NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Evolution in the management...
    Wilkinson, Eric P.; Hoa, Michael; Slattery III, William H.; Fayad, Jose N.; Friedman, Rick A.; Schwartz, Marc S.; Brackmann, Derald E.

    The Laryngoscope, October 2011, Letnik: 121, Številka: 10
    Journal Article

    Objective: To design a treatment algorithm based on experience with facial nerve schwannomas (FNS) over a 30‐year period. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Method: Seventy‐nine patients with facial nerve schwannomas seen from 1979 through 2009 at a tertiary referral private otologic practice were categorized by treatment modality. Interventions included surgical resection with grafting, bony decompression, observation, or stereotactic radiation. Outcome measures included House‐Brackmann facial nerve grade before and after intervention as well as change in facial nerve grade, tumor size, involved segments of nerve, time to intervention. Results: Thirty‐seven patients (46.8%) ultimately underwent surgical excision with grafting or primary anastomosis, 21 (26.6%) underwent bony decompression alone, 15 (19.0%) were managed with observation only, and 6 (7.6%) had stereotactic radiation. Through 1995, 85% of cases had surgical resection and none had observation only. Of the 52 patients seen after 1995, 27% had surgical resection and grafting, 33% had bony decompression, 29% were managed with observation alone, and 11% had radiotherapy. Facial nerve grade was maintained or improved over the follow‐up period (mean time = 3.9 years) in 78.9% of the decompression group and 100% of the observation and radiation groups compared to 54.8% of the resection group (P ≤ .012). Conclusions: Surgical resection and grafting, once widely accepted and practiced, has in many cases given way to observation, bony decompression, or stereotactic radiation. A wide armamentarium of options is available to the neurotologist treating facial nerve schwannomas with the ability to preserve facial function for a longer period of time.