NUK - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Prognostic value of tumor–s...
    Vangangelt, K. M. H.; van Pelt, G. W.; Engels, C. C.; Putter, H.; Liefers, G. J.; Smit, V. T. H. B. M.; Tollenaar, R. A. E. M.; Kuppen, P. J. K.; Mesker, W. E.

    Breast cancer research and treatment, 04/2018, Letnik: 168, Številka: 3
    Journal Article

    Purpose Complex interactions occur between cancer cells and cells in the tumor microenvironment. In this study, the prognostic value of the interplay between tumor–stroma ratio (TSR) and the immune status of tumors in breast cancer patients was evaluated. Methods A cohort of 574 breast cancer patients was analyzed. The percentage of tumor stroma was visually estimated on Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histological tumor tissue sections. Immunohistochemical staining was performed for classical human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I, HLA-E, HLA-G, markers for regulatory T (Treg) cells, natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTLs). Results TSR ( P  < .001) and immune status of tumors ( P  < .001) were both statistically significant for recurrence free period (RFP) and both independent prognosticators ( P  < .001) in which tumors with a high stromal content behave more aggressively as well as tumors with a low immune status. Ten years RFP for patients with a stroma-low tumor and high immune status profile was 87% compared to 17% of patients with a stroma-high tumor combined with low immune status profile ( P  < .001). Classical HLA class I is the most prominent immune marker in the immune status profiles. Conclusions Determination of TSR is a simple, fast and cheap method. The effect on RFP of TSR when combined with immune status of tumors or expression of classical HLA class I is even stronger. Both are promising for further prediction and achievement of tailored treatment for breast cancer patients.