NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Topical lignocaine anaesthe...
    Kanodia, Anupam; Srigyan, Deepankar; Sikka, Kapil; Choudhary, Aashish; Choudekar, Avinash; Mittal, Saurabh; Bhopale, Shweta Arun; Dar, Lalit; Thakar, Alok

    European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 05/2021, Letnik: 278, Številka: 5
    Journal Article

    Objectives To ascertain if topical lignocaine application in oropharynx prior to swab sampling to test for COVID-19 improves a patient’s comfort and to assess its effect on the swab sample taken to conduct the RT-PCR. Methods Adult patients testing positive on the RT-PCR COVID-19 test were sampled again within 48 h after administering topical oropharyngeal anaesthesia. Patients were asked to rate their discomfort on a visual analog scale (VAS) for both sample A and B. A qualitative real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, was performed, and the cycle threshold value (Ct), used as a surrogate marker for the viral load, was measured for the sample taken without lignocaine (sample A) and the sample taken post-lignocaine application (sample B). The difference in Ct values of both the groups was checked for any statistical significance using paired t-test. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used on VAS scores to determine any significant decrease in discomfort. Results Forty patients were included in the study. Twenty-nine patients (72.5%) reported the procedure to be more comfortable post-lignocaine application. Median (IQR) discomfort on VAS decreased from 7 (1) to 5 (2) after lignocaine use, which was statistically significant ( p  < 0.05). Mean Ct value for sample A was 17.21 ± 5.25 and for sample B was 18.44 ± 4.8 ( p  > 0.05), indicating a non-significant effect of lignocaine on SARS-CoV-2 concentration in the sample. Conclusion Topical lignocaine, while improving the comfort of the procedure of oropharyngeal sampling for patient did not alter the SARS-CoV-2 viral load that was detected in nasal and oropharyngeal samples taken together.