials of treatment for brain metastases. Previous efforts have focused on aspects of trial design, such as patient population, variations in existing response and progression criteria, and challenges when incorporating neurological, neuro-cognitive, and quality-of-life endpoints into trials of patients with brain metastases. Here, we present our recommendations for standard response and progression criteria for the assessment of brain metastases in clinical trials. The proposed criteria will hopefully facilitate the development of novel approaches to this difficult problem by providing more uniformity in the assessment of CNS metastases across trials.
Summary Tumours respond differently to immunotherapies compared with chemotherapeutic drugs, raising questions about the assessment of changes in tumour burden—a mainstay of evaluation of cancer ...therapeutics that provides key information about objective response and disease progression. A consensus guideline—iRECIST—was developed by the RECIST working group for the use of modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST version 1.1) in cancer immunotherapy trials, to ensure consistent design and data collection, facilitate the ongoing collection of trial data, and ultimate validation of the guideline. This guideline describes a standard approach to solid tumour measurements and definitions for objective change in tumour size for use in trials in which an immunotherapy is used. Additionally, it defines the minimum datapoints required from future trials and those currently in development to facilitate the compilation of a data warehouse to use to later validate iRECIST. An unprecedented number of trials have been done, initiated, or are planned to test new immune modulators for cancer therapy using a variety of modified response criteria. This guideline will allow consistent conduct, interpretation, and analysis of trials of immunotherapies.
Summary Oestrogen receptors are overexpressed in around 70% of all breast cancers, and are a target for endocrine therapy. These receptors can be visualised on PET with use of 16α-18 ...F-fluoro-17β-oestradiol (18 F-FES) as a tracer. Compared with biopsy, which enables assessment of individual sites, whole-body18 F-FES-PET enables quantification of oestrogen-receptor expression in all metastases. In several studies, measurement of tumour protein expression in oestrogen receptors by18 F-FES-PET, concurrent with biopsy, detected oestrogen-receptor-positive tumour lesions with a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 98%. Roughly 45% of patients with metastatic breast cancer have discordant oestrogen-receptor expression across lesions (ie,18 F-FES-positive and18 F-FES-negative metastases). Low tumour18 F-FES uptake in metastases can predict failure of hormonal therapy in patients with oestrogen-receptor-positive primary tumours. Finally,18 F-FES-PET has shown that oestrogen-receptor binding capacity changes after intervention with hormonal drugs, but findings need to be confirmed. Factors other than oestrogen-receptor expression, including menopausal status and concomitant therapies, that can affect tumour18 F-FES uptake must be taken into account.
SummaryBackgroundTrastuzumab duocarmazine is a novel HER2-targeting antibody–drug conjugate comprised of trastuzumab covalently bound to a linker drug containing duocarmycin. Preclinical studies ...showed promising antitumour activity in various models. In this first-in-human study, we assessed the safety and activity of trastuzumab duocarmazine in patients with advanced solid tumours. MethodsWe did a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. The dose-escalation cohort comprised patients aged 18 years or older enrolled from three academic hospitals in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumours with variable HER2 status who were refractory to standard cancer treatment. A separate cohort of patients were enrolled to the dose-expansion phase from 15 hospitals in Belgium, the Netherlands, Spain, and the UK. Dose-expansion cohorts included patients aged 18 years or older with breast, gastric, urothelial, or endometrial cancer with at least HER2 immunohistochemistry 1+ expression and measurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Trastuzumab duocarmazine was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 3-week cycle. In the dose-escalation phase, trastuzumab duocarmazine was given at doses of 0·3 mg/kg to 2·4 mg/kg (3 + 3 design) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the dose-escalation phase was to assess safety and ascertain the recommended phase 2 dose, which would be the dose used in the dose-expansion phase. The primary endpoint of the dose-expansion phase was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (complete response or partial response), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02277717, and is fully recruited. FindingsBetween Oct 30, 2014, and April 2, 2018, 39 patients were enrolled and treated in the dose-escalation phase and 146 patients were enrolled and treated in the dose-expansion phase. One dose-limiting toxic effect (death from pneumonitis) occurred at the highest administered dose (2·4 mg/kg) in the dose-escalation phase. One further death occurred in the dose-escalation phase (1·5 mg/kg cohort) due to disease progression, which was attributed to general physical health decline. Grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events reported more than once in the dose-escalation phase were keratitis (n=3) and fatigue (n=2). Based on all available data, the recommended phase 2 dose was set at 1·2 mg/kg. In the dose-expansion phase, treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 16 (11%) of 146 patients, most commonly infusion-related reactions (two 1%) and dyspnoea (two 1%). The most common treatment-related adverse events (grades 1–4) were fatigue (48 33% of 146 patients), conjunctivitis (45 31%), and dry eye (45 31%). Most patients (104 71% of 146) had at least one ocular adverse event, with grade 3 events reported in ten (7%) of 146 patients. No patients died from treatment-related adverse events and four patients died due to disease progression, which were attributed to hepatic failure (n=1), upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage (n=1), neurological decompensation (n=1), and renal failure (n=1). In the breast cancer dose-expansion cohorts, 16 (33%, 95% CI 20·4–48·4) of 48 assessable patients with HER2-positive breast cancer achieved an objective response (all partial responses) according to RECIST. Nine (28%, 95% CI 13·8–46·8) of 32 patients with HER2-low, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and six (40%, 16·3–67·6) of 15 patients with HER2-low, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer achieved an objective response (all partial responses). Partial responses were also observed in one (6%, 95% CI 0·2–30·2) of 16 patients with gastric cancer, four (25%, 7·3–52·4) of 16 patients with urothelial cancer, and five (39%, 13·9–68·4) of 13 patients with endometrial cancer. InterpretationTrastuzumab duocarmazine shows notable clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer, including HER2-positive trastuzumab emtansine-resistant and HER2-low breast cancer, with a manageable safety profile. Further investigation of trastuzumab duocarmazine for HER2-positive breast cancer is ongoing and trials for HER2-low breast cancer and other HER2-expressing cancers are in preparation. FundingSynthon Biopharmaceuticals.
Summary Cardiovascular toxicity is one of the most devastating complications of cancer treatment and can arise during or shortly after treatment, or even several years later. Identification of the ...left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the most common method to screen for toxic effects on the heart; however, this approach underestimates cardiac damage and additional strategies for the monitoring of treatment-induced cardiotoxicity are being explored. Guidelines for monitoring have been formulated for several cancer treatments; however, appropriate underlying evidence is still largely absent. In this Review, we summarise conventional and contemporary methods for early detection of cardiotoxicity and designate a level of evidence for the basis of each method.
PDF