NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Review article: the impact ...
    Ardila‐Hani, A.; Soffer, E. E.

    Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, October 2011, Letnik: 34, Številka: 8
    Journal Article

    Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 825–831 Summary Background  Obesity is a major medical problem worldwide. Different treatment modalities have emerged to treat obese patients, but the best long‐term results are achieved with bariatric surgery. Currently, the interventions most commonly performed are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux‐en‐Y‐ gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy. Aim  To review the gastrointestinal motor complications associated with each of these types of bariatric interventions and the clinical implications of such complications. Methods  Search of medical database (PubMed) on English‐language articles from January 1996 to March 2011. The search terms used were laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), roux‐en‐Y‐gastric bypass (RYGB), using the AND operator with the terms: complications, motility, GERD, reflux, gastric emptying, esophagitis, dysphagia. Results  Of the three bariatric interventions reviewed, LAGB was the most studied. Most studies reported short follow‐up, of ≤1 year. Oesophageal motor dysfunction is the most common motility complication following the bariatric interventions that were reviewed and is mainly observed after LAGB. Some data suggest that oesophageal motor function testing predicts development of post‐operative symptoms and oesophageal dilation. RYGB offers protection from gastro‐oesophageal reflux. Sleeve gastrectomy was the least studied and was associated with an acceleration of gastric emptying. Conclusions  The effects of these interventions on GI motility should be considered when selecting patients for bariatric surgery. There is scant information regarding the overall effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastro‐oesophageal reflux patterns and oesophageal motility.