NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Fakhry, Carole; Zhang, Qiang; Nguyen-Tân, Phuc Felix; Rosenthal, David I; Weber, Randal S; Lambert, Louise; Trotti, 3rd, Andy M; Barrett, William L; Thorstad, Wade L; Jones, Christopher U; Yom, Sue S; Wong, Stuart J; Ridge, John A; Rao, Shyam S D; Bonner, James A; Vigneault, Eric; Raben, David; Kudrimoti, Mahesh R; Harris, Jonathan; Le, Quynh-Thu; Gillison, Maura L

    Journal of clinical oncology, 12/2017, Letnik: 35, Številka: 36
    Journal Article

    Purpose Treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is evolving toward risk-based modification of therapeutic intensity, which requires patient-specific estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Methods To develop and validate nomograms for OS and PFS, we used a derivation cohort of 493 patients with OPSCC with known p16 tumor status (surrogate of human papillomavirus) and cigarette smoking history (pack-years) randomly assigned to clinical trials using platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG 0129 and 0522). Nomograms were created from Cox models and internally validated by use of bootstrap and cross-validation. Model discrimination was measured by calibration plots and the concordance index. Nomograms were externally validated in a cohort of 153 patients with OPSCC randomly assigned to a third trial, NRG Oncology RTOG 9003. Results Both models included age, Zubrod performance status, pack-years, education, p16 status, and T and N stage; the OS model also included anemia and age × pack-years interaction; and the PFS model also included marital status, weight loss, and p16 × Zubrod interaction. Predictions correlated well with observed 2-year and 5-year outcomes. The uncorrected concordance index was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.80) for OS and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.74) for PFS, and bias-corrected indices were similar. In the validation set, OS and PFS models were well calibrated, and OS and PFS were significantly different across tertiles of nomogram scores (log-rank P = .003;< .001). Conclusion The validated nomograms provided useful prediction of OS and PFS for patients with OPSCC treated with primary radiation-based therapy.