NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Radical Prostatectomy, Exte...
    Kishan, Amar U; Cook, Ryan R; Ciezki, Jay P; Ross, Ashley E; Pomerantz, Mark M; Nguyen, Paul L; Shaikh, Talha; Tran, Phuoc T; Sandler, Kiri A; Stock, Richard G; Merrick, Gregory S; Demanes, D Jeffrey; Spratt, Daniel E; Abu-Isa, Eyad I; Wedde, Trude B; Lilleby, Wolfgang; Krauss, Daniel J; Shaw, Grace K; Alam, Ridwan; Reddy, Chandana A; Stephenson, Andrew J; Klein, Eric A; Song, Daniel Y; Tosoian, Jeffrey J; Hegde, John V; Yoo, Sun Mi; Fiano, Ryan; D'Amico, Anthony V; Nickols, Nicholas G; Aronson, William J; Sadeghi, Ahmad; Greco, Stephen; Deville, Curtiland; McNutt, Todd; DeWeese, Theodore L; Reiter, Robert E; Said, Johnathan W; Steinberg, Michael L; Horwitz, Eric M; Kupelian, Patrick A; King, Christopher R

    JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 03/2018, Letnik: 319, Številka: 9
    Journal Article

    The optimal treatment for Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer is unknown. To compare clinical outcomes of patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer after definitive treatment. Retrospective cohort study in 12 tertiary centers (11 in the United States, 1 in Norway), with 1809 patients treated between 2000 and 2013. Radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy, or EBRT plus brachytherapy boost (EBRT+BT) with androgen deprivation therapy. The primary outcome was prostate cancer-specific mortality; distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival were secondary outcomes. Of 1809 men, 639 underwent RP, 734 EBRT, and 436 EBRT+BT. Median ages were 61, 67.7, and 67.5 years; median follow-up was 4.2, 5.1, and 6.3 years, respectively. By 10 years, 91 RP, 186 EBRT, and 90 EBRT+BT patients had died. Adjusted 5-year prostate cancer-specific mortality rates were RP, 12% (95% CI, 8%-17%); EBRT, 13% (95% CI, 8%-19%); and EBRT+BT, 3% (95% CI, 1%-5%). EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower prostate cancer-specific mortality than either RP or EBRT (cause-specific HRs of 0.38 95% CI, 0.21-0.68 and 0.41 95% CI, 0.24-0.71). Adjusted 5-year incidence rates of distant metastasis were RP, 24% (95% CI, 19%-30%); EBRT, 24% (95% CI, 20%-28%); and EBRT+BT, 8% (95% CI, 5%-11%). EBRT+BT was associated with a significantly lower rate of distant metastasis (propensity-score-adjusted cause-specific HRs of 0.27 95% CI, 0.17-0.43 for RP and 0.30 95% CI, 0.19-0.47 for EBRT). Adjusted 7.5-year all-cause mortality rates were RP, 17% (95% CI, 11%-23%); EBRT, 18% (95% CI, 14%-24%); and EBRT+BT, 10% (95% CI, 7%-13%). Within the first 7.5 years of follow-up, EBRT+BT was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (cause-specific HRs of 0.66 95% CI, 0.46-0.96 for RP and 0.61 95% CI, 0.45-0.84 for EBRT). After the first 7.5 years, the corresponding HRs were 1.16 (95% CI, 0.70-1.92) and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.57-1.32). No significant differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality, distant metastasis, or all-cause mortality (≤7.5 and >7.5 years) were found between men treated with EBRT or RP (cause-specific HRs of 0.92 95% CI, 0.67-1.26, 0.90 95% CI, 0.70-1.14, 1.07 95% CI, 0.80-1.44, and 1.34 95% CI, 0.85-2.11). Among patients with Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer, treatment with EBRT+BT with androgen deprivation therapy was associated with significantly better prostate cancer-specific mortality and longer time to distant metastasis compared with EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy or with RP.