ABSTRACT IN SLOVENE: V clanku je orisana vloga slovenskih diplomatov v drugi Jugoslaviji pri izvajanju jugoslovanske zunanje politike do obeh nemskih drzav. Prikazana je predvsem dejavnost vidnih ...slovenskih diplomatov - politikov Dusana Kvedra, Alesa Beblerja, Rudija Cacinovica in Mitje Vosnjaka, omenjeni pa so tudi Anton Vratusa, Stane Pavlic in Jaka Avsic. Avtor ugotavlja, da je bilo v okviru jugoslovanske diplomacije in odnosov z nemsko govorecim prostorom opazno mesto namenjeno prav slovenskim diplomatom. Mozno je celo domnevati, da so diplomatska mesta v sosednjih drzavah, Avstriji in Italiji, ter v Nemciji, domala po pravilu v Beogradu dodeljevali slovenskim diplomatom. Najbrz gre tudi za vprasanje poznavanja jezika, saj naj bi bila nemscina Slovencem (in Hrvatom) blize kot drugim v Jugoslaviji. // ABSTRACT IN ITALIAN: L'articolo illustra il ruolo dei diplomatici sloveni nel secondo dopoguerra jugoslavo nell'attuazione della politica estera jugoslava all'interno dei rapporti con entrambi gli stati tedeschi. In particolar modo viene descritta l'attivitá dei diplomatici sloveni di maggior rilievo - dei politici Dusan Kveder, Ales Bebler, Rudi Cacinovic e Mitja Vosnjak, per non dimenticare l'azione svolta anche da Anton Vratusa, Stane Pavlic e Jaka Avsic. L'Autore osserva che, nell'ambito della diplomazia jugoslava e delle relazioni con l'area di lingua tedesca, proprio ai diplomatici sloveni venne assegnato un ruolo di particolare importanza. E' lecito addirittura pensare che gli incarichi diplomatici nei Paesi confinanti, quali Austria, Italia e Germania, fossero affidati da Belgrado, quasi di norma, a diplomatici sloveni. Si può supporre che la scelta fosse determinata anche dalla conoscenza della lingua, poiché sembra che il tedesco fosse molto più familiare agli sloveni (e ai croati) che agli altri popoli jugoslavi. // ABSTRACT IN ENGLISH: By investigating the activities of Slovene diplomats in the two German states, the author points to the turbulent political-economic relations of Yugoslavia with both German states FRG and GDR between 1949 and 1973, focusing on the period after mid-1950s. Despite the fact that in the second half of the 1950s the Yugoslav foreign minister was a brilliant Serbian diplomat Koca Popovic, it was Slovene diplomats, among them especially deputy foreign minister Ales Bebler, who were involved extensively in the German issues in the Belgrade `zuta kuca'/`yellow house' (used colloquially for the foreign ministry in Belgrade), especially in the problems occuring at the breaking off of diplomatic relations with FRG. Moreover, the first Yugoslav ambassador in GDR was a Slovene, Mitja Vosnjak. Knowing that the Yugoslav embassy in Prague had an important role in establishing diplomatic relations with GDR (it was the place for diplomatic `feeling the ground', while the person appointed for these contacts was councillor to the embassy, the second man of the embassy, Marko Kadunec, a Slovene) and knowing that colonel general Jaka Avsic - the leader of the post-war Yugoslav military mission with a diplomatic status and headquarters in West Berlin, which when needed dealt also with the political problematic in question - was also Slovene, it seems that in this period at least the realisation, if not the planning of the Yugoslav politics toward the German question was in the hands of Slovenes. The author thus gives a lengthy description of the activities of Slovene diplomats Dusan Kveder and Rudi Cacinovic, who were Yugoslav ambassadors in Bonn in those ground-breaking years. The former was active in the time of the implementation of the so called Hallstein Doctrine, which resulted in the breaking off of diplomatic relations between Yugoslavia and FRG because Yugoslavia in October 1957 recognized the GDR; the latter in 1968, when diplomatic relations were restored. His role was especially significant in the following years when certain key issues of relations between the states were being addressed (and some were solved), such as: the question of compensation for Nazi crimes during World War II, the question of the emigration hostile to Yugoslavia, and the question of the so called Yugoslavian `gastarbeiters'. Since it is difficult to have a thorough understanding of relations between Yugoslavia and FRG without knowledge of the relations between SFRY and GDR, the author has also tapped into these relations and delineated the role of the first Yugoslav ambassador in GDR, Mitja Vosnjak. The author concludes his article with the following insight: `Even this brief and undoubtedly incomplete investigation of the activities of certain Slovene diplomats in relation to the formation and realisation of Yugoslav politics toward both Germanys clearly points to their enormous and successful contribution to the normalisation and development of bilateral relations. Career diplomats of this sort are needed in every country.'
