Stormwater control measures (SCMs) have the potential to mitigate negative effects of watershed development on hydrology and water quality. Stormwater regulations and scientific literature have ...assumed that SCMs are important sites for denitrification, the permanent removal of nitrogen, but this assumption has been informed mainly by short-term loading studies and measurements of potential rates of nitrogen cycling. Recent research concluded that SCM nitrogen removal can be dominated by plant and soil assimilation rather than by denitrification, and rates of nitrogen fixation can exceed rates of denitrification in SCM sediments, resulting in a net addition of nitrogen. Nitrogen cycling measurements from other human-impacted aquatic habitats have presented similar results, additionally suggesting that dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and algal uptake could be important processes for recycling nitrogen in SCMs. Future research should directly measure a suite of nitrogen cycling processes in SCMs and reveal controlling mechanisms of individual rate processes. There is ample opportunity for research on SCM nitrogen cycling, including investigations of seasonal variation, differences between climatic regions, and trade-offs between nitrogen removal and phosphorus removal. Understanding nitrogen dynamics within SCMs will inform more efficient SCM design and management that promotes denitrification to help mitigate negative effects of urban stormwater on downstream ecosystems.
Display omitted
•SCMs are considered important sites for denitrification.•Studies reporting high denitrification rates in SCMs mostly used indirect assays.•Direct denitrification measurements suggest temporary removal pathways may dominate in SCMs.•Nitrogen cycling within SCMs should be measured using direct methods.•Quantifying seasonal and spatial variability of SCM nitrogen cycling is critical.
Road runoff contributes an array of pollutants which degrade the quality of receiving waters. Sediment conveyed in runoff results in loss of habitat and loss of reservoir capacity, among other ...undesirable impacts. To select and design stormwater control measures (SCMs), the sediment particle size distribution (PSD) is needed to quantify the required hydraulic retention time for particle settling and to understand what other treatment processes (e.g., filtration) are needed to meet sediment removal targets. A two-year field monitoring study was undertaken across the state of Ohio, USA, to evaluate the PSD of sediment in runoff at twelve roads. The highest TSS concentrations were observed on interstate highways (highest annual average daily traffic AADT) and minor arterials (low AADT), suggesting factors beyond AADT, such as antecedent dry period, rainfall intensity, and windborne dust and particulates, contribute to the varied sediment characteristics in runoff. The median TSS load across all samples collected was 2.7 kg/ha per storm event, while annual TSS loads for the monitoring sites varied from 98 kg/(ha·yr) to 519 kg/(ha·yr), with a mean value of 271 kg/(ha·yr). Particle size distributions varied across the monitoring sites, with mean and median d
of 48.6 μm and 52.5 μm, respectively. Interstate highways (highest AADT) had significantly finer PSDs than other functional classes, while roads in low density residential areas had coarser PSDs than other land uses. Observed differences in PSD across road characteristics may guide SCM selection; dry detention basins and wet ponds/wetlands were predicted to provide effective removal across a variety of PSDs, while TSS reductions provided by hydrodynamic separators and high-flow media filters (which effectively remove larger particles) may be maximized in areas with coarser PSDs (e.g., roads surrounded by low density residential areas studied herein).
•Impact of real-time control rainwater harvesting systems on stormwater network was modelled by coupling SWMM and RTC model in R.•Real-time controlled rainwater harvesting systems can mitigate ...drainage network flooding by reducing stormwater runoff at source.•Implementing RTC in RWH storages yielded greater benefits than simply increasing storage capacity.
