NUK - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Manuel Spitschan; Laura Kervezee; Renske Lok; Elise McGlashan; Raymond P. Najjar; Annette E. Allen; Marilyne Andersen; Salvador Bará; Peter Blattner; Christine Blume; Diane B. Boivin; María-Ángeles Bonmatí-Carrión; Kai Broszio; Timothy M. Brown; Sarah Laxhmi Chellappa; Jeanne F. Duffy; Taisuke Eto; Erin Flynn-Evans; Steve Fotios; Virginie Gabel; Corrado Garbazza; Gena Glickman; Marijke C. Gordijn; John P. Hanifin; Lauren Hartstein; Michael Herf; Shigekazu Higuchi; Cassie J. Hilditch; Kevin W. Houser; Anya Hurlbert; Monique K. LeBourgeois; Steven Lockley; Robert Lucas; Claudia R.C. Moreno; Mirjam Münch; Ludovic S. Mure; Stuart Peirson; Shadab Rahman; Victoria L. Revell; Roberto G. Rodriguez; Kathryn Roecklein; A.V. Rukmini; John Sammarco; Nayantara Santhi; Luc J.M. Schlangen; Isabel Schöllhorn; Katherine M. Sharkey; Debra J. Skene; Tracey L. Sletten; Karin C.H.J. Smolders; Oliver Stefani; Julia E. Stone; Petteri Teikari; Michael Terman; Khanh Tran Quoc; Kazuo Tsubota; Ljiljana Udovicic; Gilles Vandewalle; Jennifer A. Veitch; CélineVetter; Lisa M. Wu; Johannes Zauner; Jamie Zeitzer

    EBioMedicine, 12/2023, Letnik: 98
    Journal Article

    Background: There is no consensus on reporting light characteristics in studies investigating non-visual responses to light. This project aimed to develop a reporting checklist for laboratory-based investigations on the impact of light on non-visual physiology. Methods: A four-step modified Delphi process (three questionnaire-based feedback rounds and one face-to-face group discussion) involving international experts was conducted to reach consensus on the items to be included in the checklist. Following the consensus process, the resulting checklist was tested in a pilot phase with independent experts. Findings: An initial list of 61 items related to reporting light-based interventions was condensed to a final checklist containing 25 items, based upon consensus among experts (final n = 60). Nine items were deemed necessary to report regardless of research question or context. A description of each item is provided in the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document. The independent pilot testing phase led to minor textual clarifications in the checklist and E&E document. Interpretation: The ENLIGHT Checklist is the first consensus-based checklist for documenting and reporting ocular light-based interventions for human studies. The implementation of the checklist will enhance the impact of light-based research by ensuring comprehensive documentation, enhancing reproducibility, and enabling data aggregation across studies. Funding: Network of European Institutes for Advanced Study (NETIAS) Constructive Advanced Thinking (CAT) programme; Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship (Wellcome Trust, 204686/Z/16/Z); Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development VENI fellowship (2020–09150161910128); U.S. Department of Defense Grant (W81XWH-16-1-0223); National University of Singapore (NUHSRO/2022/038/Startup/08); and National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF2022-THE004-0002).