F. Jagla, M. Jergelová, I. Riečanský.
Obsahuje bibliografii a bibliografické odkazy
The saccadic eye movement related potentials (SEMRPs) enable to study brain mechanisms of the sensorimotor ...integration. SEMRPs provide insight into various cognitive mechanisms related to planning, programming, generation and execution of the saccadic eye movements. SEMRPs can be used to investigate pathophysiological mechanisms of several disorders of the central nervous system. Here we shortly summarize basic findings concerning the significance of SEMRP components, their relationship to the functional brain asymmetry and visual attention level as well as changes related to certain neuropsychological disorders.
U ovom radu autor razmatra pravna pitanja u svezi s pokrićem gubitka ili oštećenja nastalog zbog skrivene mane u strojevima ili trupu broda. Kako bismo znali što je sve pokriveno, potrebno je ...razumjeti odluku Apelacijskog suda u predmetu Nukila (1997.) i novu klauzulu 2.2.2. Međunarodnih klauzula za osiguranje brodova iz 2003. Jasno je da je temeljno pokriće gubitka ili oštećenja osiguranog predmeta nastalo zbog skrivene mane u strojevima ili trupu broda isto kao u prijašnjim Institutskim klauzulama. U tom smislu, čini se da su osiguratelji zauzeli stav da bi se osnovno pokriće trupa broda trebalo vratiti na poziciju prije slučaja Nukila, što je bilo općeprihvaćeno prije ove sudske presude.
In this article the author considers legal questions in respect of covers loss or damage to the subject-matter caused by latent defect in the machinery or hull. To see what is in fact covered one must understand the Court of Appeal decision in the Nukila (1997) and the new clause 2.2.2. of International Hull Clauses of 2003.It is then clear that the basic coverage for loss of or damage to the subject matter insured caused by latent defect in the machinery or hull is exactly the same as with previous Institute Time Clauses. In the case of damage, it is repaired, it is the reasonable costs of repairing that consequential damage after allowing for any deductible, that is claimable. Any claim should therefore initially be adjusted in exactly the same way under all three sets of Clauses (1983, 1995 and 2003). Then, in the case of the new clauses, there is novel restriction on coverage to be considered – do actual costs so adjusted of repairing the consequential damage exceed the costs that would have been incurred to correct the latent defect. To the extent that they do, the assured may recover. In this sense, the underwriters appear to have taken the wiev that the basic hull cover should revert to the pre Nukila position, which had generally been accepted until that case was litigated.