Real-Time Control (RTC) technology is increasingly applied in Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) systems to optimise their performance related to water supply and flood mitigation. However, most studies to date have focussed on testing the benefits at an individual site scale, leaving the potential benefits for downstream stormwater networks largely untested. In this study, we developed a methodology to predict how at-source RTC RWH systems influence the behaviour of a stormwater network. Simulation was enabled by coupling the drainage model in SWMM with an RTC RWH model coded using the R software. We modelled two different RTC strategies across a range of system settings (e.g. storage size for RWH and proportion of storage to which RTC is applied) under two different climate scenarios—current and future climates. The simulations showed that RTC reduced flooding volume and peak flow of the stormwater network, leading to a potential mitigation of urban flooding risks, while also providing a decentralised supplementary water supply. Implementing RTC in more of RWH storages yielded greater benefits than simply increasing storage capacity, in both current and future climates. More importantly, the RTC systems are capable of more precisely managing the resultant flow regime in reducing the erosion and restoring the pre-development conditions in sensitive receiving waters. Our study suggests that RTC RWH storages distributed throughout a catchment can substantially improve the performance of existing drainage systems, potentially avoiding or deferring expensive network upgrades. Investments in real-time control technology would appear to be more promising than investments in detention volume alone.
Green roofs are increasingly being used among the suite of tools designed to reduce the volume of surface water runoff generated by cities. Plants provide the primary mechanism for restoring the ...rainfall retention capacity of green roofs, but selecting plants with high water use is likely to increase drought stress. Using empirically-derived plant physiological parameters, we used a water balance model to assess the trade-off between rainfall retention and plant drought stress under a 30-year climate scenario. We compared high and low water users with either drought avoidance or drought tolerance strategies. Green roofs with low water-using, drought-avoiding species achieved high rainfall retention (66–81%) without experiencing significant drought stress. Roofs planted with other strategies showed high retention (72–90%), but they also experienced >50days of drought stress per year. However, not all species with the same strategy behaved similarly, therefore selecting plants based on water use and drought strategy alone does not guarantee survival in shallow substrates where drought stress can develop quickly. Despite this, it is more likely that green roofs will achieve high rainfall retention with minimal supplementary irrigation if planted with low water users with drought avoidance strategies.
Plant water use strategies were compared to assess the trade-off between hydrological performance (rainfall retention) and the number of drought stress days experienced. During a 30-year climate scenario, green roofs with low water-using, drought-avoiding plants achieved high rainfall retention with minimal drought stress. R and P values were derived from correlation analysis. Display omitted
•Green roof plant selection is a trade-off between retention and drought risk.•Rainfall retention and drought stress were modelled over a 30-year climate scenario.•Low water-using, drought-avoiders achieved high retention and low drought stress.
Stormwater from complex land uses is an important contributor of contaminants of concern (COCs) such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Copper, and Zinc to ...receiving water bodies. A large portion of these COCs bind to particulate matter in stormwater, which can be removed through filtration by traditional media. However, the remaining dissolved COCs can be significant and require special attention such as engineered treatment measures and media. Biochar is a porous sorbent produced from a variety of organic materials. In the last decade biochar has been gaining attention as a stormwater treatment medium due to low cost compared to activated carbon. However, biochar is not a uniform product and selection of an appropriate biochar for the removal of specific contaminants can be a complex process. Biochars are synthesized from various feedstocks and using different manufacturing approaches, including pyrolysis temperature, impact the biochar properties thus affecting ability to remove stormwater contaminants. The local availability of specific biochar products is another important consideration. An evaluation of proposed stormwater control measure (SCM) media needs to consider the dynamic conditions associated with stormwater and its management, but the passive requirements of the SCM. The media should be able to mitigate flood risks, remove targeted COCs under high flow SCM conditions, and address practical considerations like cost, sourcing, and construction and maintenance. This paper outlines a process for selecting promising candidates for SCM media and evaluating their performance through laboratory tests and field deployment with special attention to unique stormwater considerations.
Display omitted
•Evaluation strategy for media-based stormwater control measures (SCMs).•Targeting stormwater contaminants of concern (COC).•Biochar characteristics and removal potential for COCs.•Challenges and future considerations for biochar application in SCMs.
