NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Instantaneous effects of pr...
    Xia, Adam W.L.; Jin, Minxia; Qin, Penny P.I.; Kan, Rebecca L.D.; Zhang, Bella B.B.; Giron, Cristian G.; Lin, Tim T.Z.; Li, Ami S.M.; Kranz, Georg S.

    NeuroImage, June 2024, 2024-Jun, 2024-06-00, 20240601, 2024-06-01, Letnik: 293
    Journal Article

    •Provides a thorough understanding of brain activation during/immediately after prefrontal TMS.•The prefrontal cortex, insula, striatum, anterior cingulate and thalamus are engaged.•The target engagement (local and remote regions) is inconsistent among studies. This systematic review investigates how prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) immediately influences neuronal excitability based on oxygenation changes measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). A thorough understanding of TMS-induced excitability changes may enable clinicians to adjust TMS parameters and optimize treatment plans proactively. Five databases were searched for human studies evaluating brain excitability using concurrent TMS/fMRI or TMS/fNIRS. Thirty-seven studies (13 concurrent TMS/fNIRS studies, 24 concurrent TMS/fMRI studies) were included in a qualitative synthesis. Despite methodological inconsistencies, a distinct pattern of activated nodes in the frontoparietal central executive network, the cingulo-opercular salience network, and the default-mode network emerged. The activated nodes included the prefrontal cortex (particularly dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), insula cortex, striatal regions (especially caudate, putamen), anterior cingulate cortex, and thalamus. High-frequency repetitive TMS most consistently induced expected facilitatory effects in these brain regions. However, varied stimulation parameters (e.g., intensity, coil orientation, target sites) and the inter- and intra-individual variability of brain state contribute to the observed heterogeneity of target excitability and co-activated regions. Given the considerable methodological and individual variability across the limited evidence, conclusions should be drawn with caution.