NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Testing hadronic interactio...
    Repond, J.; Schlereth, J.; Xia, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yue, Q.; Yang, Z.; Eigen, G.; Price, T.; Ward, D.R.; Benchekroun, D.; Hoummada, A.; Cârloganu, C.; Khan, A.; Kong, D.J.; Oh, Y.D.; Francis, K.; Lima, J.G.R.; Salcido, P.; Zutshi, V.; Boisvert, V.; Green, B.; Misiejuk, A.; Miyazaki, Y.; Sudo, Y.; Suehara, T.; Folger, G.; Ivantchenko, V.; Ribon, A.; Uzhinskiy, V.; Cauwenbergh, S.; Zaganidis, N.; Gadow, K.; Göttlicher, P.; Krüger, K.; Reinecke, M.; Sefkow, F.; Feege, N.; Laurien, S.; Lu, S.; Marchesini, I.; Ramilli, M.; Kaplan, A.; Onel, Y.; Kim, E.J.; van Doren, B.; Wilson, G.W.; Wing, M.; Chadeeva, M.; Danilov, M.; Drutskoy, A.; Markin, O.; Rusinov, V.; Tarkovsky, E.; Besson, D.; Simon, F.; Soldner, C.; Szalay, M.; Callier, S.; Conforti di Lorenzo, S.; Doublet, Ph; Fleury, J.; Frisson, T.; Kégl, B.; Li, H.; Richard, F.; de la Taille, Ch; Pöschl, R.; Raux, L.; Rouëné, J.; Seguin-Moreau, N.; Anduze, M.; Balagura, V.; Becheva, E.; Boudry, V.; Brient, J-C.; Cornat, R.; Frotin, M.; Gastaldi, F.; Magniette, F.; Mora de Freitas, P.; Videau, H.; Augustin, J-E.; David, J.; Ghislain, P.; Lacour, D.; Lavergne, L.; Zacek, J.; Cvach, J.; Janata, M.; Kvasnicka, J.; Lednicky, D.; Polak, I.; Popule, J.; Ruzicka, P.; Sicho, P.; Vrba, V.; Zalesak, J.; Jeans, D.; Götze, M.

    Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 09/2015, Letnik: 794, Številka: C
    Journal Article

    A detailed study of hadronic interactions is presented using data recorded with the highly granular CALICE silicon–tungsten electromagnetic calorimeter. Approximately 350,000 selected π− events at energies between 2 and 10GeV have been studied. The predictions of several physics models available within the GEANT4 simulation tool kit are compared to this data. A reasonable overall description of the data is observed; the Monte Carlo predictions are within 20% of the data, and for many observables much closer. The largest quantitative discrepancies are found in the longitudinal and transverse distributions of reconstructed energy.