NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Grazing management for soil...
    McDonald, Sarah E.; Badgery, Warwick; Clarendon, Simon; Orgill, Susan; Sinclair, Katrina; Meyer, Rachelle; Butchart, Dominique Bowen; Eckard, Richard; Rowlings, David; Grace, Peter; Doran-Browne, Natalie; Harden, Steven; Macdonald, Ainslie; Wellington, Michael; Pachas, Anibal Nahuel Alejandro; Eisner, Rowan; Amidy, Martin; Harrison, Matthew Tom

    Journal of environmental management, 12/2023, Letnik: 347
    Journal Article

    The livestock industry accounts for a considerable proportion of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and in response, the Australian red meat industry has committed to an aspirational target of net-zero emissions by 2030. Increasing soil carbon storage in grazing lands has been identified as one method to help achieve this, while also potentially improving production and provision of other ecosystem services. This review examined the effects of grazing management on soil carbon and factors that drive soil carbon sequestration in Australia. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis was used to compare effects of stocking intensity (stocking rate or utilisation) and stocking method (i.e, continuous, rotational or seasonal grazing systems) on soil organic carbon, pasture herbage mass, plant growth and ground cover. Impacts on below ground biomass, soil nitrogen and soil structure are also discussed. Overall, no significant impact of stocking intensity or method on soil carbon sequestration in Australia was found, although lower stocking intensity and incorporating periods of rest into grazing systems (rotational grazing) had positive effects on herbage mass and ground cover compared with higher stocking intensity or continuous grazing. Minimal impact of grazing management on pasture growth rate and below-ground biomass has been reported in Australia. However, these factors improved with grazing intensity or rotational grazing in some circumstances. While there is a lack of evidence in Australia that grazing management directly increases soil carbon, this meta-analysis indicated that grazing management practices have potential to benefit the drivers of soil carbon sequestration by increasing above and below-ground plant production, maintaining a higher residual biomass, and promoting productive perennial pasture species. Specific recommendations for future research and management are provided in the paper. •Overall, no significant impact of grazing management on soil carbon in Australia.•Grazing intensity and method affects SOC drivers, including biomass and ground cover.•Limited research on impact of grazing on above and below ground plant growth in Australia.•Management to promote plant growth, perennials & legumes, cover and soil health can increase SOC.•Further research on grazing management for SOC sequestration in Australia is required.