NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Odprti dostop
  • Adachi, I; Aihara, H; Arinstein, K; Asner, D M; Aulchenko, V; Aziz, T; Bahinipati, S; Ban, Y; Bay, A; Behera, P; Belous, K; Bhardwaj, V; Chao, Y; Chekelian, V; Chilikin, K; Dalseno, J; Dingfelder, J; Doležal, Z; Drutskoy, A; Dutta, D; Frey, A; Ganguly, S; Goh, Y M; M Grosse Perdekamp; Grzymkowska, O; Haba, J; He, X H; Heffernan, D; Heller, A; Horii, Y; Iwabuchi, M; Iwasaki, Y; Jones, M; Kakuno, H; Kapusta, P; Katayama, N; Kato, E; Kato, Y; Kawai, H; Kawasaki, T; Kichimi, H; Kim, B H; Kim, D Y; Kim, J H; Kim, M J; Ko, B R; Koga, Y; Kvasnička, P; Y -J Kwon; Leitner, R; Y Li; L Li Gioi; Libby, J; Lukin, P; Matvienko, D; Mohapatra, D; Mori, T; Nakahama, Y; Nakano, T; Nakazawa, H; Nedelkovska, E; C Ng; Nishida, S; Olsen, S L; Onuki, Y; Ostrowicz, W; Oswald, C; Pakhlova, G; Peters, M; Petrič, M; Poluektov, A; Rostomyan, A; Rozanska, M; Saito, T; Santelj, L; Sasao, N; Savinov, V; Schnell, G; Schwartz, A J; Seidl, R; Semmler, D; Senyo, K; Seon, O; Smerkol, P; Suzuki, S Y; Tamponi, U; Uchida, M; Uno, S; Wang, J; M -Z Wang; Wedd, R; Wehle, S; White, E; Yabsley, B D; Yamamoto, H; Yamauchi, M; Yuan, C Z; Zhang, C C; Zhilich, V; Zupanc, A

    arXiv.org, 03/2015
    Paper

    We report a measurement of the amplitude ratio \(r_S\) of \(B^0 \to D^0K^{*0}\) and \(B^0 \to \bar{D^0}K^{*0}\) decays with a model-independent Dalitz plot analysis using \(D\to K_S^0\pi^+\pi^-\) decays. Using the full data sample of \(772\times10^6\) \(B\bar{B}\) pairs collected at the \(\Upsilon(4S)\) resonance with the Belle detector at KEKB accelerator the upper limit is \(r_S < 0.87\) at the 68 % confidence level. This result is the first measurement of \(r_S\) with a model-independent Dalitz analysis, and is consistent with results from other analyses. The value of \(r_S\) indicates the sensitivity of the decay to \(\phi_3\) because the statistical uncertainty is proportional to \(1/r_S\). The \(r_S\) result is obtained from observables (\(x_\pm\), \(y_\pm\)) \begin{eqnarray} x_- &=& +0.4 ^{+1.0 +0.0}_{-0.6 -0.1} \pm0.0 \\ y_- &=& -0.6 ^{+0.8 +0.1}_{-1.0 -0.0} \pm0.1 \\ x_+ &=& +0.1 ^{+0.7 +0.0}_{-0.4 -0.1} \pm0.1 \\ y_+ &=& +0.3 ^{+0.5 +0.0}_{-0.8 -0.1} \pm0.1 \\ , \end{eqnarray} where \(x_\pm = r_S \cos(\delta_S \pm \phi_3)\), \(y_\pm = r_S \sin(\delta_S \pm \phi_3)\) and \(\phi_3 (\delta_S)\) are the weak (strong) phase difference between \(B^0 \to D^0K^{*0}\) and \(B^0 \to \bar{D^0}K^{*0}\). The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the experimental systematic and the third is the systematic due to the uncertainties on \(c_i\) and \(s_i\) parameters measured by CLEO.