Članak obrađuje dosad manje poznatu problematiku zamisli/nacrta o rješe-nju pitanja grada Trsta, čiji je glavni autor bio Edvard Kardelj. On se priklonio i u cjelini preuzeo stručnu argumentaciju ...koju su pripravili ponajprije slovenski i hrvatski znanstvenici. Radi se o vremenu prije prvoga zasjedanja Vijeća mini-stara vanjskih poslova u rujnu 1945. u Londonu. Na tom je sastanku jugoslavenska delegacija koju je vodio tadašnji potpredsjednik savezne vlade Edvard Kardelj, 18. rujna 1945. predložila memorandum koji je sadržavao prijedlog nacrta rješe-nja pitanja Trsta. Nacrt je nastajao otprilike od svibnja do listopada 1945. i za grad Trst predviđao potpunu autonomiju i status sedme federalne jedinice Demokratske Federativne Jugoslavije, a za luku Trst položaj slobodne luke pod međunarodnom upravom. Detaljno argumentirani memorandum zadobio je priznanje čak i protivnika jugoslavenskih zahtjeva, ali je sudbinu Trsta odredila “visoka politika” u kojoj stručni argumenti nisu imali posebnu težinu.
The article is a short survey of the results of the Target Research Project "Comparative study of the security system in the crisis situation with regard to refugee issues: the problem of Hungarian ...refugees in Slovenia after WWII and particularly in the years 1956 to 1957", dealing with Hungarian refugee issues in Slovenia in the period, presented from a wider perspective. Within the international context and based on German, Austrian, Yugoslav and Slovene archives and literature, the study presents Yugoslav-Hungarian and Yugoslav-Soviet relations in the light of the 1956 Hungarian revolution and its impact in Slovenia and Yugoslavia. The emphasis is on the Hungarian refugee issues in Yugoslavia and Slovenia, particularly on the arrival of refugees to Yugoslavia, their settling in camps, along with the system and financing of the latter. Some 20.000 Hungarian refugees sought shelter in Yugoslavia, which is about one tenth of all refugees who left Hungarian after the suppression of the revolution. 2361 refugees were placed in camps in the territory of Slovenia. Apart from the archives, newspapers and other literature, the authors also made use of the method of in-depth interviews. PUBLICATION ABSTRACT
The article is a short survey of the results of the Target Research Project "Comparative study of the security system in the crisis situation with regard to refugee issues: the problem of Hungarian ...refugees in Slovenia after WWII & particularly in the years 1956 to 1957," dealing with Hungarian refugee issues in Slovenia in the period, presented from a wider perspective. Within the international context & based on German, Austrian, Yugoslav & Slovene archives & literature, the study presents Yugoslav-Hungarian & Yugoslav-Soviet relations in the light of the 1956 Hungarian revolution & its impact in Slovenia & Yugoslavia. The emphasis is on the Hungarian refugee issues in Yugoslavia & Slovenia, particularly on the arrival of refugees to Yugoslavia, their settling in camps, along with the system & financing of the latter. Some 20.000 Hungarian refugees sought shelter in Yugoslavia, which is about one tenth of all refugees who left Hungarian after the suppression of the revolution. 2361 refugees were placed in camps in the territory of Slovenia. Apart from the archives, newspapers & other literature, the authors also made use of the method of in-depth interviews. Adapted from the source document.