This study was undertaken in order to elucidate the differences between various planes of measurement and Doppler techniques (pulsed‐ vs. continuous‐wave Doppler) across the aortic valve to estimate cardiac output. In 45 coronary artery bypass patients, cardiac output was measured each time using four different Doppler techniques (transverse and longitudinal plane, pulsed‐ and continuous‐wave Doppler) and compared with the thermodilution technique. Measurements were performed after induction of anaesthesia and shortly after arrival in the intensive care unit. Optimal imaging was obtained in 91% of the patients, in whom a total of 82 measurements of cardiac output were performed. The respective mean (SD) areas of the aortic valve were 3.77 (0.71) cm2 in the transverse plane and 3.86 (0.89) cm2 in the longitudinal plane. A correlation of 0.87 was found between pulsed‐wave Doppler cardiac output and the thermodilution technique in either transverse or longitudinal plane. Correlation coefficients of 0.82 and 0.84 were found between thermodilution cardiac output and transverse and longitudinal continuous‐wave Doppler cardiac output, respectively. Although thermodilution cardiac output is a widely accepted clinical standard, transoesophageal Doppler echocardiography across the aortic valve offers adequate estimations of cardiac output. In particular, pulsed‐wave Doppler cardiac output in both the transverse and longitudinal plane provides useful data.