E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Elafandi, Haytham; Khalifa, Mohamed Adel; Elguindy, Ahmed S.
International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, November 2020, 2020-Nov, 2020-11-00, 20201101, Letnik: 138Journal Article
assessment of two techniques for electrode insertion during cochlear implantation which are the round window and the traditional cochleostomy insertions, the comparison utilized cochlear implantation outcomes. a prospective cohort study. children (n = 200) between 2 and 8 years old who had bilateral severe to profound SNHL and received a unilateral cochlear implant, 100 children had a round window insertion and were labeled the RW group while the other 100 children had a cochleostomy insertion and were labeled the C group which was taken as a control group. all the participants in this study were followed up and tested twice for their cochlear implant outcomes, the first time when the duration of using their implants was no less than 24 months and no more than 30 months. The second time between 31 and 36 months post implantation. For speech perception; The Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant test (CNC) and The Bamford-Kowal-Bench sentence lists (BKB). For language acquisition; The Preschool Language Scale-fourth edition (PLS-4) and The Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth edition (PPVT-4) had been utilized. For speech production; the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP). for speech perception: The mean CNC scores for the RW group and the C group between 24 and 30 months post-implantation and at 31–36 months post-implantation were better for the round window group. Also, the mean BKB scores for the RW group were higher than the C group between 24 and 30 months post-implantation (p < 0.0013) and at 31–36 months post-implantation (p < 0.0011). for language acquisition; the PLS-4 mean scores for the RW group and the C group between 24 and 30 months post-implantation and at 31–36 months post-implantation were better for the round window group (p < 0.001). The PPVT-4 mean scores for the RW group were also higher than the C group at both durations. for speech production; The mean word intelligibility scores of the DEAP for the RW group were better at 24 to 30 and 31–36 months post-implantation. Round window insertion is associated with superior cochlear implantation outcomes regarding speech perception, language acquisition and speech production rather than the standard cochleostomy insertion.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.