NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Deficits in Advance Care Pl...
    Patel, Arpan Arun; Ryan, Gery W; Tisnado, Diana; Chuang, Emmeline; Walling, Anne M; Saab, Sammy; Khemichian, Saro; Sundaram, Vinay; Brook, Robert H; Wenger, Neil S

    JAMA internal medicine, 05/2021, Letnik: 181, Številka: 5
    Journal Article

    The burden of end-of-life care for patients with cirrhosis is increasing in the US, and most of these patients, many of whom are not candidates for liver transplant, die in institutions receiving aggressive care. Advance care planning (ACP) has been associated with improved end-of-life outcomes for patients with other chronic illnesses, but it has not been well-characterized in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. To describe the experience of ACP in patients with decompensated cirrhosis at liver transplant centers. For this multicenter qualitative study, face-to-face semistructured interviews were conducted between July 1, 2017, and May 30, 2018, with clinicians and patients with decompensated cirrhosis at 3 high-volume transplant centers in California. Patient participants were adults and had a diagnosis of cirrhosis, at least 1 portal hypertension-related complication, and current or previous Model for End-Stage Liver Disease with sodium score of 15 or higher. Clinician participants were health care professionals who provided care during the illness trajectory. Experiences with ACP reported by patients and clinicians. Participants were asked about the context, behaviors, thoughts, and decisions concerning elements of ACP, such as prognosis, health care preferences, values and goals, surrogate decision-making, and documentation. The study included 42 patients (mean SD age, 58.2 11.2 years; 28 men 67%) and 46 clinicians (13 hepatologists 28%, 11 transplant coordinators 24%, 9 hepatobiliary surgeons 20%, 6 social workers 13%, 5 hepatology nurse practitioners 11%, and 2 critical care physicians 4%). Five themes that represent the experiences of ACP were identified: (1) most patient consideration of values, goals, and preferences occurred outside outpatient visits; (2) optimistic attitudes from transplant teams hindered the discussions about dying; (3) clinicians primarily discussed death as a strategy for encouraging behavioral change; (4) transplant teams avoided discussing nonaggressive treatment options with patients; and (5) surrogate decision makers were unprepared for end-of-life decision-making. This study found that, despite a guarded prognosis, patients with decompensated cirrhosis had inadequate ACP throughout the trajectory of illness until the end of life. This finding may explain excessively aggressive life-sustaining treatment that patients receive at the end of life.