The management of urban stormwater has become increasingly complex over recent decades. Consequently, terminology describing the principles and practices of urban drainage has become increasingly ...diverse, increasing the potential for confusion and miscommunication. This paper documents the history, scope, application and underlying principles of terms used in urban drainage and provides recommendations for clear communication of these principles. Terminology evolves locally and thus has an important role in establishing awareness and credibility of new approaches and contains nuanced understandings of the principles that are applied locally to address specific problems. Despite the understandable desire to have a 'uniform set of terminology', such a concept is flawed, ignoring the fact that terms reflect locally shared understanding. The local development of terminology thus has an important role in advancing the profession, but authors should facilitate communication between disciplines and between regions of the world, by being explicit and accurate in their application.
Deleterious effects of urban stormwater are widely recognized. In several countries, regulations have been put into place to improve the conditions of receiving water bodies, but planning and ...engineering of stormwater control is typically carried out at smaller scales. Quantifying cumulative effectiveness of many stormwater control measures on a watershed scale is critical to understanding how small‐scale practices translate to urban river health. We review 100 empirical and modelling studies of stormwater management effectiveness at the watershed scale in diverse physiographic settings. Effects of networks with stormwater control measures (SCMs) that promote infiltration and harvest have been more intensively studied than have detention‐based SCM networks. Studies of peak flows and flow volumes are common, whereas baseflow, groundwater recharge, and evapotranspiration have received comparatively little attention. Export of nutrients and suspended sediments have been the primary water quality focus in the United States, whereas metals, particularly those associated with sediments, have received greater attention in Europe and Australia. Often, quantifying cumulative effects of stormwater management is complicated by needing to separate its signal from the signal of urbanization itself, innate watershed characteristics that lead to a range of hydrologic and water quality responses, and the varying functions of multiple types of SCMs. Biases in geographic distribution of study areas, and size and impervious surface cover of watersheds studied also limit our understanding of responses. We propose hysteretic trajectories for how watershed function responds to increasing imperviousness and stormwater management. Even where impervious area is treated with SCMs, watershed function may not be restored to its predevelopment condition because of the lack of treatment of all stormwater generated from impervious surfaces; non‐additive effects of individual SCMs; and persistence of urban effects beyond impervious surfaces. In most cases, pollutant load decreases largely result from run‐off reductions rather than lowered solute or particulate concentrations. Understanding interactions between natural and built landscapes, including stormwater management strategies, is critical for successfully managing detrimental impacts of stormwater at the watershed scale.
This paper presents a methodology for assessing the selection of stormwater control measures (SCM) within an urban drainage system that combines hydrological-hydraulic modelling and multi-criteria ...analysis (MCA). The methodology's utility is illustrated on urban catchment in the city of Girona, Spain. The SWMM model was applied and calibrated to simulate SCM scenarios. Seven scenarios were evaluated consisting of one grey infrastructure measure using underground storage tank and three nature-based SCM i.e. infiltration basins, infiltration trenches, green roofs, and combinations thereof. These scenarios were evaluated with MCA including combined sewer overflow (CSO) reduction, CAPEX, OPEX, amenity, biodiversity, and feasibility regarding ownership. The results show that the scenario that included only infiltration basins was most favourable, followed by the scenario which combined infiltration basins and trenches. The underground storage tank was the least favourable with the lowest grade, due to high CAPEX and OPEX, and due to single functionality.
Display omitted
•Methodology for multi-criteria assessment of stormwater control measures.•Nature-based and conventional measures evaluated in real urban catchment.•Scenarios of measures implementation evaluated using MCA.•Infiltration basins proved to be the most favourable measure for given conditions.
Climate change (higher frequency and intensity of precipitation events) and land use change (urbanization reducing soil drainage capacity) are increasingly causing stormwater problems globally, ...especially in cities. Nature-based solutions such as urban greenspace rehabilitation programs are gaining considerable attention for restoring soil retention capacity and protecting cities against increasing flood risk. However, a better understanding of how effective such measures are in practice is needed to enable and promote their adoption across urban settings.
