NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Circulating tumor DNA in ne...
    Magbanua, M.J.M.; Swigart, L.B.; Wu, H.-T.; Hirst, G.L.; Yau, C.; Wolf, D.M.; Tin, A.; Salari, R.; Shchegrova, S.; Pawar, H.; Delson, A.L.; DeMichele, A.; Liu, M.C.; Chien, A.J.; Tripathy, D.; Asare, S.; Lin, C.-H.J.; Billings, P.; Aleshin, A.; Sethi, H.; Louie, M.; Zimmermann, B.; Esserman, L.J.; van ‘t Veer, L.J.

    Annals of oncology, 02/2021, Letnik: 32, Številka: 2
    Journal Article

    Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is strongly associated with favorable outcome. We examined the utility of serial circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing for predicting pCR and risk of metastatic recurrence. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was isolated from 291 plasma samples of 84 high-risk early breast cancer patients treated in the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 TRIAL with standard NAC alone or combined with MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor) treatment. Blood was collected at pretreatment (T0), 3 weeks after initiation of paclitaxel (T1), between paclitaxel and anthracycline regimens (T2), or prior to surgery (T3). A personalized ctDNA test was designed to detect up to 16 patient-specific mutations (from whole-exome sequencing of pretreatment tumor) in cfDNA by ultra-deep sequencing. The median follow-up time for survival analysis was 4.8 years. At T0, 61 of 84 (73%) patients were ctDNA positive, which decreased over time (T1: 35%; T2: 14%; and T3: 9%). Patients who remained ctDNA positive at T1 were significantly more likely to have residual disease after NAC (83% non-pCR) compared with those who cleared ctDNA (52% non-pCR; odds ratio 4.33, P = 0.012). After NAC, all patients who achieved pCR were ctDNA negative (n = 17, 100%). For those who did not achieve pCR (n = 43), ctDNA-positive patients (14%) had a significantly increased risk of metastatic recurrence hazard ratio (HR) 10.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-46.6; interestingly, patients who did not achieve pCR but were ctDNA negative (86%) had excellent outcome, similar to those who achieved pCR (HR 1.4; 95% CI 0.15-13.5). Lack of ctDNA clearance was a significant predictor of poor response and metastatic recurrence, while clearance was associated with improved survival even in patients who did not achieve pCR. Personalized monitoring of ctDNA during NAC of high-risk early breast cancer may aid in real-time assessment of treatment response and help fine-tune pCR as a surrogate endpoint of survival. •Lack of ctDNA clearance early during NAC portends poor response.•Detectable ctDNA during NAC is associated with poor outcomes.•Failure to clear ctDNA after NAC is associated with inferior distant disease-free recurrence survival.•Clearance of ctDNA is associated with improved survival even in patients who did not achieve pCR.