E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Prekker, Matthew E; Driver, Brian E; Trent, Stacy A; Resnick-Ault, Daniel; Seitz, Kevin P; Russell, Derek W; Gaillard, John P; Latimer, Andrew J; Ghamande, Shekhar A; Gibbs, Kevin W; Vonderhaar, Derek J; Whitson, Micah R; Barnes, Christopher R; Walco, Jeremy P; Douglas, Ivor S; Krishnamoorthy, Vijay; Dagan, Alon; Bastman, Jill J; Lloyd, Bradley D; Gandotra, Sheetal; Goranson, Jordan K; Mitchell, Steven H; White, Heath D; Palakshappa, Jessica A; Espinera, Alyssa; Page, David B; Joffe, Aaron; Hansen, Sydney J; Hughes, Christopher G; George, Tobias; Herbert, J Taylor; Shapiro, Nathan I; Schauer, Steven G; Long, Brit J; Imhoff, Brant; Wang, Li; Rhoads, Jillian P; Womack, Kelsey N; Janz, David R; Self, Wesley H; Rice, Todd W; Ginde, Adit A; Casey, Jonathan D; Semler, Matthew W
The New England journal of medicine, 08/2023, Letnik: 389, Številka: 5Journal Article
Whether video laryngoscopy as compared with direct laryngoscopy increases the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt among critically ill adults is uncertain. In a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 17 emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs), we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation to the video-laryngoscope group or the direct-laryngoscope group. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications during intubation; severe complications were defined as severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, new or increased vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, or death. The trial was stopped for efficacy at the time of the single preplanned interim analysis. Among 1417 patients who were included in the final analysis (91.5% of whom underwent intubation that was performed by an emergency medicine resident or a critical care fellow), successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 600 of the 705 patients (85.1%) in the video-laryngoscope group and in 504 of the 712 patients (70.8%) in the direct-laryngoscope group (absolute risk difference, 14.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval CI, 9.9 to 18.7; P<0.001). A total of 151 patients (21.4%) in the video-laryngoscope group and 149 patients (20.9%) in the direct-laryngoscope group had a severe complication during intubation (absolute risk difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 4.9). Safety outcomes, including esophageal intubation, injury to the teeth, and aspiration, were similar in the two groups. Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in an emergency department or ICU, the use of a video laryngoscope resulted in a higher incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt than the use of a direct laryngoscope. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense; DEVICE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239195.).
Avtor
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.