To this end, in this study, we assess the effect of soil rehabilitation measures in terms of soil compaction, vegetation cover and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity by analysing the results of an infiltration measurement campaign conducted across a wide range of real-world greenspaces (from recently rehabilitated, to poorly maintained, down to highly degraded) in the Italian city of Milan, one of the most urbanized areas in Europe.
Our results show that the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity varies significantly across the examined greenspaces, due to differences in time from rehabilitation, soil compaction and vegetation cover. Specifically, we find that the highest unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is obtained after approximately 5 years since implementation of soil rehabilitation measures, which can be explained by the time needed (i) by the introduced vegetation to develop root systems, and (ii) by the soil matrix to develop a coherent structure that allows stable connections between pores and thus the strengthening of preferential water pathways. Finally, our study shows that, in absence of soil and vegetation maintenance, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity may decrease rapidly after about 9–12 years.
These findings provide useful information for supporting the planning of nature-based solutions in practice, which will become increasingly important to protect our cities from climate change impacts and widespread urbanization going forwards.
Display omitted
•Soil rehabilitation increases the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of urban greenspaces•The highest unsaturated hydraulic conductivity is obtained after 5 years after soil rehabilitation•In absence of soil and vegetation maintenance, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity may decrease after 9-12 years•Vegetation cover increases unsaturated hydraulic conductivity due to preferential flow and improved soil structure
•Age and sand content were the most influencing factors on the soil TN accumulation.•Denitrification potential and δ15 N values increased with the age of basins.•With the N limitation in young basins ...(≤ 3 years) N fixation is likely to occur.•Top 5 cm of bioretention's soil accounted for 29% of soil TN stocks.•C3 plants (e.g., bioretention plants) were the primary source of soil C.
Bioretention basins are one of the most commonly used green stormwater features, with the potential to accumulate significant levels of nitrogen (N) in their soil and to permanently remove it through denitrification. Many studies have investigated the N removal potential of bioretention basins through the assessment of inflow and outflow concentrations. However, their long-term N removal through soil accumulation and denitrification potential is less known. This study investigated the temporal variation of total N (TN) accumulation and denitrification potential in soils of 25 bioretention basins within a 13-year soil chronosequence, in a subtropical climate in Australia. The denitrification potential of a subset of seven bioretention basins was investigated in accompaniment with nutrient and soil characteristics. Additionally, stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) were used to assess temporal changes in the soil composition as well as to identify the sources of carbon (C) into these basins. Over 13 years of operation, TN accumulated faster in the top 5 cm of soil than deeper soils. Soil TN density was highest in the top 5 cm with an average of 1.4 kg N m−3, which was about two times higher than deeper soils. Site age and soil texture were the best predictors of soil TN density and denitrification (1 to 9.7 mg N m−2 h−1). The isotope values were variable among basins. Low δ15N values in young basins (-1.02‰) suggested fixation as the main source of N, while older basins had higher δ15N, indicating higher denitrification. Bioretention plants were the primary source of soil C; although the occurrence of soil amendment also contributed to the C pool. To improve the performance of these bioretention basins, we recommend increasing vegetation at initial years after construction, and enhancing more frequent anaerobic conditions in the high soil profile. These two conditions can improve denitrification potential, and thus the performance of these basins for improving water quality.
(a) Linear accumulation of TN in bioretention soil with age (x-axis) and within the soil profile (y-axis); (b) correlation matrix: positive and negative correlations are shown in red and blue color, respectively. The size of circles and the color intensity are proportional to the strength of the correlation; * and ** indicate significance at the level of 0.05 and 0.01, respectively. The bold black box represents the analysis on 25 bioretention basins, and the rest represent the analysis on a subset of seven bioretention basins. Display omitted
PDF
