NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Phase III trial of bortezom...
    Mai, E K; Bertsch, U; Dürig, J; Kunz, C; Haenel, M; Blau, I W; Munder, M; Jauch, A; Schurich, B; Hielscher, T; Merz, M; Huegle-Doerr, B; Seckinger, A; Hose, D; Hillengass, J; Raab, M S; Neben, K; Lindemann, H-W; Zeis, M; Gerecke, C; Schmidt-Wolf, I G H; Weisel, K; Scheid, C; Salwender, H; Goldschmidt, H

    Leukemia, 08/2015, Letnik: 29, Številka: 8
    Journal Article

    We aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone (VCD) compared to bortezomib/doxorubicin/dexamethasone (PAd) induction therapy with respect to very good partial response rates or better (⩾VGPR) in 504 newly diagnosed, transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients. VCD was found to be non-inferior to PAd with respect to ⩾VGPR rates (37.0 versus 34.3%, P=0.001). The rates of progressive disease (PD) were 0.4% (VCD) versus 4.8% (PAd; P=0.003). In the PAd arm, 11 of 12 patients with PD had either renal impairment (creatinine ⩾2 mg/dl) at diagnosis or the cytogenetic abnormality gain 1q21, whereas no PD was observed in these subgroups in the VCD arm. Leukocytopenia/neutropenia (⩾3°) occurred more frequently in the VCD arm (35.2% versus 11.3%, P<0.001). Neuropathy rates (⩾2°) were higher in the PAd group (14.9 versus 8.4%, P=0.03). Serious adverse events, both overall and those related to thromboembolic events, were higher in the PAd group (32.7 versus 24.0%, P=0.04 and 2.8 versus 0.4%, P=0.04). Stem cell collection was not impeded by VCD. VCD is as effective as PAd in terms of achieving ⩾VGPR rates with fewer PD and has a favorable toxicity profile. Therefore, VCD is preferable to PAd as induction therapy.